Benxia YU, Bin WANG, Yinghong SHI, Shaohua MI, Yunxia SHI, Hongbo WANG, Fengli LIU, Heng MA, Jian LI

Evaluation of pulmonary vein anatomy using 256-slice computed tomography

Background/aim: This study aimed to evaluate pulmonary vein (PV) anatomy using 256-slice computed tomography (CT), which may be necessary for electrophysiologists to know before radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) therapy. Materials and methods: A total of 102 patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation underwent 256-slice cardiac CT angiography prior to catheter ablation. PV morphology, ostial diameter, ostial orientation, and distance from ostium to first bifurcation were evaluated using three-dimensional volume-rendering and multiplanar-reformatting technology. Results: We found that 72.5% of patients had four conventional PVs. On the right, 22.5% of patients had one accessory PV, 4.9% had 2 accessory PVs, 1% had one common PV, and 1% had one top vein. On the left, 27.5% of patients had one common PV. Additionally, 9.8% of patients had bilateral PV variation. Ostial size was larger for superior PVs than inferior PVs and larger for right PVs than left PVs. PV ostia on the right tended to be more circular. There was a rather wide variation of projective angle and distance from ostium to first bifurcation. Early branching occurred more often in the right inferior PV. Conclusion: 256-Slice CT can depict PV anatomy and afford substantial data, which will help electrophysiologists conduct the RFCA procedure safely and efficiently

PDF

___

1. Pappone C, Rosanio S, Oreto G, Tocchi M, Gugliotta F, Vicedomini G, Salvati A, Dicandia C, Mazzone P, Santinelli V et al. Circumferential radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary vein ostia: a new anatomic approach for curing atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2000; 102: 2619-2628.
2. Oral H, Knight BP, Tada H, Ozaydin M, Chugh A, Hassan S, Scharf C, Lai SW, Greenstein R, Pelosi F Jr et al. Pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2002; 105: 1077-1081.
3. Zheng YF, Yang D, John M, Comaniciu D. Multi-part modeling and segmentation of left atrium in C-arm CT for image-guided ablation of atrial fibrillation. IEEE T Med Imag 2014; 33: 318- 331.
4. Lin WS, Prakash VS, Tai CT, Hsieh MH, Tsai CF, Yu WC, Lin YK, Ding YA, Chang MS, Chen SA. Pulmonary vein morphology in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation initiated by ectopic beats originating from the pulmonary veins: implications for catheter ablation. Circulation 2000; 101: 1274-1281.
5. Kistler PM, Rajappan K, Jahngir M, Earley MJ, Harris S, Abrams D, Gupta D, Liew R, Ellis S, Sporton SC et al. The impact of CT image integration into an electroanatomic mapping system on clinical outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2006; 17: 1093-1101.
6. Hamdan A, Charalampos K, Roettgen R, Wellnhofer E, Gebker R, Paetsch I, Jahnke C, Schnackenburg B, Tang M, Gerds-Li H et al. Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for characterization of pulmonary vein morphology before radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 2009; 104: 1540-1546.
7. Wazni OM, Tsao HM, Chen SA, Chuang HH, Saliba W, Natale A, Klein AL. Cardiovascular imaging in the management of atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 2077-2084.
8. Cronin P, Kelly AM, Desjardins B, Patel S, Gross BH, Kazerooni EA, Morady F, Oral H, Carlos RC. Normative analysis of pulmonary vein drainage patterns on multidetector CT with measurements of pulmonary vein ostial diameter and distance from ostium to first bifurcation. Acad Radiol 2007; 14: 178- 188.
9. Kaseno K, Tada H, Koyama K, Jingu M, Hiramatsu S, Yokokawa M, Goto K, Naito S, Oshima S, Taniguchi K. Prevalence and characterization of pulmonary vein variants in patients with atrial fibrillation determined using 3-dimensional computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2008; 101: 1638-1642.
10. Wang J, Zhang Z, Yu W, Miao C, Yan Z, Zhao Y. A study of images of projective angles of pulmonary veins. Eur J Radiol 2009; 71: 474-479.
11. Thorning C, Hamady M, Liaw JV, Juli C, Lim PB, Dhawan R, Peters NS, Davies DW, Kanagaratnam P, ONeill MD et al. CT evaluation of pulmonary venous anatomy variation in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Clin Imag 2011; 35: 1-9.
12. Manghat NE, Mathias HC, Kakani N, Hamilton MC, MorganHughes G, Roobottom CA. Pulmonary venous evaluation using electrocardiogram-gated 64-detector row cardiac CT. Br J Radiol 2012; 85: 965-971.
13. Hsiao EM, Rybicki FJ, Steigner M. CT Coronary angiography: 256-slice and 320-detector row scanners. Curr Cardiol Rep 2010; 12: 68-75.
14. Yang L, Xu L, Yan Z, Yu W, Fan Z, Lv B, Zhang Z. Low dose 320-row CT for left atrium and pulmonary veins imagingthe feasibility study. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 1549-1554.
15. Lacomis JM, Wigginton W, Fuhrman C, Schwartzman D, Armfield DR, Pealer KM. Multi-detector row CT of the left atrium and pulmonary veins before radio-frequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Radiographics 2003; 23: S35-48.
16. Chu ZG, Gao HL, Yang ZG, Yu JQ, Deng W, Wang QL, Peng LQ, Dong ZH. Pulmonary veins of the patients with atrial fibrillation: dual-source computed tomography evaluation prior to radiofrequency catheter ablation. Int J Cardiol 2011; 148: 245-248.
17. Ghaye B, Szapiro D, Dacher JN, Rodriguez LM, Timmermans C, Devillers D, Dondelinger RF. Percutaneous ablation for atrial fibrillation: the role of cross-sectional imaging. Radiographics 2003; 23: S19-33.
18. Marom EM, Herndon JE, Kim YH, McAdams HP. Variations in pulmonary venous drainage to the left atrium: implications for radiofrequency ablation. Radiology 2004; 230: 824-829.
19. Wannasopha Y, Oilmungmool N, Euathrongchit J. Anatomical variations of pulmonary venous drainage in Thai people: multidetector CT study. Biomed Imag Interv J 2012; 8: e4.
20. Chen J, Yang ZG, Xu HY, Shi K, Long QH, Guo YK. Assessments of pulmonary vein and left atrial anatomical variants in atrial fibrillation patients for catheter ablation with cardiac CT. Eur Radiol 2017; 27: 660-670.
21. Kanaji Y, Miyazaki S, Iwasawa J, Ichihara N, Takagi T, Kuroi A, Nakamura H, Taniguchi H, Hachiya H, Iesaka Y. Preprocedural evaluation of the left atrial anatomy in patients referred for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiol 2016; 67: 115-121.
22. Tsao HM, Wu MH, Yu WC, Tai CT, Lin YK, Haieh MH, Ding YA, Chang MS, Chen SA. Role of right middle pulmonary vein in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2001; 12: 1353-1357.
23. Schwartzman D, Bazaz R, Nosbisch J. Common left pulmonary vein: a consistent source of arrhythmogenic atrial ectopy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2004; 15: 560-566.
24. Van der Voort PH, Van den Bosch H, Post JC, Meijer A. Determination of the spatial orientation and shape of pulmonary vein ostia by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Europace 2006; 8: 1-6.
25. Scharf C, Sneider M, Case I, Chugh A, Lai SW, Pelosi F Jr, Knight BP, Kazerooni E, Morady F, Oral H. Anatomy of the pulmonary veins in patients with atrial fibrillation and effects of segmental ostial ablation analyzed by computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2003; 14: 150-155.
26. Tekbas G, Ekici F, Tekbas E, Gumus H, Onder H, Bilici A, Yavuz C, Hamidi C. Evaluation of pulmonary vein variations in the middle pulmonary lobe with 64-slice multidetector computed tomography. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2011; 15: 1395-1400.
27. Miéville FA, Gudinchet F, Brunelle F, Bochud FO, Verdun FR. Iterative reconstruction methods in two different MDCT scanners: physical metrics and 4-alternative forced-choice detectability experimentsa phantom approach. Phys Med 2013; 29: 99-110.
28. Klass O, Walker M, Siebach A, Stuber T, Feuerlein S, Juchems M, Hoffmann MH. Prospectively gated axial CT coronary angiography: comparison of image quality and effective radiation dose between 64- and 256-slice CT. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 1124-1131.
29. Schroeder S, Achenbach S, Bengel F, Burgstahler C, Cademartiri F, de Feyter P, George R, Kaufmann P, Kopp AF, Knuuti J et al. Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: report of a writing group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 531-556.
30. Lacomis JM, Goitein O, Deible C, Schwartzman D. CT of the pulmonary veins. J Thorac Imag 2007; 22: 63-76.
31. Hou Y, Yue Y, Guo WL, Feng Gq, Yu T, Li GW, Vembar M, Olszewski ME, Guo QY. Prospectively versus retrospectively ECG-gated 256-slice coronary CT angiography: image quality and radiation dose over expanded heart rates. Int J Cardiovasc Imag 2012; 28: 153-162.
32. Menke J, Unterberg-Buchwald C, Staab W. Head-to-head comparison of prospectively triggered vs retrospectively gated coronary computed tomography angiography: meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and radiation dose. Am Heart J 2013; 165: 154-163.
33. Stolzmann P, Leschka S, Scheffel H, Krauss T, Desbiolles L, Plass A, Genoni M, Flohr TG, Wildermuth S, Marincek B et al. Dual-source CT in step-and-shoot mode: noninvasive coronary angiography with low radiation dose. Radiology 2008; 249: 71-80.
34. Kim YH, Marom EM, Herndon JE 2nd, McAdams HP. Pulmonary vein diameter, cross-sectional area, and shape: CT analysis. Radiology 2005; 235: 43-50.