Evaluation of cutaneous anthrax cases during an outbreak in the east region of Turkey

Evaluation of cutaneous anthrax cases during an outbreak in the east region of Turkey

Background/aim: Anthrax is a zoonotic infection caused by Bacillus anthracis. We aimed to retrospectively evaluate cutaneous anthrax cases that occurred during an outbreak in eastern Turkey (Hakkari-Yüksekova), where people mostly earn their living from animal husbandry. Materials and methods: Forty-six cutaneous anthrax patients that were admitted to the hospital during a very short duration of 3 months (June August 2011) were evaluated. Results: Out of 46 patients, 27 (52%) were women and 19 (48%) were men. The mean age was 37 ± 13 years. The distribution of occupations was 1 butcher, 1 cook, 5 farmers, 27 housewives, 11 shepherds, and 1 teacher. Multiple lesions were seen in 7 patients (15%) and the rest of the patients had only 1 lesion. We observed significant clinical differences among the cases and noted which particular symptoms were associated with the various skin lesions. We treated our patients with intramuscular procaine penicillin or oral ciprofloxacin/doxycycline. Conclusion: Anthrax is an important health problem that can cause lethal outbreaks. Therefore, one should think about anthrax when faced with a patient with history of animal contact that has a painless ulcer with edema and/or vesicles, especially in endemic countries like Turkey.

___

  • 1. Turnbull PCB, Kramer JM. Bacillus. In: Balows A, Hausler WJ, Herrmann KL, Isenberg HD, Shadomy HJ, editors. 5th ed. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. Washington, DC, USA: ASM Press; 1991. pp. 296-303.
  • 2. Little SF, Ivins BE. Molecular pathogenesis of Bacillus anthracis infection. Microbes Infect 1999; 1: 131-139.
  • 3. Turnbull P. Anthrax in Humans and Animals. 4th ed. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press; 2008.
  • 4. Doğanay M, Almaç A, Hanağasi R. Primary throat anthrax. A report of six cases. Scand J Infect Dis 1986; 18: 415-419.
  • 5. Thappa DM, Karthikeyan K. Anthrax: an overview within the Indian subcontinent. Int J Dermatol 2001; 40: 216-222.
  • 6. Wenner KA, Kenner JR. Anthrax. Dermatol Clin 2004; 22: 247- 256.
  • 7. Kaya A, Tasyaran MA, Erol S, Ozkurt Z, Ozkan B. Anthrax in adults and children: a review of 132 cases in Turkey. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2002; 21: 258-261.
  • 8. Karahocagil MK, Akdeniz N, Akdeniz H, Calka O, Karsen H, Bilici A, Bilgili SG, Evirgen O. Cutaneous anthrax in eastern Turkey: a review of 85 cases. Clin Exp Dermatol 2008; 33: 406- 411.
  • 9. Doğanay M, Kökkaya A, Hah MN. A review of 35 anthrax cases. Mikrobiyoloji Bülteni 1983; 17: 1-10 (article in Turkish with a summary in English).
  • 10. Oncül O, Ozsoy MF, Gul HC, Koçak N, Cavuslu S, Pahsa A. Cutaneous anthrax in Turkey: a review of 32 cases. Scand J Infect Dis 2002; 34: 413-416.
  • 11. Engin A, Elaldı N, Dökmetaş İ, Bakıcı MZ, Kaya Ş, Bakır M. Cutaneous anthrax in the central Anatolia region of Turkey: a review of 39 adults cases. Türkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2010; 30: 1032-1038.
  • 12. Baykam N, Ergonul O, Ulu A, Eren S, Celikbas A, Eroglu M, Dokuzoguz B. Characteristics of cutaneous anthrax in Turkey. J Infect Dev Ctries 2009; 3: 599-603.
  • 13. Demirdag K, Ozden M, Saral Y, Kalkan A, Kilic SS, Ozdarendeli A. Cutaneous anthrax in adults: a review of 25 cases in the eastern Anatolian region of Turkey. Infection 2003; 31: 327- 330.
  • 14. Metan G, Doğanay M. The antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacillus anthracis isolated from human cases: a review of the Turkish literature. Türkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2009; 29: 229- 235.
  • 15. Doganay M, Metan G, Alp E. A review of cutaneous anthrax and its outcome. J Infect Public Health 2010; 3: 98-105.
  • 16. Bossi P, Tegnell A, Baka A, Van Loock F, Hendriks J, Werner A, Maidhof H, Gouvras G. Bichat guidelines for the clinical management of anthrax and bioterrorism-related anthrax. Euro Surveill 2004; 9: 1-7.
  • 17. Stern EJ, Uhde KB, Shadomy SV, Messonnier N. Conference report on public health and clinical guidelines for anthrax. Emerg Infect Dis 2008; 14: e1.
  • 18. Ray TK, Hutin YJ, Murhekar MV. Cutaneous anthrax, West Bengal, India, 2007. Emerg Infect Dis 2009; 15: 497-499.
  • 19. Woods CW, Ospanov K, Myrzabekov A, Favorov M, Plikaytis B, Ashford DA. Risk factors for human anthrax among contacts of anthrax-infected livestock in Kazakhstan. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2004; 71: 48-52.
  • 20. Turnbull PCB, Böhm R, Cosivi O, Doganay M, Hugh-Jones ME, Joshi DD, Lalitha MK, de Vos V. Guidelines for the Surveillance and Control of Anthrax in Human and Animals. 3rd ed. WHO/EMC/ZDI/98/6.
  • 21. Rao GR, Padmaja J, Lalitha MK, Rao PV, Gopal KV, Kumar HK, Mohanraj P. An outbreak of cutaneous anthrax in a nonendemic district--Visakhapatnam in Andhra Pradesh. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2005; 71: 102-105.
  • 22. Chakraborty A, Khan SU, Hasnat MA, Parveen S, Islam MS, Mikolon A, Chakraborty RK, Ahmed BN, Ara K, Haider N et al. Anthrax outbreaks in Bangladesh, 2009-2010. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2012; 86: 703-710.
  • 23. Reddy R, Parasadini G, Rao P, Uthappa CK, Murhekar MV. Outbreak of cutaneous anthrax in Musalimadugu village, Chittoor district, Andhra Pradesh, India, July-August 2011. J Infect Dev Ctries 2012; 6: 695-699.
  • 24. Rao GRR, Padmaja J, Lalitha MK, Rao PVK, Kumar HK, Gopal KVT, Jaideep M, Mohanraj P. Cutaneous anthrax in a remote tribal area—Araku Valley, Visakhapatnam district, Andhra Pradesh, southern India. Int J Dermatol 2007; 46: 55-58.
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0144
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Raja Ahsan AFTAB, Amer Hayat KHAN, Syed Azhar Syed SULAIMAN, İrfhan ALI, Azmi HASSALI, Fahad SALEEM

Atila EROĞLU, Yener AYDIN, Bayram ALTUNTAŞ, Betül GÜNDOĞDU, Ömer YILMAZ

Zhimeng SHI, Hui QIU, Huangang LIU, Honggang YU

Uğur KOSTAKOĞLU, Sedat SAYLAN, Mevlüt KARATAŞ, Serap İSKENDER, Firdevs AKSOY, Gürdal YILMAZ

Margarita Lubomirova ALEXANDROVA, Maya Penkova DANOVSKA

İrandokht Shenavar MASOOLEH, Asghar HAJIABBASI, Habib ZAYENI, Atefeh GHANBARI, Violet Zaker ESTEGHAMATI, Banafsheh Ghavidel PARSA, Amir HASSANKHANI

Author response to Letter to the editor: Rigorous evaluation of the patterns of nickel sensitization in children with atopic dermatitis is needed

Ayşenur KAYA, Ayşegül AKAN, Can Naci KOCABAŞ, Emin DİBEK MISIRLIOĞLU, Müge TOYRAN, Ersoy CİVELEK, Emine VEZİR, Dilek AZKUR, Mustafa ERKOÇOĞLU

Anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibody in rheumatoid arthritis:a cross-sectional study in Iran

Irandokht SHENAVAR MASOOLEH, Asghar HAJIABBASI, Habib ZAYENI, Atefeh GHANBARI, Violet ZAKER ESTEGHAMATI, Banafsheh GHAVIDEL PARSA, Amir HASSANKHANI

Mustafa Kürşat GÖKCAN, Selçuk MÜLAZİMOĞLU, Emre OCAK, Pinar CAN, Murat ÇALIŞKAN, Ömer BEŞALTI, Serpil Dizbay SAK, Gülşah KAYGUSUZ

The incidence of pressure ulcer in patients on mechanical ventilation andeffects of selected risk factors on pressure ulcer development

Neslihan SARI, Necmiye KILIÇASLAN, Melike KONDAKÇI, Özay AKYOL, Özgül KARAYURT, Nuray AKGÜN, Ümran SARGIN, Hanım EKİNCİ