Effects of Peer and Group Education on Knowledge, Beliefs and Breast Self-Examination Practice among University Students in Turkey

Aims: To determine the effects of peer and group education on knowledge and beliefs about breast cancer and performance of breast self&#8211;examination (BSE). Materials and Methods: The study included a total of 193 female university students, of whom 59 were assigned to peer education and 134 to group education. Data collected at baseline and after six months included sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge of breast cancer and BSE and performance of BSE forms, and Champion´s Health Belief Model Scale. Data were analyzed using the chi-square, McNemar chi-square, independent Student´s t, and paired Student´s t tests. Results: Mean knowledge scores increased from 42.08 ± 13.89 to 65.26 ± 13.08 after peer education (P < 0.001) and from 41.44 ± 12.79 to 63.74 ± 11.74 after group education (P < 0.001). The rate of regular BSE increased from 25.9% to 55.7% six months after peer education (P < 0.001) and from 45.5% to 62.2% after group education (P < 0.001). Perceived benefits and confidence related to BSE increased and perceived barriers decreased significantly after both interventions. Conclusions: Knowledge about breast cancer and BSE practice increased and perceived health beliefs improved equally after both interventions. Depending on the resources available, nurses and other health professionals may choose either peer or group education to increase breast awareness among young women.

Effects of Peer and Group Education on Knowledge, Beliefs and Breast Self-Examination Practice among University Students in Turkey

Aims: To determine the effects of peer and group education on knowledge and beliefs about breast cancer and performance of breast self&#8211;examination (BSE). Materials and Methods: The study included a total of 193 female university students, of whom 59 were assigned to peer education and 134 to group education. Data collected at baseline and after six months included sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge of breast cancer and BSE and performance of BSE forms, and Champion´s Health Belief Model Scale. Data were analyzed using the chi-square, McNemar chi-square, independent Student´s t, and paired Student´s t tests. Results: Mean knowledge scores increased from 42.08 ± 13.89 to 65.26 ± 13.08 after peer education (P < 0.001) and from 41.44 ± 12.79 to 63.74 ± 11.74 after group education (P < 0.001). The rate of regular BSE increased from 25.9% to 55.7% six months after peer education (P < 0.001) and from 45.5% to 62.2% after group education (P < 0.001). Perceived benefits and confidence related to BSE increased and perceived barriers decreased significantly after both interventions. Conclusions: Knowledge about breast cancer and BSE practice increased and perceived health beliefs improved equally after both interventions. Depending on the resources available, nurses and other health professionals may choose either peer or group education to increase breast awareness among young women.

___

  • American Cancer Society, Breast Cancer Facts and Figures 2006. Available from: http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/CAFF 2005BrFacspdf2005.pdf 2. Ministry of Health. The most frequent ten cancers in females in Turkey, 2003. (online breast cancer resources center). Available from: http://212.175.169.156/KSDB/BelgeGoster.aspx?
  • Hakama M, Pukkala E, Kallio M, Godenhjelm K, Svinhufvud U. Effectiveness of screening for breast cancer in women under 50 years at entry: the Kokta Pilot Project in Finland. Int J Cancer 1995; 63: 55-7.
  • Semiglazov VF, Moiseenko VM, Manikhas AG, Protsenko SA, Kharikova RS, Ivanov VG et al. Role of breast self examination in early detection of breast cancer: Russia/WHO prospective randomized trial in St. Petersburg. Cancer Strategy 1999; 1: 145-51.
  • Thomas DB, Gao DL, Ray RM, Wang W, Allison C, Chen F et al. Randomized trial of breast self-examination in Shanghai: final results. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995; 94: 1445–57. 6. Larkin M. Breast self examination does more harm than good says task force. Lancet 2001; 357: 2109-10.
  • Vetto JT. Teaching breast self-examination: a tale of two cities. J Cancer Educ 2006; 21: 115-6.
  • Ministry of Health in Turkey. Control programme of breast cancer: Education on breast self examination. 2006. Available from: http://www.ukdk.org/pdf/kitap/27.pdf
  • Nemcek MA. Factors influencing black women’s breast self
  • examination. Cancer Nurs 1989; 12: 339-43.
  • Rashidi A, Rajarom SS. Middle Eastern Asian Islamic women and breast self- examination. Cancer Nurs 2000; 23: 64-70.
  • Karayurt Ö, Dramalı A. Adaptation of Champion’s Health Belief Model Scale for Turkish women and evaluation of the selected variables associated with breast self-examination. Cancer Nurs 2007; 30: 69-77.
  • Sortet JP, Banks SR. Health belief of rural Appalachian women and the practice of breast self examination. Cancer Nurs 1997; 20: 231-5.
  • Foxal MJ, Barron CR, Houfek J. Ethnic differences in breast self- examination practice and health beliefs. J Adv Nurs 1998; 27: 419-28.
  • Lierman LM, Young HM, Powel-Cope G, Georgiadou F, Benoliel JQ. Effects of education and support on breast self-examination in older women. Nurs Res 1994; 43: 158-63.
  • Tuna-Malak A, Dicle A. Assessing the efficacy of a peer education model in teaching breast self-examination to university students. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2007; 8: 481-4.
  • Seif NY, Aziz MA. Effect of breast self-examination training programme on knowledge, attitude and practice of a group of working women. J Egyptian Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 12: 105–15.
  • Lu ZJ. Effectiveness of breast self-examination nursing interventions for Taiwanese community target groups. J Adv Nurs 2001; 34: 163-70.
  • Özturk M, Engin VS, Kişioglu AN, Yılmazer G. Effects of education on knowledge about and attitude towards breast self examination among 25+ years old women. EJM 2000; 5: 13-17.
  • Aydin I, Gozum S. The effect on teachers' beliefs and behaviours at breast cancer screening of two different educational methods intention of early detection of breast cancer. Eur J Cancer Supplements 2005; 3: 452.
  • Thomas B, Stamler LL, Lafreniere KD, Delahunt TD. Breast health educational interventions: changes in beliefs and practices of working women. AAOHN J 2002; 50: 460-7.
  • Ortega-Altamirano D, Lopez-Carrillo L, Lopez-Cervantes M. Strategies for teaching self-examination of the breast to women in reproductive age. Salud Publica Mex 2000; 42: 17-25.
  • Attia AK, Rahman DAM, Kamel LI. Effect of an educational film on the health belief model and breast self-examination practice. EMHJ 1997; 3: 435-43.
  • Rosentock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH. Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Educ Q 1988; 15: 175-83.
  • Janz NK, Becker MH. The Health Belief Model: a decade later. Health Educ Q 1984; 11: 1-47.
  • Mikhail B. The Health Belief Model: a review and critical evaluation of the model, research and practice. In: Chinn PL, editor. Developing substance mid-range theory in nursing. Advances in Nursing Science Series. Maryland: An Aspen Publication; 1994. pp. 74-92.
  • Poss JE. Developing a new model for cross-cultural research: synthesizing the health belief model and the theory of reasoned action. Adv Nurs Sci 2001; 23: 1-15.
  • Kurt İ. Yetişkin eğitimi (Adult Education). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım Ltd. Şti; 2000. pp. 221-33 (in Turkish).
  • Maurer F. A peer education model for teaching breast self–examination to undergraduate college women. Cancer Nurs 1997; 20: 49-61.
  • Champion VL. Instrument development for health belief model constructs. Adv Nurs Sci 1984; 6: 73-85.
  • Champion VL. Instrument refinement for breast cancer screening behaviors. Nurs Res 1993; 42: 139-43.
  • Champion VL, Menon U. Predicting mammography and breast self-examination in African American women. Cancer Nurs 1997; 20: 315-22.
  • Champion VL. Revised susceptibility, benefits, and barriers scale for mammography screening. Res Nurs Health 1999; 22: 341-8.
  • Ludwick R. Gaczkowski S. Breast self-exams by teenagers. Cancer Nurs 2001; 24: 315–9.
  • Janda M, Stanek C, Newman B, Obermair A, Trimmel M. Impact of videotaped information on frequency and confidence of breast self-examination. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2002; 73: 37-43.
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0144
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Evaluation of Osteoporotic Fractures in a Group of Turkish Women

Mustafa TURAN, Ersin ODABAŞI, Faruk TEKBAŞ, Mustafa KUTLU

Recurrent breast abscess caused by corynebacterium amycolatum: A case report

Sami DOĞAN, İdris ŞAHİN, İsmet ÖZAYDIN, Mustafa YILDIRIM

Seroprevalence of Hepatitis A Infection in the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus

Tijen ÖZACAR, Sadık AKŞİT, Güldane KOTUROĞLU, Zafer KURUGÖL

Comparison of Human Milk, Cow´s Milk and Infant Formulas for Their Antifungal Effects against Environmental Fungi

Emin METE, Ferhat ÇATAL, Cüneyt TAYMAN, Nurdan URAS

Orbital Emphysema due to Nose Blowing

Tunç BÜYÜKYILMAZ, Mustafa SEVER

Examining Antibiotic Use at an Education and Research Hospital in Turkey: Point Prevalence Results

Ali Pekcan DEMİRÖZ, Selcan ARSLAN, Gül Ruhsar YILMAZ, Cemal BULUT

The Clinical and Laboratory Characteristics of Vitamin D Intoxication in Children

Celalettin KOŞAN, Behzat ÖZKAN, Cahit KARAKELLEOĞLU, Hakan DÖNERAY, Asuman ÖZKAN, Zerrin ORBAK

Comparison of clinical and histopathologic findings of pathergy test with disposable/sharp and nondisposable/blunt needles in Behçet’s disease

Ayşe Serap KARADAĞ, Müzeyyen ASTARCI, Gülfer AKBAY, Mehtap AYDIN, Meral EKŞİOĞLU

Effects of Peer and Group Education on Knowledge, Beliefs and Breast Self-Examination Practice among University Students in Turkey

Tuna Arzu MALAK, Aklime DİCLE, Özgül KARAYURT

Postural Stability and Functional Capacity in Recreational Athletes with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Ufuk ŞEKİR, Yavuz YILDIZ, Taner AYDIN, Bülent HAZNECİ, Ferhat DENİZ, Tolga SAKA