Diagnostic value of 3D power Doppler ultrasound in the characterization of thyroid nodules

Diagnostic value of 3D power Doppler ultrasound in the characterization of thyroid nodules

Background/aim: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of vascular indices obtained using 3D power Doppler ultrasound(3D PDUS) in differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules.Materials and methods: Sixty-seven patients (56 female, 11 male, mean age 44.6) with 81 thyroid nodules exhibiting mixed (peripheraland central) vascularization patterns, with the largest diameter between 10 and 30 mm, were prospectively evaluated using 3D PDUS.Nodule volume, vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI), and vascularization flow index (VFI) were calculated using the VirtualOrgan Computer-aided Analysis (VOCAL) software, and these indices were then compared with regard to the cytohistopathologybased diagnosis. The optimum cutoff values for the differentiation of benign and malignant nodules were identified, and diagnosticefficacy was calculated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.Results: Fifty-six of the 81 nodules included in this study were diagnosed as benign and 25 as malignant. Vascular indices in malignantnodules were significantly higher than those in benign nodules (P < 0.05). In benign nodules, the mean VI was 11.61 ± 6.88, mean FI was39.75 ± 3.93, and mean VFI was 4.82 ± 2.94, compared to 18.64 ± 12.81, 41.82 ± 4.43, and 8.17 ± 6.37, respectively, in malignant nodules.The area under the curves (AUCs) was calculated as 0.68, 0.61, and 0.67 for VI, FI, and VFI, respectively. At optimal cutoff values of 10.2for VI, 40.8 for FI, and 5.5 for VFI, the sensitivity and specificity were 72%/55.4%, 68%/57.1%, and 68%/67.9%, respectively.Conclusion: 3D PDUS can be useful in the characterization of thyroid nodules.

___

  • 1. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid 2016; 26 (1): 1-133. doi:10.1089/thy.2015.0020
  • 2. Guth S, Theune U, Aberle J, Galach A, Bamberger CM. Very high prevalence of thyroid nodules detected by high frequency (13 MHz) ultrasound examination. European Journal of Clinical Investigation 2009; 39 (8): 699-706. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02162.x
  • 3. Hegedus L. Clinical practice. The thyroid nodule. The New England Journal of Medicine 2004; 351 (17): 1764-1771.
  • 4. Enewold L, Harlan LC, Stevens JL, Sharon E. Thyroid cancer presentation and treatment in the United States. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2015; 22 86): 1789-1797. doi: 10.1245/ s10434-014-4209-1
  • 5. Dirikoç A, Fakı S, Başer H, Özdemir D, Aydın C et al. Thyroid malignancy risk in different clinical thyroid diseases. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 2017; 47: 1509-1519. doi: 10.3906/ sag-1611-67
  • 6. Yang J, Schnadig V, Logrono R, Wasserman PG. Fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules: a study of 4703 patients with histologic and clinical correlations. Cancer 2007; 111 (5): 306- 315.
  • 7. Oliver C, Vaillant-Lombard J, Albarel F, Berbis J, Veyrières JB et al. What is the contribution of elastography to thyroid nodules evaluation? Annales d’Endocrinologie (Paris) 2011; 72 (2): 120-124. doi: 10.1016/j.ando.2011.03.016
  • 8. Downey DB, Fenster A, Williams JC. Clinical utility of threedimensional US. Radiographics 2000; 20 (2): 559-571.
  • 9. Baig FN, Lunenburg JTJV, Liu SYW, Yip SP, Law HKW et al. Computer-aided assessment of regional vascularity of thyroid nodules for prediction of malignancy. Scientific Reports 2017; 7: 14350. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14432-7
  • 10. Noguchi J, Tanaka H, Koyanagi A, Miyake K, Hata T. Threedimensional power Doppler indices at 18-22 weeks’ gestation for prediction of fetal growth restriction or pregnancy-induced hypertension. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2015; 292 (1): 75-79. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3603-z
  • 11. Kudla MJ, Alcázar JL. Does sphere volume affect the performance of three-dimensional power Doppler virtual vascular sampling for predicting malignancy in vascularized solid or cystic-solid adnexal masses? Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 2010; 35 (5): 602-608. doi: 10.1002/uog.7601.
  • 12. Pairleitner H, Steiner H, Hasenoehrl G, Staudach A. Threedimensional power Doppler sonography: imaging and quantifying blood flow and vascularization. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 1999; 14 (2): 139-143.
  • 13. Marret H, Sauget S, Giraudeau B, Body G, Tranquart F. Power Doppler vascularity index for predicting malignancy of adnexal masses. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 2005; 25 (5): 508-513.
  • 14. Galván R, Mercé L, Jurado M, Mínguez JA, López-García G et al. Three-dimensional power Doppler angiography in endometrial cancer: correlation with tumor characteristics. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 2010; 35 (6): 723-729.
  • 15. Chang YC, Huang YS, Huang CS, Chen JH, Chang RF. Intrinsic subtypes and tumor grades in breast cancer are associated with distinct 3-D power Doppler sonographic vascular features. European Journal of Radiology 2014; 83 (8): 1368-1374. doi: 10.1016/j. ejrad.2014.05.005
  • 16. Belitsos P, Papoutsis D, Rodolakis A, Mesogitis S, Antsaklis A. Three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound for the study of cervical cancer and precancerous lesions. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 2012; 40 (5): 576-581. doi: 10.1002/ uog.11134
  • 17. Slapa RZ, Jakubowski WS, Slowinska-Srzednicka J, Szopinski KT. Advantages and disadvantages of 3D ultrasound of thyroid nodules including thin slice volume rendering. Thyroid Research 2011; 4 (1): 1. doi: 10.1186/1756-6614-4-1
  • 18. Li WB, Zhang B, Jiang YX, Zhu QL, Zhang Q et al. Value of Quantitative Three-dimensional Doppler Ultrasound in the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao 2015; 37 (3): 300-304. doi: 10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.2015.03.010
  • 19. Jang M, Kim SM, Lyou CY, Choi BS, Choi SI et al. Differentiating benign from malignant thyroid nodules: comparison of 2- and 3- dimensional sonography. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 2012; 31 (2): 197-204.
  • 20. Slapa RZ, Slowinska-Srzednicka J, Szopinski KT, Jakubowski W. Gray-scale three-dimensional sonography of thyroid nodules: feasibility of the method and preliminary studies. European Radiology 2006; 16 (2): 428-436.
  • 21. Gharib H, Papini E, Valcavi R, Baskin HJ, Crescenzi A et al. AACE/AME Task Force on Thyroid Nodules. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and Associazione Medici Endocrinologi medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules. Endocrine Practice 2006; 12 (1): 63-102.
  • 22. Papini E, Guglielmi R, Bianchini A, Crescenzi A, Taccogna S et al. Risk of malignancy in nonpalpable thyroid nodules: predictive value of ultrasound and color-Doppler features. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2002; 87 (5): 1941-1946.
  • 23. Chan BK, Desser TS, McDougall IR, Weigel RJ, Jeffrey RB Jr. Common and uncommon sonographic features of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 2003; 22 (10): 1083-1090.
  • 24. Carraro R, Molinari F, Deandrea M, Garberoglio R, Suri JS. Characterization of thyroid nodules by 3-D contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society; Vancouver, BC, Canada. pp. 2229-2232. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4649639
  • 25. Molinari F, Mantovani A, Deandrea M, Limone P, Garberoglio R et al. Characterization of single thyroid nodules by contrast-enhanced 3-D Ultrasound. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology 2010; 36 (10): 1616-1625. doi:10.1016/j. ultrasmedbio.2010.07.011
  • 26. Nemec U, Nemec SF, Novotny C, Weber M, Czerny C et al. Quantitative evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound after intravenous administration of a microbubble contrast agent for differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: assessment of diagnostic accuracy. European Radiology 2012; 22 (6): 1357-1365. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2385-6
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0144
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK