Diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in cervical lymph nodes: a comparative study

Background/aim: To investigate the potential diagnostic value of point shear wave elastography (pSWE) and the contribution of concurrent diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) to diagnostic performance in patients with cervical lymphadenopathy. Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study included 116 cervical lymph nodes of 94 patients. All lymph nodes were evaluated before the treatment or histopathological sampling. Gray scale ultrasonographic features, elastographic stiffness and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were measured and recorded. Lymph nodes were divided into benign and malignant groups with histopathological findings. Results: Short axis measurement, axis ratio, hilum morphology, vascularization patterns, pSWE, and ADC values were the most significant parameters in logistic regression tests. The median stiffness of malignant nodes was higher and the mean ADC values were lower than others. Also, lymphoproliferative disorders had the lowest ADC values (p < 0.001). Area under the curve values for pSWE and DW-MRI were 0.852 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.779–0.925], 0.790 (95% CI, 0.695–0.885), respectively. The accuracy rate increased from 79.3% to 85.3% when the pSWE was combined with the ultrasonography (US). Conclusion: The use of pSWE combined with conventional US will reduce the number of biopsies and may be sufficient to differentiate the lymph nodes.Key words: Lymph nodes, ultrasound, sonoelastography, diffusion weighted MRI

PDF

___

1. Vassallo P, Wernecke K, Roos N, Peters P. Differentiation of benign from malignant superficial lymphadenopathy: the role of high-resolution US. Radiology 1992; 183 (1): 215-220. doi: 10.1148/radiology.183.1.1549675.
2. Ahuja A, Ying M. An overview of neck node sonography. Investigative Radiology 2002; 37 (6): 333-342. doi: 10.1097/00004424-200206000-00005.
3. Van den Brekel M, Castelijns JA, Snow GB. Detection of lymph node metastases in the neck: radiologic criteria. Radiology 1994; 192 (3): 617-618. doi: 10.1148/radiology.192.3.8058923.
4. Lyshchik A, Higashi T, Asato R, Tanaka S, Ito J, et al. Thyroid gland tumor diagnosis at US elastography. Radiology 2005; 237 (1): 202-211. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2363041248.
5. Altay C, Seçil M. Sonoelastografinin Temel İlkeleri. Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri 2019; 7: 1-12 (in Turkish). doi: 10.5152/ trs.2019.749.
6. Athanasiou A, Tardivon A, Tanter M, Sigal-Zafrani B, Bercoff J, et al. Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging-preliminary results. Radiology 2010; 256 (1): 297-303. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10090385.
7. Sebag F, Vaillant-Lombard J, Berbis J, Griset V, Henry J, et al. Shear wave elastography: a new ultrasound imaging mode for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 2010; 95 (12): 5281-5288. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-0766.
8. Razek AAKA, Soliman NY, Elkhamary S, Alsharaway MK, Tawfik A. Role of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in cervical lymphadenopathy. European Radiology 2006; 16 (7): 1468- 1477. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-0133-x.
9. Wang J, Takashima S, Takayama F, Kawakami S, Saito A, et al. Head and neck lesions: characterization with diffusionweighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 2001; 220 (3): 621-630. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2202010063.
10. Koh D-M, Collins DJ. Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology. American Journal of Roentgenology 2007; 188 (6): 1622-1635. doi: 10.2214/ AJR.06.1403.
11. Tandon S, Shahab R, Benton JI, Ghosh SK, Sheard J, et al. Fine-needle aspiration cytology in a regional head and neck cancer center: comparison with a systematic review and metaanalysis. Head Neck 2008; 30: 1246-1252. doi.org/10.1002/ hed.20849.
12. Herd MK, Woods M, Anand R, Habib A, Brennan PA. Lymphoma presenting in the neck: current concepts in diagnosis. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2012; 50: 309–313. doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.03.263.
13. Som PM, Curtin HD, Mancuso AA. Imaging-based nodal classification for evaluation of neck metastatic adenopathy. American Journal of Roentgenology 2000; 174 (3): 837-844. doi: 10.2214/ajr.174.3.1740837.
14. Choi K, Kong D, Hah Z, Lee H. A reliability index of shear wave speed measurement for shear wave elastography. IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, Taipei, Taiwan 2015, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.1109/ULTSYM.2015.0382.
15. Mulabecirovic A, Mjelle AB, Gilja OH, Vesterhus M, Havre RF. Repeatability of shear wave elastography in liver fibrosis phantoms-evaluation of five different systems. PLOS ONE 2018; 13 (1): e0189671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189671.
16. Sporea I, Gradinaru-Tascau O, Bota S, Popescu A, Sirli R, et al. How many measurements are needed for liver stiffness assessment by 2D-Shear Wave Elastography (2D-SWE) and which value should be used: the mean or median? Medical Ultrasonography 2013; 15 (4): 268-272. doi: 10.11152/ mu.2013.2066.154.isp2.
17. Esen G. Ultrasound of superficial lymph nodes. European Journal of Radiology 2006; 58 (3): 345-359. doi: 10.1016/j. ejrad.2005.12.039.
18. Van den Brekel M, Castelijns JA, Snow GB. The size of lymph nodes in the neck on sonograms as a radiologic criterion for metastasis: how reliable is it? American Journal of Neuroradiology 1998; 19 (4): 695-700. PMID: 9576657.
19. Curtin HD, Ishwaran H, Mancuso AA, Dalley RW, Caudry DJ, et al. Comparison of CT and MR imaging in staging of neck metastases. Radiology 1998; 207 (1): 123-130. doi: 10.1148/ radiology.207.1.9530307.
20. Van den Brekel M, Castelijns JA, Stel HV, Luth W, Valk J, et al. Occult metastatic neck disease: detection with US and USguided fine-needle aspiration cytology. Radiology 1991; 180 (2): 457-461. doi: 10.1148/radiology.180.2.2068312.
21. Suh CH, Choi YJ, Baek JH, Lee JH. The diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography for malignant cervical lymph nodes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Radiology 2017; 27 (1): 222-230. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4378-3.
22. Hajek PC, Salomonowitz E, Turk R, Tscholakoff D, Kumpan W, et al. Lymph nodes of the neck: evaluation with US. Radiology 1986; 158 (3): 739-742. doi: 10.1148/radiology.158.3.3511503.
23. Shozushima M, Suzuki M, Nakasima T, Yanagisawa Y, Sakamaki K, et al. Ultrasound diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in head and neck cancer. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 1990; 19 (4): 165-170. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.19.4.2097226.
24. Van den Brekel M, Castelijns J, Stel H, Golding R, Meyer C, et al. Modern imaging techniques and ultrasound-guided aspiration cytology for the assessment of neck node metastases: a prospective comparative study. European Archives of Oto-rhino-laryngology 1993; 250 (1): 11-17. doi: 10.1007/ BF00176941.
25. Lyshchik A, Higashi T, Asato R, Tanaka S, Ito J, et al. Cervical lymph node metastases: diagnosis at sonoelastography-initial experience. Radiology 2007; 243 (1): 258-267. doi: 10.1148/ radiol.2431052032.
26. Ying M, Ahuja A, Brook F, Brown B, Metreweli C. Nodal shape (S/L) and its combination with size for assessment of cervical lymphadenopathy: which cut-off should be used? Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology 1999; 25 (8): 1169-1175. doi: 10.1016/ S0301-5629(99)00075-7.
27. Dudea SM, Lenghel M, Vasilescu D, Duma MM. Ultrasonography of superficial lymph nodes: benign vs. malignant. Medical Ultrasonography 2012; 14 (4): 294-306. PMID: 23243643.
28. Gupta A, Rahman K, Shahid M, Kumar A, Qaseem SD, et al. Sonographic assessment of cervical lymphadenopathy: role of high-resolution and color Doppler imaging. Head & Neck 2011; 33 (3): 297-302. doi: 10.1002/hed.21448.
29. Ying M, Ahuja A, Brook F, Brown B, Metreweli C. Sonographic appearance and distribution of normal cervical lymph nodes in a Chinese population. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 1996; 15 (6): 431-436. doi: 10.7863/jum.1996.15.6.431.
30. Evans R, Ahuja A, Metreweli C. The linear echogenic hilus in cervical lymphadenopathy-a sign of benignity or malignancy? Clinical Radiology 1993; 47 (4): 262-264. doi: 10.1016/S0009- 9260(05)81135-3.
31. Wu CH, Shih JC, Chang YL, Lee SY, Hsieh FJ. Twodimensional and three-dimensional power Doppler sonographic classification of vascular patterns in cervical lymphadenopathies. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 1998; 17 (7): 459-464. doi: 10.7863/jum.1998.17.7.459.
32. Ahuja AT, Ying M, Ho SSY, Metreweli C. Distribution of intranodal vessels in differentiating benign from metastatic neck nodes. Clinical Radiology 2001; 56 (3): 197-201. doi: 10.1053/crad.2000.0574.
33. Dragoni F, Cartoni C, Pescarmona E, Chiarotti F, Puopolo M, et al. The role of high resolution pulsed and color Doppler ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant lymphadenopathy. Cancer 1999; 85 (11): 2485-2490. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19990601)85:11<2485::aidcncr26>3.0.co;2-y.
34. Fujiwara T, Tomokuni J, Iwanaga K, Ooba S, Haji T. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging for reactive and malignant/metastatic cervical lymph nodes. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology 2013; 39 (7): 1178-1183. doi: 10.1016/j. ultrasmedbio.2013.02.001.
35. Meng W, Xing P, Chen Q, Wu C. Initial experience of acoustic radiation force impulse ultrasound imaging of cervical lymph nodes. European Journal of Radiology 2013; 82 (10): 1788- 1792. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.05.039.
36. Shah KK, Pritt BS, Alexander MP. Histopathologic review of granulomatous inflammation. Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases 2017; 7: 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j. jctube.2017.02.001.
37. Ghai S, Pattison J, Ghai S, O’Malley ME, Khalili K, et al. Primary gastrointestinal lymphoma: spectrum of imaging findings with pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2007; 27 (5): 1371-1388. doi: 10.1148/rg.275065151.
38. Lasecki M, Olchowy C, Sokolowska-Dabek D, Biel A, Chaber R, et al. Modified sonoelastographic scale score for lymph node assessment in lymphoma-a preliminary report. Journal of Ultrasonography 2015; 15 (60): 45. doi: 10.15557/ JoU.2015.0004.
39. Azizi G, Keller JM, Mayo ML, Piper K, Puett D, et al. Shear wave elastography and cervical lymph nodes: predicting malignancy. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology 2016; 42 (6): 1273-1281. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.01.012.
40. Cheng KL, Choi YJ, Shim WH, Lee JH, Baek JH. Virtual touch tissue imaging quantification shear wave elastography: prospective assessment of cervical lymph nodes. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology 2016; 42 (2): 378-386. doi: 10.1016/j. ultrasmedbio.2015.10.003.
41. Perrone A, Guerrisi P, Izzo L, D’Angeli I, Sassi S, et al. Diffusionweighted MRI in cervical lymph nodes: differentiation between benign and malignant lesions. European Journal of Radiology 2011; 77 (2): 281-286. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.07.039
42. De Bondt R, Hoeberigs M, Nelemans P, Deserno W, PeutzKootstra C, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and additional value of diffusion-weighted imaging for discrimination of malignant cervical lymph nodes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Neuroradiology 2009; 51 (3): 183-192. doi: 10.1007/s00234-008-0487-2.
43. King AD, Ahuja AT, Yeung DK, Fong DK, Lee YY, et al. Malignant cervical lymphadenopathy: diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 2007; 245 (3): 806- 813. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2451061804.
44. Alam F, Naito K, Horiguchi J, Fukuda H, Tachikake T, et al. Accuracy of sonographic elastography in the differential diagnosis of enlarged cervical lymph nodes: comparison with conventional B-mode sonography. American Journal of Roentgenology 2008; 191 (2): 604-610. doi: 10.2214/ AJR.07.3401.
45. Knappe M, Louw M, Gregor RT. Ultrasonography-guided fineneedle aspiration for the assessment of cervical metastases. Archives of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery 2000; 126 (9): 1091-1096. doi: 10.1001/archotol.126.9.1091.