Diagnostic efficacy of routine contrast-enhanced abdominal CT for the assessment of osteoporosis in the Turkish population
Diagnostic efficacy of routine contrast-enhanced abdominal CT for the assessment of osteoporosis in the Turkish population
Background/aim: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of vertebral Hounsfield unit (HU) values on routine contrastenhancedabdominal computed tomography (CT) scans for the assessment of osteoporosis using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry(DXA) T-scores as a reference standard.Materials and methods: A total of 111 consecutive patients who underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal CT examination for anyindication and DXA within a 6-month period were retrospectively analyzed. The CT attenuation values of trabecular bone in HUs weremeasured in axial and sagittal planes from lumbar vertebrae 1–4 (L1–L4). The correlation between the DXA T-scores and HU valuesmeasured on the CT scans was evaluated by Pearson’s correlation test. Areas under the curves (AUCs) were calculated by receiveroperating characteristic analysis for diagnostic proficiency, and threshold values were determined. Paired t-test and Bland–Altman plottest were used to evaluate the correlation between axial and sagittal HU values.Results: There was a strong correlation between the DXA T-scores and HU values of all the lumbar vertebrae (P < 0.001). The highestcorrelation was for the L3 vertebra; L3 was thus chosen for additional analyses. The mean axial and sagittal L3 attenuations were 133.7HU and 131.9 HU, respectively. The axial measurements were not significantly different from the sagittal measurements, with a meandifference of 1.8 HU (P > 0.05). The L3 axial CT attenuation threshold for 90% sensitivity was 170 HU and that for 90% specificity was102 HU for distinguishing osteoporosis from osteopenia and normal bone mineral density (BMD). To distinguish the low BMD groupfrom the normal group, the L3 axial CT attenuation threshold for approximately 90% sensitivity was 102 HU and for 90% specificitywas 165 HU.Conclusion: The HUs derived from routine contrast-enhanced abdominal CT scans can be used for the evaluation of osteoporosis,without additional radiation exposure and cost.
___
- 1. National Institute of Health. Consensus Development
Conference: Diagnosis, prophylaxis and treatment of
osteoporosis. American Journal of Medicine 1993; 94: 645-650.
- 2. Cohen AJ, Roe FJC. Review of risk factors for osteoporosis with
particular reference to a possible aetiological role of dietary
salt. Food and Chemical Toxicology 2000; 38: 237-253.
- 3. Gullberg B, Johnell O, Kanis JA. World-wide projections for
hip fracture. Osteoporosis International 1997; 7: 407-413.
- 4. Cooper C, Campion G, Melton L 3rd. Hip fractures in the
elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporosis International
1992; 2: 285-289.
- 5. Masi L. Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Clinical Cases in
Mineral and Bone Metabolism 2008; 5: 11-13.
- 6. WHO. WHO Scientific Group Report on the Assessment of
Osteoporosis at Primary Health Care Level. Report of a WHO
Scientific Group; Summary Meeting Report. Brussels, Belgium,
5–7 May 2004. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2004.
- 7. Leslie WD, Giangregorio LM, Yogendran M, Azimaee M,
Morin S et al. A population-based analysis of the postfracture
care gap 1996-2008: the situation is not improving.
Osteoporosis International 2012; 23: 1623-1629.
- 8. Watts NB. Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry
using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Osteoporosis
International 2004; 15: 847-854.
- 9. Carberry GA, Pooler BD, Binkley N, Lauder TB, Bruce RJ
et al. Unreported vertebral body compression fractures at
abdominal multidetector CT. Radiology 2013; 268: 120-126.
- 10. Pickhardt PJ, Bodeen G, Brett A, Brown JK, Binkley N.
Comparison of femoral neck BMD evaluation obtained using
lunar DXA and QCT with asynchronous calibration from CT
colonography. Journal of Clinical Densitometry 2015; 18: 5-12.
- 11. Pickhardt PJ, Lee LJ, Del Rio AM, Lauder T, Bruce RJ et al.
Simultaneous screening for osteoporosis at CT colonography:
bone mineral density assessment using MDCT attenuation
techniques compared with the DXA reference standard.
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 2011; 26: 2194-2203.
- 12. Pickhardt PJ, Pooler BD, Lauder T, Del Rio AM, Bruce RJ et
al. Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using abdominal
computed tomography scans obtained for other indications.
Annals of Internal Medicine 2013; 158: 588-595.
- 13. Summers RM, Baecher N, Yao J, Liu J, Pickhardt PJ et
al. Feasibility of simultaneous computed tomographic
colonography and fully automate bone mineral densitometry
in a single examination. Journal of Computer Assisted
Tomography 2011; 35: 212-216.
- 14. Gausden EB, Nwachukwu BU, Schreiber JJ, Lorich DG,
Lane JM. Opportunistic use of CT imaging for osteoporosis
screening and bone density assessment: a qualitative systematic
review. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 2017; 99: 1580-1590.
- 15. Pickhardt PJ, Lauder T, Pooler BD, Del Rio AM, Rosas H et
al. Effect of IV contrast on lumbar trabecular attenuation at
routine abdominal CT: correlation with DXA and implications
for opportunistic osteoporosis screening. Osteoporosis
International 2016; 27: 147-152.
- 16. Pompe E, Willemink MJ, Dijkhuis GR, Verhaar HJJ, Mohamed
Hoesein FAA et al. Intravenous contrast injection significantly
affects bone mineral density measured on CT. European
Radiology 2015; 25: 283-289.
- 17. Alacreu E, Moratal D, Arana E. Opportunistic screening for
osteoporosis by routine CT in Southern Europe. Osteoporosis
International 2017; 28: 983-990.
- 18. Ward RJ, Roberts CC, Bencardino JT, Arnold E, Baccei SJ et al.
ACR appropriateness criteria: Osteoporosis and bone mineral
density. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2017;
14: S189-S202.
- 19. Kara K, Sivrioglu AK, Aribal S, Ozyürek S, Saglam M et al.
The diagnosis of osteoporosis by measuring lumbar vertebrae
density with MDCT: a comparative study with quantitative
computerized tomography (QCT). Acta Medica Mediterranea
2013; 29: 775-779.
- 20. Lee SJ, Binkley N, Lubner MG, Bruce RJ, Ziemlewicz TJ et al.
Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using the sagittal
reconstruction from routine abdominal CT for combined
assessment of vertebral fractures and density. Osteoporosis
International 2016; 27: 1131-1136.