Comparison of nasal senses following open and closed rhinoplasty

Comparison of nasal senses following open and closed rhinoplasty

Background/aim: The objective of this study was to compare the postoperative changes taking place in the nasal senses of patients who underwent a rhinoplasty through the open or closed incision method. Materials and methods: In a prospective study, 15 patients had a closed rhinoplasty surgery and 15 others had an open one. By pinpointing 9 spots in the nose, a sensory assessment was made by means of Semmes Weinstein monofilaments prior to the surgery and 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months after the surgery. Results: In the open and closed groups, there was hypoesthesia 1 week after the surgery compared with the preoperative period (P = 0.01 and P = 0.016). In the first week a sense reduction in the upper columella was observed in the open group when compared with the closed one (P = 0.035). There were no other significant differences between the groups in the nasal regions at other times. Conclusion: It was ascertained that there was reduced sensation in the upper columella in the open incision group in the first postoperative week. The sensation was reduced in both groups in the first postoperative week. The nasal sensation recovered after the first month.

___

  • 1. Thompson AC. Nasal tip numbness following rhinoplasty. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1987; 12: 143–144.
  • 2. Bafaqeeh SA, al-Qattan MM. Alterations in nasal sensibility following open rhinoplasty. Br J Plast Surg 1998; 51: 508–510.
  • 3. Rettinger G. Risks and complications in rhinoplasty. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 6: Doc08.
  • 4. Bakhshaeekia A, Ghiasi-Hafezi S. Comparing the alteration of nasal tip sensibility and sensory recovery time following open rhinoplasty with and without soft tissue removal. Plast Surg Int 2012; 2012: 415781.
  • 5. Healy C, LeQuesne PM, Lynn B. Collateral sprouting of cutaneous nerves in man. Brain 1996; 119: 2063–2072.
  • 6. Aszmann OC, Muse V, Dellon AL. Evidence in support of collateral sprouting after sensory nerve resection. Ann Plast Surg 1996; 37: 520–525.
  • 7. Ghazipour A, Sarafraz M, Ahmadi Noudeh KH, Mohammadi HA. Comparative evaluation of nasal sensibility alteration following rhinoplasty with open and close approaches. Jundishapur Scientific Medical Journal 2009; 7: 485–490.
  • 8. Zide BM. Nasal anatomy: the muscles and tip sensation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1985; 9: 193–196.
  • 9. Han SK, Shin YW, Kim WK. Anatomy of the external nasal nerve. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114: 1055–1059.
  • 10. Meyer M, Moss AL, Cullen KW. Infraorbital nerve palsy after rhinoplasty. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1990; 18: 173–174.
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0144
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK