Comparison of latanoprost, brimonidine tartrate, and bimatoprost plus timolol maleate in fixed combinations
To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy of fixed-combination antiglaucoma agents, and to evaluate the effect of these drugs on the visual field and optic disk morphology. Materials and methods: Included in this retrospective study were 17 eyes receiving latanoprost 0.005% + timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination (group 1), 18 eyes receiving brimonidine tartrate 0.2% + timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination (group 2), and 16 eyes receiving bimatoprost 0.03% + timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination (group 3), all with the diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Intraocular pressure was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometer, a visual field test was performed, and optic disk morphology was evaluated by optic coherence tomography before the initiation of treatment and at the end of the follow-up period. The results were compared statistically. Results: All 3 fixed-combination drugs reduced IOP significantly compared to the baseline (for all groups, P < 0.001), although it was more pronounced in the group receiving the bimatoprost 0.03% + timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination. No significant change was seen in the visual field and optic disk morphology in any group. Conclusion: All 3 fixed combinations are effective in lowering IOP and preserving the visual field and optic disk morphology.
Comparison of latanoprost, brimonidine tartrate, and bimatoprost plus timolol maleate in fixed combinations
To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy of fixed-combination antiglaucoma agents, and to evaluate the effect of these drugs on the visual field and optic disk morphology. Materials and methods: Included in this retrospective study were 17 eyes receiving latanoprost 0.005% + timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination (group 1), 18 eyes receiving brimonidine tartrate 0.2% + timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination (group 2), and 16 eyes receiving bimatoprost 0.03% + timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination (group 3), all with the diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Intraocular pressure was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometer, a visual field test was performed, and optic disk morphology was evaluated by optic coherence tomography before the initiation of treatment and at the end of the follow-up period. The results were compared statistically. Results: All 3 fixed-combination drugs reduced IOP significantly compared to the baseline (for all groups, P < 0.001), although it was more pronounced in the group receiving the bimatoprost 0.03% + timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination. No significant change was seen in the visual field and optic disk morphology in any group. Conclusion: All 3 fixed combinations are effective in lowering IOP and preserving the visual field and optic disk morphology.
___
- Thapa SS, Paudyal I, Khanal S, Twyana SN, Paudyal G, Gurung R et al. A population-based survey of the prevalence and types of glaucoma in Nepal: the Bhaktapur Glaucoma Study. Ophthalmology 2012; 119: 759–64.
- Wang YX, Xu L, Yang H, Jonas JB. Prevalence of glaucoma in North China: the Beijing Eye Study. Am J Ophthalmol 2010; 150: 917–24.
- European Glaucoma Society. Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma. 3rd ed. Savona: Dogma; 2009. p.124–45.
- Schwenn O, Heckmann B, Guzy C, Miller PJ. Long-term effect of latanoprost/timolol fixed combination in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension: a prospective, observational, noninterventional study. BMC Ophthalmol 2010; 10: 21.
- Cantofanti M, Oddone F, Vetrugno M, Manni G, Fogagnolo P, Tanga L. Efficacy of the fixed combinations of bimatoprost or latanoprost plus timolol in patients uncontrolled with prostaglandin monotherapy: a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, clinical study. Eur J Ophthalmol 2009; 19: 66–
- Garcia-Feijoo J, Saenz-Frances F, Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Mendez-Hernandez C, Fernandez-Vidal A, Calvo-Gonzalez C et al. Comparison of ocular hypotensive actions of fixed combinations of brimonidine/timolol and dorzolamide/ timolol. Curr Med Res Opin 2010; 26: 1599–606.
- Lanzl I, Raber T. Efficacy and tolerability of the fixed combination of brinzolamide 1% and timolol 0.5% in daily practice. Clin Ophthalmol 2011; 5: 291–8.
- Nixon DR, Yan DB, Chartrand JP, Piemontesi RL, Simonyi S, Hollander DA. Three-month, randomized, parallel-group comparison of brimonidine-timolol versus dorzolamidetimolol fixed-combination therapy. Curr Med Res Opin 2009; 25: 1645–53.
- Jothi R, Ismail AM, Senthamarai R, Pal S. A comparative study on the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of bimatoprost/ timolol and dorzolamide/timolol combinations in glaucoma patients. Indian J Pharmacol 2010; 42: 362–5.
- Januleviciene I, Ehrlich R, Siesky B, Nedzelskiené I, Harris A. Visual function, optic nerve structure, and ocular blood flow parameters after 1 year of glaucoma treatment with fixed combinations. Eur J Ophthalmol 2009; 19: 790–7.
- Chauhan BC, Mikelberg FS, Balaszi AG, LeBlanc RP, Lesk MR, Trope GE et al. Canadian Glaucoma Study: 2. risk factors for the progression of open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2008; 126: 1030–6.
- Kanamori A, Nagai-Kusuhara A, Escafio MFT, Maeda H, Nakamura M, Negi A. Comparison of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, scanning laser polarimetry and optical coherence tomography to discriminate ocular hypertension and glaucoma at an early stage. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2006; 244: 58–68.
- Leung CK, Ye C, Weinreb RN, Cheung CY, Qiu Q, Liu S et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography a study on diagnostic agreement with Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph. Ophthalmology 2010; 117: 267–74.
- Naithani P, Sihota R, Sony P, Dada T, Gupta V, Kondal D et al. Evaluation of optical coherence tomography and Heidelberg retinal tomography parameters in detecting early and moderate glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 3138–45.