An analysis of HER-2/neu gene status in invasive ductal carcinomas using immunohistochemistry and fl uorescence in situ hybridization

Amaç: İnvaziv meme karsinomalarında HER-2/neu gen durumunu belirlemek için immünohistokimya (İHK) ve fl uoresan in situ hibridizasyon (FİSH) en sık olarak kullanılan 2 metotdur. Çalışmamızdaki amacımız invaziv duktal karsinoma olgularımızda HER-2/neu geni için İHK ve FİSH ile elde edilen sonuçlar arasındaki uyumu analiz etmekti. Yöntem ve gereç: Çalışmaya invaziv duktal karsinoma tanısı konmuş 59 kadın hasta dahil edildi. Ortalama yaş 57,8 idi. Aksiller lenf düğümü durumu, aksiller disseksiyon uygulanmış 30 hastada değerlendirilebildi. HER-2/neu gen ekspresyonu ve amplifikasyonu primer tümör dokularında İHK ve FİSH metotları ile analiz edildi. İHK analizini yorumlamak için skor 0, 1+, 2+ ve 3+ şeklinde skorlama uygulanırken HER-2/neu : CEP17 oranı 2 ve üzerinde olan olgular HER-2/neu gene amplifi kasyonu için pozitif kabul edildi. Bulgular: Çalışmamızda olguların tamamı dikkate alındığında HER-2/neu gen amplifi kasyon oranı % 28,8 (17 olgu) iken bu oran lenf düğümü pozitif grupta % 48 (12 olgu) idi. Serimizde HER-2/neu aşırı ekspresyon (skor 3+) oranı % 11,9 olarak saptandı (7 olgu). HER-2/neu gen amplifi kasyonu tümör derecesi ile ilişkiliydi (P < 0,05). İHK ve FİSH sonuçları arasındaki ilişki anlamlıydı (P < 0,001). Skore 3+ olan olguların tümü FİSH pozitif iken skor 0 olanların % 97’si, skor 1+ olanların % 44’ü FİSH negatif idi. Skore 2+ olguların % 80’ inde HER-2/neu gen amplifi kasyonu saptandı. Lenf düğümü pozitif skor 0, 2+ ve 3+ olgularda İHK ve FİSH sonuçları arasındaki uyum oranı % 100 iken skor 1+ olgularda bu oran % 29 idi. Sonuç: Sonuç olarak, kendi serimizdeki HER-2/neu aşırı ekspresyon oranı (% 11,9) literatürde rapor edilmiş oranlardan düşük iken HER-2/neu gen amplifikasyon oranı (% 28,8) literatür ile uyumluydu. Çalışmamızda HER-2/neu gen amplifikasyonu tümör derecesi ile ilişkiliydi. Skor 2+ ve 3+ olgularda HER-2/neu aşırı ekspresyon ve gen amplifikasyon sonuçları arasındaki uyum oranı yüksek iken skor 1+ olgulardaki uyumsuzluk oranı diğer rapor edilmiş oranlara göre daha yüksekti. Pozitif lenf düğümlü skor 1+ olgulardaki uyumsuzluk oranı total çalışma grubununkinden daha yüksekti. Sonuçlarımıza göre, HER-2/neu için skor 1+ immünboyanma daha belirsiz bir sonuçtu ve metastatik hasta grubunda skor 1+ olgular çalışma grubunun tamamından daha yüksek HER-2/neu gen amplifikasyon oranına sahipti. Sonuçlarımız, özellikle aksiller lenf düğümü pozitif olan skor 1+ olgularda HER-2/neu gen durumunun FİSH analizi ile değerlendirilmesi gerektiğine işaret etmektedir.

İnvaziv duktal karsinomalarda immünohistokimya ve floresan in situ hibridizasyonu ile HER-2/neu gen analizi

Aim: To determine the concordance rates between results from immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays for the HER-2/neu gene in cases of invasive ductal carcinoma. IHC and FISH are 2 of the most frequently used methods to determine HER-2/neu gene status in invasive breast carcinomas. Materials and methods: The present study includes 59 female patients with invasive ductal carcinoma. The mean age was 57.8 years. Axillary lymph node status could be evaluated in 30 patients with axillary dissection. HER-2/neu gene overexpression and amplification were analyzed in primary tumor tissues by IHC and FISH assays, respectively. The evaluation of the IHC assay was performed using a score of 0, 1+, 2+, or 3+, while a HER-2/neu-to-CEP17 ratio greater than 2 was accepted as positive for HER-2/neu gene amplification. Results: The overall rate of HER-2/neu gene amplification was 28.8% (17 cases) among all members of the study group, while this rate was 48% (12 cases) in the group with axillary lymph node metastasis. The rate of HER-2/neu overexpression (score of 3+) was 11.9% (7 cases). HER-2/neu gene amplification was associated with tumor grade (P < 0.05). There was a significant relationship between the results of the IHC and FISH assays (P < 0.001). All of the cases with a score of 3+ were FISH-positive, while 97% of cases with a score of 0 and 44% of cases with a score of 1+ were FISH-negative. HER-2/neu gene amplifi cation was determined in 80% of the cases with a score of 2+. Among cases with positive lymph node status, the concordance rates were 100% in cases with scores of 0, 2+, and 3+, while this rate was found to be 29% in cases with a score of 1+. Conclusion: Our found rate (11.9%) of HER-2/neu overexpression was lower than the rates reported in the literature, while our HER-2/neu gene amplification rate (28.8%) was compatible with the reported rates. HER-2/neu gene amplification was associated with tumor grade. Although high rates of concordance between HER-2/neu gene overexpression and amplification in cases with scores of 2+ and 3+ were obtained, the discordance rate in cases with a score of 1+ was higher than those of other studies. The discordance rate in cases with a score of 1+ and positive lymph node status was higher than that of the total study group. According to our results, a score of 1+ indicated less conclusive immunostaining for the HER-2/neu gene, and cases with scores of 1+ in the metastatic group had a higher rate of HER- 2/neu gene amplifi cation than that of the total study group. Our results show that FISH analysis for HER-2/neu gene status should be performed in cases with an immunostaining score of 1+, especially in those cases with positive axillary lymph node results.

___

  • 1. Prati R, Apple SK, He J, Gornbein JA, Chang HR. Histopathologic characteristics predicting HER-2/neu amplifi cation in breast cancer. Breast J 2005; 11: 433-9.
  • 2. Pothos A, Plastira K, Plastiras A, Vlachodimitropoulos D, Goutas N, Angelopoulou R. Comparison of chromogenic in situ hybridisation with fl uorescence in situ hybridisation and immunohistochemistry for the assessment of her-2/ neu oncogene in archival material of breast carcinoma. Acta Histochem Cytochem 2008; 41: 59-64.
  • 3. Slamon DJ, Godolphin W, Jones LA, Holt JA, Wong SG, Keith DE et al. Studies of the HER-2 neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian cancer. Science 1989; 244: 707-12.
  • 4. Ariga R, Zarif A, Korasick J, Reddy V, Siziopikou K, Gattuso P. Correlation of her-2/neu gene amplifi cation with other prognostic and predictive factors in female breast carcinoma. Breast J 2005; 11: 278-80.
  • 5. Hoff ER, Tubbs RR, Myles JL, Procop GW. Her2/neu amplifi cation in breast cancer. Stratifi cation by tumor type and grade. Am J Clin Pathol 2002; 117: 916-21.
  • 6. Ross JS, Fleisher JA. HER-2/neu (c-erb-B2) gene and protein in breast cancer. Am J Clin Pathol 1999; 112: 53-67.
  • 7. Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, Levin WJ, Ullrich A, McGuire WL. Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplifi cation of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science 1987; 235: 177-82.
  • 8. Slamon DJ. Biologic approaches to managing advanced breast cancer. Cancer Control 1999; 6: 7-11.
  • 9. Ross JS, Fletcher JA, Bloom KJ, Linette GP, Stec J, Symmans WF et al. Targeted therapy in breast cancer: the HER-2/neu gene and protein. Mol Cell Proteomics 2004; 3: 379-98.
  • 10. Kaptain S, Tan L, Chen B. Her-2/neu and breast cancer. Diagn Mol Pathol 2001; 10: 139-52.
  • 11. Ridolfi RL, Jamehdor MR, Arber JM. HER-2/neu testing in breast carcinoma: a combined immunohistochemical and fl uorescence in situ aproach. Mod Pathol 2000; 13: 866-73.
  • 12. Harłoziñska A, Bar JK, Wenderski R, Bebenek M. Relationship between c-erbB-2 oncoprotein, epidermal growth factor receptor, and estrogen receptor expression in patients with ductal breast carcinoma. Association with tumor phenotypes. In Vivo 1996; 10: 217-22.
  • 13. Cobleigh MA, Vogel CL, Tripathy D, Robert NJ, Scholl S, Fehrenbacher L et al. Multinational study of the effi cacy and safety of humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody in women who have HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer that has progressed aft er chemotherapy for metastatic disease. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 2639-2648.
  • 14. Slamon D, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, Paton V, Bajamonde A, Fleming T et al. Addition of Herceptin (humanized anti-HER2 antibody) to fi rst line chemotherapy for HER2 overexpressing metastatic breast cancer (HER2+/MBC) markedly increases anticancer activity: a randomized multinational controlled phase III trial. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1998; 17: 98a.
  • 15. Bartlett JM, Going JJ, Mallon EA, Watters AD, Reeves JR, Stanton P et al. Evaluating HER2 amplifi cation and overexpression in breast cancer. J Pathol 2001; 195: 422-28.
  • 16. Vogel CL, Franco SX. Clinical experience with trastuzumab (Herceptin). Breast J 2003; 9: 452-62.
  • 17. Onody P, Bertrand F, Muzeau F, Bièche I, Lidereau R. Fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemical assays for HER-2/neu status determination: application to node-negative breast cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2001; 125: 746-50.
  • 18. Jacobs TW, Gown AM, Yaziji H, Barnes MJ, Schnitt SJ. Comparison of fl uorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry for the evaluation of HER-2/neu in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999; 17: 1974-82.
  • 19. Hammock L, Lewis M, Phillips C, Cohen C. Strong HER-2/ neu protein overexpression by immunohistochemistry oft en does not predict oncogene amplifi cation by fl uorescence in situ hybridization. Hum Pathol 2003; 34: 1043-7.
  • 20. McCormick SR, Lillemoe TJ, Beneke J, Schrauth J, Reinartz J. HER2 assessment by immunohistochemical analysis and fl uorescence in situ hybridization: comparison of HercepTest and PathVysion commercial assays. Am J Clin Pathol 2002; 117: 935-43.
  • 21. Wang S, Saboorian MH, Frenkel EP, Haley BB, Siddiqui MT, Gokaslan S et al. Assessment of HER-2/neu status in breast cancer. Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS)-assisted quantitation of immunohistochemical assay achieves high accuracy in comparison with fl uorescence in situ hybridization assay as the standard. Am J Clin Pathol 2000; 116: 495-503.
  • 22. Lebeau A, Deimling D, Kaltz C, Sendelhofert A, Iff A, Luthardt B et al. HER-2/neu analysis in archival tissue samples of human breast cancer: Comparison of immunohistochemistry and fl uorescence in situ hybridization. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 354- 363.
  • 23. Tubbs RR, Pettay JD, Roche PC, Stoler MH, Jenkins RB, Grogan TM. Discrepancies in clinical laboratory testing of eligibility for trastuzumab therapy: Apparent immunohistochemical false-positives do not get the message. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 2714-21.
  • 24. Perez EA, Roche PC, Jenkins RB, Reynolds CA, Halling KC, Ingle JN et al. HER-2 testing in patients with breast cancer: Poor correlation between weak positivity by immunohistochemistry and gene amplifi cation by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Mayo Clin Proc 2002; 77: 148-54.
  • 25. Gong Y, Booser DJ, Sneige N. Comparison of HER-2 status determined by fl uorescence in situ hybridization in primary and metastatic breast carcinoma. Cancer 2005; 103: 1763-9.
  • 26. van de Vijver MJ. Assessment of the need and appropriate method for testing for the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2). Eur J Cancer 2001; 37: 11-7.
  • 27. Taucher S, Rudas M, Mader RM, Gnant M, Dubsky P, Bachleitner T et al. Do we need HER-2/neu testing for all patients with primary breast carcinoma? Cancer 2003; 98: 2547-53.
  • 28. Tsuda H, Hirohashi S, Shimosato Y, Hirota T, Tsugane S, Watanabe S et al. Correlation between histologic grade of malignancy and copy number of c-erbB-2 gene in breast carcinoma. Cancer 1990; 8: 1794-800.
  • 29. Sauer T, Wiedswang G, Boudjema G, Christensen H, Karesen R. Assessment of HER-2/neu overexpression and/or gene amplifi cation in breast carcinomas: should in situ hybridization be the method of choice? APMIS 2003; 111: 444-50.
  • 30. Lee A, Park WC, Yim HW, Lee MA, Park G, Lee KY. Expression of c-erbB2, cyclin D1 and estrogen receptor and their clinical implications in the invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2007; 37: 708-14.
  • 31. Bilous M, Ades C, Armes J, Bishop J, Brown R, Cooke B et al. Predicting the HER2 status of breast cancer from basic histopathology data: an analysis of 1500 breast cancers as part of the HER2000 international study. Breast 2003; 12: 92-8.
  • 32. Berger MS, Locher GW, Saurer S, Gullick WJ, Waterfi eld MD, Groner B et al. Correlation of c-erbB-2 gene amplifi cation and protein expression in human breast carcinoma with nodal status and nuclear grading. Cancer Res 1988; 48: 1238-43.
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0144
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Knowledge discovery for the treatment of bacteria affecting the liver

Pınar YILDIRIM, Kağan ÇEKEN, Osman SAKA

The need for antibiotic prophylaxis before urodynamic studies

Fuat KIZILAY, Rashad MAMMADOV, Mehmet Ceyhun ÖZYURT, Adnan ŞİMŞİR

Physician compliance with American Heart Association guidelines for prevention of bacterial endocarditis in dental procedures

Banu KOYUNCU ÖZVERİ, Servet KANDEMİR, Fatma Bahar SEZER, Tayfun GÜNBAY

Distribution of congenital heart disease in Turkey*

Serdar KULA, Ayhan ÇEVİK, Fatma Rana OLGUNTÜRK, Fatma Sedef TUNAOĞLU, Ayşe Deniz OĞUZ, Mustafa Necmi İLHAN

About cholecalciferol insufficiency

Nasih Şinasi ÖZSOYLU, Mahmut Nedim AYTEKİN

Ventricular functions, aortic elastic properties, and endothelial functions in patients with hypertensive response to treadmill exercise testing

Fethi KILIÇASLAN, Bekir Sıtkı CEBECİ, Ata KIRILMAZ, Oben BAYSAN, Mehmet YOKUŞOĞLU, Rifat Eralp ULUSOY

Cardiac complications of secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic hemodialysis patients

Alper AZAK, Ekrem ABAYLI, Mehmet Deniz AYLI, Hülya ÇİÇEKÇİOĞLU, Cüneyt YÜKSEL, Özgül UÇAR, İhsan ERGÜN

Clinical signifi cance and staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) characterization of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from blood cultures

Orhan BEDİR, Gürkan MERT, Ahmet Celal BAŞUSTAOĞLU, Abdullah KILIÇ

A comparison of intravenous general anesthesia and paracervical block for in vitro fertilization: effects on oocytes using the transvaginal technique

Ege Nazan GÖKER TAVMERGEN, Ayşin AKDOĞAN, Semra KARAMAN, Sevil BÜMEN, Vicdan FIRAT, İlkben GÜNÜŞEN

Distribution of congenital heart disease in Turkey

Serdar KULA, Ayhan ÇEVİK, Fatma Sedef TUNAOĞLU, Fatma Rana OLGUNTÜRK, Ayşe Deniz OĞUZ, Mustafa Necmi İLHAN