On ∗-commuting mappings and derivations in rings with involution

On ∗-commuting mappings and derivations in rings with involution

Let R be a ring with involution ∗. A mapping f : R → R is said to be ∗-commuting on R if [f(x), x∗ ] = 0 holds for all x ∈ R. The purpose of this paper is to describe the structure of a pair of additive mappings that are ∗- commuting on a semiprime ring with involution. Furthermore, we study the commutativity of prime rings with involution satisfying any one of the following conditions: (i) [d(x), d(x ∗ )] = 0, (ii) d(x) ◦ d(x ∗ ) = 0, (iii) d([x, x∗ ]) ± [x, x∗ ] = 0 (iv) d(x ◦ x ∗ ) ± (x ◦ x ∗ ) = 0, (v) d([x, x∗ ]) ± (x ◦ x ∗ ) = 0, (vi) d(x ◦ x ∗ ) ± [x, x∗ ] = 0, where d is a nonzero derivation of R. Finally, an example is given to demonstrate that the condition of the second kind of involution is not superfluous.

___

  • [1] Ali S, Dar NA. On ∗-centralizing mappings in rings with involution. Georgian Math J 2014; 1: 25-28.
  • [2] Ashraf M, Rehman N. On commutativity of rings with derivations. Results Math 2002; 42: 3-8.
  • [3] Beidar KI, Martindale WS 3rd, Mikhalev AV. Rings with Generalized Identities. New York, NY, USA: Marcel Dekker, 1996.
  • [4] Bell HE, Daif MN. On derivations and commutativity in prime rings. Acta Math Hungar 1995; 66: 337-343.
  • [5] Bell HE, Martindale WS 3rd. Centralizing mappings of semiprime rings. Canad Math Bull 1987; 30: 92-101.
  • [6] Bre˘sar M. Centralizing mappings and derivations in prime rings. J Algebra 1993; 156: 385-394.
  • [7] Bre˘sar M. On skew-commuting mappings of rings. Bull Austral Math Soc 1993; 47: 291-296.
  • [8] Bre˘sar M. On certain pairs of functions of semiprime rings. P Am Math Soc 1994; 120: 709-713.
  • [9] Daif MN. Commutativity results for semiprime rings with derivations. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences 1998; 21: 471-474.
  • [10] Daif MN, Bell HE. Remarks on derivations on semiprime rings. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences 1992; 15: 205-206.
  • [11] Divinsky N. On commuting automorphisms of rings. T Roy Soc Can 1955; 3: 19-22.
  • [12] Herstein IN. Rings with Involution. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press, 1976.
  • [13] Herstein IN. A note on derivations. Canad Math Bull 1978; 21: 369-370.
  • [14] Herstein IN. A note on derivations II. Canad Math Bull 1979; 22: 509-511.
  • [15] Herstein IN. A theorem on derivations of prime rings with involution. Canad Math Bull 1982; 34: 356-369.
  • [16] Posner EC. Derivations in prime rings. P Am Math Soc 1957; 8: 1093-1100.