Forage potential of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp).

Forage potential of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp).

Nine Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) genotypes were assessed for forage yield and quality features during 2005 and 2006 summer growing season at two locations (Samsun and Kavak) in Turkey. Experiments were established on May and arranged in a randomized complete block design with 3 replications in both years and locations. Although cowpea is not grown for forage purposes, their forage yield and quality are desirable in experiment conditions. Forage yield significantly (P

___

  • Adeyanju, A.O., M.F. Ishiyaku, L.O. Omoigui, 2007. Inhertance of time to first Flower in Photo-insensitive covpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.). Asian Journal of Plant Science. 6(2): 435-437.
  • Ahmad, U.H.A., R. Ahmad, N. Mahmood, A.Tanveer, 2007. Performance of forage sorghum intercropped with forage legumes under different planting patterns. Pak. J. Botany. 39(2): 431-439.
  • Ali, Y., Z. Aslam, F. Hussain, A. Shakur, 2004. Genotype and environmental interaction in cowpea (Vigna Unguiculata-L) for yield and disease resistance. Int. J. Environ. Sci. & Tech.1:119.
  • Basaran, U., I. Ayan, Z. Acar, H. Mut, O. Onal Asci, 2011. Seed yield and agronomic parameters of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) genotypes grown in the Black Sea region of Turkey. African J. Biotechnol. 10:13461.
  • Brink, M., G. Belay, 2006. Plant Resources of Tropical Africa, Cereals and Pulses. Backhuys Publishers, CTA Wageningen, Netherlands. 1:298.
  • Dahmardeh, M., A. Ghanbari, B. Sayasar, M. Ramroudi, 2009. Effect of intercropping maize (Zea mays L.) with cow pea (Vigna unguiculata L.) on Green forage yield and quality evaluation. Asian Journal of Plant Science. 8(3): 235-239.
  • Gulumser, A., F. Tosun, H. Bozoglu, 1989. A study on the production of cowpea under the ecological conditions of samsun. OMU J. Fac. Agric. 4:49.
  • Gwanzura, T., J.W. Ngambi, D. Norris, 2011. Effects of selected legumes species and forage sorghum hay grown in Limpopo Province on voluntary intake and relative platability indices of pedi goats. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 6(12): 1249-1255
  • Karungi, J., E. Adipala, M.W. Ogenga-Latigo, S. Kyamanywa, N. Oyobo, L.E.N. Jackai, 2000. Pest management in cowpea. Part 2. Integrating planting time, plant density and insect application for management of cowpea field insect pests in eastern Uganda. Crop Protection 19: 237-245
  • Khan, A., A. Bari, S. Khan, N.S. Hussain, I. Zada, 2010. Performance of cowpea genotypes at higher altitude of NWFP. Pak. J. Bot. 42:2291.
  • Kiesling, D.O., H. A. Swartz, 1997. Growth and carcass characteristics of lambs grazing cowpea, sudangrass or fed in drylot. Small Rum. Res. 26:171.
  • Mortimore, M.J., B.B. Singh, F. Harris, S.F. Blade, 1997. Cowpea in traditional cropping systems. In: Singh BB, Mohan Raj DR, Dashiell KE, Jackai LEN (eds) Advances in cowpea research. IITA/JIRCAS, IITA, Ibadan Nigeria pp 99–113.
  • Ntare, B.R., J.H. Williams, 1993. Selection of cowpea cultivars for cool-season production in the Sahel. Field Crops Res. 32: 27.
  • NRC (National Research Council), 1996. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle (7th Ed.) National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
  • Peksen, A., 2004. Fresh pod yield and some pod characteristics of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) genotypes from Turkey. Asia J. Plant Sci. 3, 269-273.
  • Peksen, E., 2007. Yield performance of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) cutivars under rainfed and irrigated condutions. International Journal of Agricultural Research. 2(4): 391-396.
  • Peksen, E., C. Artik, 2004. Comparison of some cowpea (Vigna ungiuculata (L). Walp) gonotypes from Turkey for seed yield and yield related characters. J. Agron. 3:137.
  • Peksen, A., E. Peksen, H. Bozoglu, 2002. Effects of sowing dates on yield and quality of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) genotypes grown in a greenhouse. Acta Hort. 579:351.
  • Rohweder, D.A., R.F. Barnes, N. Jorgenson, 1978. Proposed hay grading standards based on laboratory analyses for evaluating quality. J. Anim. Sci. 47:747.
  • Singh, B.B., H.A. Ajeigbe, S.A. Tarawali, S. Fernandez-Rivera, M. Abubakar, 2003. Improving the production and utilization of cowpea as food and fodder. Field Crops Res. 84:169.
  • SPSS Inc., 1999. SPSS for Windows. Release, 10.0 copyright SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA
  • Tejada, R., L.R. McDowell, F.G. Martin, J.H. Conrad, 1985. Mineral element analyses of various tropical forages in Guatemala and their relationship to soil concentrations. Nutrition Reports International, 32: 313.
  • Tarawali, S.A., B.B. Singh, S.C. Gupta, R. Tabo, F. Harris, S. Nokoe, S. Ferna´ndez-Rivera, A. Bationo, V.M. Manyong, K. Makinde, E.C. Odion, 2002. Cowpea as a key factor for a new approach to integrated crop–livestock systems research in the dry savannas of West Africa. In: Fatokun CA,
  • Tarawali S, Singh BB, Kormawa PM, Tamo M (eds) Challenges and opportunities forenhancing sustainable cowpea production. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria, pp 233–251
  • Tekeli, A.S., E. Ates, 2005. Yield potential and mineral composition of white clover (Trifolium repens l.)-tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea schreb.) mixtures. J. Cent. Eur. Agric. 6:27.
  • TUIK, 2011. Turkish Statistical Institute, Agriculture statistics, Crop production statics. (Available at: Turkey. http://tuikapp.tuik.gov.tr/bitkiselapp/bitkisel_ing.zul.)
  • Vural, K., A. Karasu, 2007. Agronomical characteristics of some cowpea ecotypes (Vıgna unguılata L.) grown in Turkey; vegetation time, seed and pod characteristics. Not. Bot. Hort. Agrobot. Cluj. 35:43.