Determination of genetic variation and relationship in Turkish barley cultivars by hordein and RAPD markers

Determination of genetic variation and relationship in Turkish barley cultivars by hordein and RAPD markers

Genetic variation and relationships among thirty four barley cultivars (H. vulgare L.) improved in Turkey were assessed by hordeins and RAPDs. Totally, 15 different hordein patterns were observed among 34 cultivars and twelve of these were cultivar specific. In comparison to hordeins, the RAPD variation observed among cultivars was higher and 80 % of these scorable bands were polymorphic. Genetic similarity (GS) calculated on hordein and RAPD data ranged from 0.52 to 1.00 and 0.57 to 1.00, respectively. Cluster analyses based on hordein data showed that most of the cultivars are closely related in genetical point of view. The dendrogram of hordeins were completely different from those of RAPDs and they couldn’t precisely separate the barley cultivars. In addition to these, the level of polymorphism detected with hordein was lower than that of with RAPDs. Correspondence analysis by using two marker systems showed that RAPD data could distinguish almost all barley cultivars except Tokak 157/37 and Bülbül89, whereas hordein data were not able to perform to distinguish barley cultivars like RAPDs. Some polymorphic and repeatable RAPDs markers should be equipped with morphologic markers in order to identify candidate cultivars and registered cultivars before and after registration procedure.

___

  • Anderson, J. A., Ogihara, Y., Sorrells, M.E., Tanksley, S. D. 1992. Development of a chromosomal arm map for wheat based on RFLP markers. Theor Appl Genet. 83:1035-1043.
  • Autran, J. C. and Scriban, R. 1977. European Brewing Convention. 16:47-62.
  • Becker, J., Vos, P., Kuiper, M., Salamini, F., Heun, M. 1995. Combined mapping of AFLP and RFLP markers in barley. Mol Gen Genet. 249: 65-73.
  • Bernardo, A., Luque, A., Cuardrado, A., Negro, A., Jouve, N., Soler, C. 1997. The assessment of genetic variation in Spanish primitive cultivars of barley, Hordeum vulgare L., by a combination of isozymes and hordeins. Genet Resour Crop Ev. 44:217-226.
  • Botstein, D., White, R.L., Skolnick, V., Davis, V. 1980. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet. 32:314- 331.
  • Cooke, R. J. 1995a. Distribution and diversity of hordein alleles in barley varieties. Seed Sci Technol. 23: 865-871.
  • Cooke, R. J. 1995b. Gel electrophoresis for the identification of plant varieties. J. Chromatogr. 698; 281-299.
  • Cooke, R. J., Cliff, E. N. and Draper, S. R. 1983. Barley cultivar characterization by electrophoresis II. Classification of hordein electrophoregrams. J Natl Inst Agr Bot. 16 (2):197-206.
  • Cooper, S. R. 1987. Report of the rules committee. Seed Sci Technol. 15:555-575.
  • Gebre, H., Khan, K. and Foster, A. E. 1986. Barley cultivars identification by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of hordein proteins: Catalog of cultivars. Crop Sci. 26:454-460.
  • Graner, A., Jahoor, A., Schondelmair, J., Siedler, H., Pillen, K., Fischbeck, G. 1991. Construction of an RFLP map of barley. Theor Appl Genet. 83:250-256.
  • Hoffman, D.L., Bregitzer, P. 1996. Identification of reproducible PCR-RAPD markers that enable the identification of closely related six-rowed malting barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars. J Am Soc Brew Chem. 54:172-176.
  • Kapala, A. 1981. Variability of electrophoretic subunit patterns of hordein proteins in spring barley (Hordem vulgare L.). Genet Pol. 22:163.
  • Marchylo, B. A. and Laberge, D. E. 1980. Barley cultivars identification by electrophoresis analysis of hordein proteins. Can J Plant Sci. 60:1343-1350.
  • Marchylo, B. A. and Laberge, D. E. 1981. Barley cultivar identification by electrophoretic analysis of hordein proteins II. Catalogue of electrophoregram formulae for Canadian grown barley cultivars. Can J Plant Sci. 61(4):859-870.
  • Marchylo, B. A. 1987. Barley cultivars identification by SDS gradient PAGE analysis of hordein. Can. J. Plant Sci. 67; 927- 944.
  • Marillia, E. F. and Scoles, G. J. 1996. The use of RAPD markers in Hordeum phylogeny. Genome. 39:646-654.
  • Montembault, A., Autran, J. C. and Joudrier, P. 1983. Varietal identification of barley and malt. J Inst Brew. 89:299-302.
  • Nei, M. and Li, W. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction/endonuc1eases. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 76:5269-5273.
  • Ordon, F.; Schiemann, A., Friedt, W. 1997. Assessment of the genetic relatedness of barley accessions (Hordeum vulgare s.l.) resistant to soil-borne mosaic-inducing viruses (BaMMV, BaYMV, BaYMV-2) using RAPDs. Theor Appl Genet. 94:325-330.
  • Perovic, D., Yan, Y., Prodanovic, S., Vracarevic, M. and Zoric, D. 1998. Characterization of spring barley cultivars by hordein seed storage protein analysis. Rachis. 17(1&2):6-9.
  • Rohlf, F.J. 1993. NTSYS-pc version 1.80. Distribution by Exeter Software, Setauket, NewYork.
  • Saghai-Maroof, M. A., Biyashev, R. M., Yang, G. P., Zhang, Q., Allard, R. W. 1994. Extraordinarily polymorphic microsatellite DNA in barley: species diversity, chromosomal locations, and population dynamics. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 91:5466-5470.
  • Shewry, P. R., Ellis, J. R. S., Pratt, H. M. and Miflin, B. 1978. Varietal identification of single seed of barley by analysis of hordein polypeptides. J Sci Food Agr. 29:587-596.
  • Smith, D. B. and Payne, P. J. 1984. A procedure for the routine determination of electrophoresis band pattern of barley and malt endosperm proteins. Journal of National Institute Agriculture Botany. 16:487-498.
  • Sneath, P. H. A. and Sokal, R. R. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. Freeman, San Francisco. 573p.
  • Weiss, W., Postel, W. and Görg, A. 1991. Barley cultivars discrimination: I. Sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and isoelectric focusing with immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis. 12:330-337.
  • White, J. and Cooke, R. J. 1992. A standard classification system for the identification of barley varieties by electrophoresis. Seed Sci Technol. 20:663-676.