Dariusz GOZDOWSKI, Wies?aw M?DRY, Jakub PADEREWSKI, Jan ROZBICKI, Mariusz PIECHOCI?SKI, Marcin STUDNICKI, Adriana DEREJKO, Jan GOLBA

ADAPTATION OF WINTER WHEAT CULTIVARS TO CROP MANAGEMENTS AND POLISH AGRICULTURAL ENVIRONMENTS

Limited knowledge exists on complementary methodology for effective studying cultivar adaptive responses in two-factorial multi-environment trials planned in split-block design. The main objective of this paper, as the first - mostly methodological - part of the further studies, was to present and empirically illustrate the using, and to assess the usefulness of statistical methods for studying the adaptive yield response of winter wheat cultivars to agricultural environments and to two crop management intensities, on the basis of data from oneyear multi-environment two-factorial trials arranged in a split-block design. The statistical methodology consists of the combined three-way analysis of variance according to the fixed-effects model for the cultivar × management x location (GxMxL) grain yield data from this series of trials, the AMMI analysis of the cultivar × location (G×L) interaction and the cluster analysis for the AMMI-modeled means of the cultivars at the test locations calculated across two crop management intensities. The suggested methodology was an effective tool for identifying various patterns of cultivar response to environments and to the intensity of crop managements. It permits effective identifying cultivars exhibiting wide or narrow adaptation. Wide adaptation exhibited by the Polish cultivar Bogatka and the German cultivar Jenga, losing in only very few environments the top two positions for yield to other groups of cultivars with specific adaptation or generally not adapted

PDF

___

Akcura M., Y. Kaya, S. Taner, 2009. Evaluation of durum wheat genotypes using parametric and nonparametric stability statistics. Turk. J. Field Crops 14(2): 111– 122.
Anderson W.K., 2010. Closing the gap between actual and potential yield of rain-fed wheat. The impacts of environment, management and cultivar. Field Crops Res. 116:14–22
Annicchiarico P., 2002. Genotype x environment interactions - Challenges and opportunities for plant breeding and cultivar recommendations, FAO Plant Productions and Protection Paper No 174, FAO, Rome, 115pp
Annicchiarico P., F. Bellah, T. Chiari, 2006. Repeatable genotype×location interaction and its exploitation by conventional and GIS-based cultivar recommendation for durum wheat in Algeria. Eur .J. Agron. 24:70–81
Annicchiarico P., E. Chiapparino, M. Perenzin, 2010. Response of common wheat varieties to organic and conventional production systems across Italian locations, and implications for selection. Field Crops Res. 116:230-238
Annicchiarico P., L. Pecetti, A. Abdelguerfi, A. Bouizgaren, A.M. Carroni, T. Hayek, M. M’Hammadi Bouzina, M. Mezni, 2011a. Adaptation of landrace and variety germplasm and selection strategies for lucerne in the Mediterranean basin. Field Crops Res. 120:283-291
Annicchiarico P., L. Pecetti, H. Bouzerzour, R. Kallida, A. Khedim, C. Porqueddu, N.M. Simões, F. Volaire, F. Lelièvre, 2011b. Adaptation of contrasting cocksfoot plant types to agricultural environments across the Mediterranean basin. Environ. Exp. Bot. 74:82– 89
Ayoub M., S. Guertin, J. Fregeau-Reid, D.L. Smith, 1994. Nitrogen fertilizer effect on breadmaking quality of hard red spring wheat in eastern Canada. Crop Sc. 34:1346-1352
Basford K.E., Cooper M. 1998. Genotype x environment interactions and some considerations of their implications for wheat breeding in Australia. Austr. J. Agric. Res. 49:153- 174
Bradu D., K.R. Gabriel, 1978. The biplot as a diagnostic tool for model of two-way tables. Technometrics 1978 47–63
Carr P.M., R.D. Horsley, W.W. Poland, 2003. Tillage and seeding rate effects on wheat cultivars: I. grain production. Crop Sci. 43:202–209.
COBORU, 2002. Cereals. Methodology of cultivar testing. COBORU, Słupia Wielka (In Polish)
Cooper M., D.R. Woodruff, I.G. Phillips, K.E. Basford, A.R. Gilmour, 2001. Genotype-by-management interactions for grain yield and grain protein concentration of wheat. Field Crops Res. 69:47-67
Cornelius P.L., J. Crossa, M. Seyedsadr, 1996 Statistical tests and estimators of multiplicative models for genotype-byenvironment interaction. In: Kang M.S., H.G. Gauch (Eds.), Genotype by Environment Interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 199-234
Crossa J., P.N. Fox, W.H. Pfeiffer, S. Rajaram, H.G. Gauch 1991. AMMI adjustment for statistical analysis of an international wheat yield trial. Theor. Appl. Genet. 81:27–37
Denčić S., N. Mladenov, B. Kobiljski, 2011. Effects of genotype and environment on breadmaking quality in wheat. Int. J. Plant Prod. 5:71-82
Dias C., W. Krzanowski, 2003. Model selection and cross validation in additive main effect and multiplicative interaction models. Crop Sci. 43:865-873
Drzazga T., J. Paderewski, W. Mądry, P. Kajewski, 2009. The winter wheat yield response to environments in postregistration trials. Biuletyn IHAR 253:71-82 (In Polish)
Fan X.M., M.S. Kang, H. Chen, Y. Zhang, J. Tan, C. Xu, 2007. Yield stability of maize hybrids evaluated in multienvironment trials in Yunnan, China. Agron. J. 99:220-228
Gauch H.G. 1988. Model selection and validation for yield trials with interaction. Biometrics 44:705-715
Gauch H.G. 1992. Statistical analysis of regional yield trials. AMMI analysis of factorial designs. Elsevier Science, New York, NY.
Gauch H.G., H.P. Piepho, P. Annicchiarico, 2008. Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE: Further considerations. Crop Sci. 48:866–889
Gauch H.G., R.W. Zobel, 1997. Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes. Crop Sci. 37:311-326
Geleta B., M. Atak, P.S. Baenziger, L.A. Nelson, D.D.
Baltenesperger, K.M. Eskridge, M.J. Shipman, D.R. Shelton 2002. Seeding rate and genotype effect on agronomic performance and end-use quality of winter wheat. Crop Sci. 42:827–832
Gomez K.A., A.A. Gomez, 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Toronto, Canada
Ilker E., H. Geren, R. Unsal, I. Sevim, F. Aykut Tonk, M. Tosun, 2011. AMMI-biplot analysis of yield performances of bread wheat cultivars grown at different locations. Turk. J. Field Crops, 16(1): 64-68
Ma B.L., W. Yan, L.M. Dwyer, J. Fregeau-Reid, H.D. Voldeng, Y. Dion, H. Nass, 2004. Graphic analysis of genotype, environment, nitrogen fertilizer, and their interactions on spring wheat yield. Agron. J. 96:169–180
Mądry W., E.S. Gacek, J. Paderewski, D. Gozdowski, T. Drzazga 2011. Adaptive yield response of winter wheat cultivars across environments in Poland using combined AMMI and cluster analyses. Int. J. Plant Prod. 5:299-310
McIntosh M.S. 1983. Analysis of combined experiments. Crop Sci. 75:153-156.
Mejza I. 1998. Characterization of certain split-block designs with a control. Biometrical J. 40:627–639
Mejza I. 1999. Planning of multi-environment two-factorial trials planned in a split-plot design and data analysis. Roczniki Akademii Rolniczej w Poznaniu, vol 301 (In Polish)
Mintenko A.S., S.R. Smith, D.J. Cattani 2002. Turfgrass evaluation of native grasses for the Northern Great Plains Region. Crop Sci. 42:2018–2024
Oscarsson M., R. Anderrsson, P. Aman, A. Jonsson 1998. Effects of cultivar, nitrogen fertilization rate and environment on yield and grain quality of barley. J. Sci. Food Agric. 78: 359-366
Paderewski J, H.G. Gauch, W. Mądry, Drzazga T., Rodrigues P.C. 2011. Yield response of winter wheat to agro-ecological conditions using additive main effects and multiplicative interaction and cluster analysis. Crop Sci. 51:969–980
Pena R.J. 2007. Current and future trends of wheat quality needs. In: Buck H. T., Nisi J. E., Salomon N. (Eds.). Wheat production in stressed environments. Springer, pp: 411-424
Piepho H.P. 1995. Robustness of statistical tests for multiplicative terms in the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model for cultivar trials. Theor. Appl. Genet. 90:438-443
R Development Core Team. 2009. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Available at http://www.Rproject.org (verified 3 Dec. 2010). R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria SAS Institute. 2004. SAS system for Windows. v. 8.2. SAS Inst., Cary, NC
Schmidt J.P., J.A. Lamb, M.A. Schmitt, G.W. Randall, J.H. Orf, H.T. Gollany, 2001. Soybean varietal response to liquid swine manure application. Agron. J. 93:358–363Sharma R.C., A.I. Morgounov, H.J. Braun, B. Akin, M. Keser, D. Bedoshvili, A. Bagci, C. Martius, M. van Ginkel, 2009.
Identifying high yielding stable winter wheat genotypes for irrigated environments in Central and West Asia. Euphytica 171,53-64
Sivapalan S., L. O’Brien, G. Ortiz-Ferrera, G.J. Hollamby, I. Barclay, P.J. Martin, 2000. An adaptation analysis of Australian and CIMMYT/ICARDA wheat germplasm in Australian production environments. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 51: 903-915
Souza E.J., J.M. Martin, M.J. Guttieri, K.M. O'Brien, D.K. Habernicht, S.P. Lanning, R. McLean, G.R. Carlson, L.E.
Talbert, 2004. Influence of genotype, environment, and nitrogen management on spring wheat quality. Crop Sci. 44:425-432
Yan W., M.S. Kang, 2003. GGE Biplot Analysis: A Graphical Tool for Breeders, Geneticists, and Agronomists. CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL
Zhang Y., Z. He, A. Zhang, M. van Ginkel, G. Ye, 2006. Pattern analysis on grain yield of Chinese and CIMMYT spring wheat cultivars grown in China and CIMMYT. Euphytica 147:409-420