MOPSO-based predictive control strategy for efficient operation of sensorless vector-controlled fuel cell electric vehicle induction motor drives

MOPSO-based predictive control strategy for efficient operation of sensorless vector-controlled fuel cell electric vehicle induction motor drives

This paper introduces an optimal control strategy of model-based predictive control (MPC) based on multiobjective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) for a sensorless vector control induction motor, which is used in a fuel cell electric vehicle drive system. The proposed MPC-MOPSO algorithm is implemented to tune the weighting parameters of the MPC controller to tackle all the conflicting objective functions. The paper handles the following fitness functions: minimizing the speed error, minimizing the torque ripple, minimizing the DC-link voltage ripple, and minimizing machine flux ripple. Computer simulations studies have been completed utilizing MATLAB/Simulink with a specific end goal of assessing the dynamic performance of the proposed MPC-MOPSO optimal controller and comparing it with single-objective particle swarm optimization and traditional PI controllers. The simulation results demonstrate the good dynamic response of the proposed MPC-MOPSO optimal tuning strategy over the traditional PI controllers for more accurate tracking performance through the whole speed range, especially at starting conditions and load change disturbances.

___

  • [1] Abdallah T, Mamadou BC, Brayima D, Yacine A. DC/DC and DC/AC converters control for hybrid electric vehicles energy management: ultracapacitors and fuel cell. IEEE T Ind Inform 2013; 9: 686-696.
  • [2] Thounthong P, Pierfederici S, Martin JP, Hinaje M, Davat B. Modeling and control of fuel cell/supercapacitor hybrid source based on differential flatness control. IEEE T Veh Technol 2010; 59: 2700-2710.
  • [3] Camara MB, Dakyo B, Gualous H. Supercapacitors and battery energy management based on new European driving cycle. Journal of Energy and Power Engineering 2012; 6: 168-177.
  • [4] Ahmed ZD, Vladimir P. Vector controlled induction motor drive based on model predictive control. In: 11th International Conference on Actual Problems of Electronics Instrument Engineering; 2–4 October 2012; Novosibirsk, Russia. pp. 167-173.
  • [5] Jose T, Jayendra T, Kamalesh H, Krishna V. An improved scheme for extended power loss ride-through in a voltagesource-inverter-fed vector-controlled induction motor drive using a loss minimization technique. IEEE T Ind Appl 2016; 52: 1500-1508.
  • [6] Jaroslaw G, Haitham A. Speed sensorless induction motor drive with predictive current controller. IEEE T Ind Electron 2013; 60: 699-709.
  • [7] Andrew S, Shady G, John F. Improved rotor flux estimation at low speeds for torque MRAS-based sensorless induction motor drives. IEEE T Energy Conver 2016; 31: 270-282.
  • [8] Yaman Z, Shady G, David A. Model predictive MRAS estimator for sensorless induction motor drives. IEEE T Ind Electron 2016; 63: 3511-3521.
  • [9] Xiaodong S, Long C, Zebin Y, Huangqiu Z. speed-sensorless vector control of a bearingless induction motor with artificial neural network inverse speed observer. IEEE-ASME T Mech 2013; 18: 1357-1366.
  • [10] Francesco A, Tommaso C, Filippo D, Adriano F, Antonino S. Convergence analysis of extended Kalman filter for sensorless control on induction motor. IEEE T Ind Electron 2015; 62: 2341-2352.
  • [11] Habibullah MD, Dylan DL. A speed-sensorless FS-PTC of induction motors using extended Kalman filters. IEEE T Ind Electron 2015; 62: 6765-6778.
  • [12] Mousavi-Aghdam SR, Sharifian MBB. Nonlinear adaptive observer for sensorless control of induction motor. In: 20th Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering; 2012: Tehran, Iran. pp. 376-379.
  • [13] Yung-Chang L, Chen-Lung T, Wen-Cheng P, Cheng-Tao T. Full-order stator flux observer based sensorless vector controlled induction motor drives applying particle swarm optimization algorithm. In: International Symposium on Computer, Consumer and Control; 4–6 July 2016; Xi’an, China. pp. 899-902.
  • [14] Patel C, Ramchand R, Sivakumar K, Das A, Gopakumar K. A rotor flux estimation during zero and active vector periods using current error space vector from a hysteresis controller for a sensorless vector control of IM drive. IEEE T Ind Electron 2011; 58: 2334-2344.
  • [15] Lascu C, Boldea I, Blaabjerg F. A class of speed-sensorless sliding mode observers for high-performance induction motor drives. IEEE T Ind Electron 2009; 56: 3394-3403.
  • [16] Zaky MS. Stability analysis of speed and stator resistance estimators for sensorless induction motor drives. IEEE T Ind Electron 2012; 59: 858-870.
  • [17] Boglietti A, Cavagnino A, Lazzari M. Computational algorithms for induction-motor equivalent circuit parameter determination—Part I: Resistances and leakage reactances. IEEE T Ind Electron 2011; 58: 3723-3733.
  • [18] Ko J, Choi J, Chung D. Hybrid artificial intelligent control for speed control of induction motor. In: International Joint Conference SICE-ICASE; 18–21 October 2006; Busan, South Korea. pp. 678-683.
  • [19] Ji ZC, Shen YX. Back-stepping position control for induction motor based on neural network. In: 1st IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications; 24–26 May 2006; Singapore. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1-5.
  • [20] Lin FJ, Shieh HJ, Shyu KK, Huang PK. On-line gain tuning IP controller using real coded genetic algorithm. Electr Pow Syst Res 2004; 72: 157-169.
  • [21] Khalil M, Ahmed E, Mohamed R. Model predictive control using FPGA. International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling 2015; 5: 1-14.
  • [22] Sivakumar R, Shennes M. Design and development of model predictive controller for binary distillation column. International Journal of Science and Research 2014; 5: 445-451.
  • [23] Holkar K, Waghmare L. An overview of model predictive control. International Journal of Control and Automation 2010; 3: 47-63.
  • [24] Thomsen S, Hoffmann N, Fuchs F. PI control, PI-Based state space control and model-based predictive control for drive systems with elastically coupled loads-a comparative study. IEEE T Ind Electron 2011; 58: 3647-3657.
  • [25] Mapok K, Zuva T, Masebu H, Zuva K. Performance comparison of two controllers on a nonlinear system. International Journal of Chaos, Control, Modelling and Simulation 2013; 2: 17-30.
  • [26] Bayoumi EHE, Awadallah MA, Soliman HM. Deadbeat performance of vector-controlled induction motor drives using particle swarm optimization and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems. Electro-motion Scientific Journal 2011; 18: 231-242.
  • [27] Ryohei S, Fukiko K, Hideyuki I, Chikashi N, Yoshikazu F, Eitaro A. Automatic tuning of model predictive control using particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium; 2007. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 221-226.
  • [28] Sofiane B, Mohammed C, Fouad A, Salim F. A new approach for fuzzy predictive adaptive controller design using particle swarm optimization algorithm. Int J Innov Comput I 2013; 9: 3741-3758.
  • [29] Ngatchou P, Zarei A, El-Sharkawi A. Pareto multi objective optimization. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Application to Power Systems; 6–10 November 2005. pp. 84 -91.
  • [30] Berizzi A, Innorta M, Marannino P. Multiobjective optimization techniques applied to modern power systems. In: IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting; 2001. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1503-1508.
  • [31] Coello CA, Lechuga MS. MOPSO: A proposal for multiple objective particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2002. Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Part of the 2002 IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence; May 2002. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1051-1056.
  • [32] Jihane K, Mohamed C. Optimization of hybrid renewable energy power systems using evolutionary algorithms. In: 5th International Conference on Systems and Control; 25–27 May 2016; Marrakesh, Morocco. pp. 383-388.
  • [33] Fawzan S, Mohamed A. Model predictive control for deadbeat performance of induction motor drives. WSEAS Transactions on Circuits and Systems 2015; 14: 304-312.
  • [34] Finn H. Comparing PI tuning methods in a real benchmark temperature control system. Norwegian Society of Automatic Control, Modeling, Identification and Control 2010; 31: 79-91.
Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0632
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Energy and area spectral efficiency trade-off for MC-CDMA with carrier frequency offset

Junaid AHMED, Sarmad SOHAIB, Moazzam Islam TIWANA, Omar AHMAD

Late fusion of facial dynamics for automatic expression recognition

Alessandra BANDRABUR, Laura FLOREA, Cornel FLOREA, Matei MANCAS

Assessment of disordered voices based on an optimized glottal source model

Abdellah KACHA, Mounir BOUDJERDA

Evaluation of distance education websites: a hybrid multicriteria approach

Mehmet KABAK, Metin DAĞDEVİREN, Eren ÖZCEYLAN, Tolga GENÇ

An experimental study of indoor RSS-based RF fingerprinting localization using GSM and Wi-Fi signals

Hasari ÇELEBİ, Engin ZEYDAN, Hakan Paşa PARTAL, İlyas Alper KARATEPE, Ahmet Salih ER, Gökhan ÇELİK

Extraction of geometric and prosodic features from human-gait-speech data for behavioral pattern detection: Part I

Raj Kumar PATRA, Tilendra Shishir SINHA, Ravi Prakash DUBEY

A new segmentation method of cerebral MRI images based on the fuzzy c-means algorithm

Mohamed Zaki ABDERREZAK, Mouatez Billah CHIBANE, Karim MANSOUR

Constrained control allocation for nonlinear systems with actuator failures or faults

Saman BOUKANI EBRAHIMI, Roya AMJADIFARD, Mohammad Javad KHOSROWJERDI

A fast feature selection approach based on extreme learning machine and coefficient of variation

Ömer Faruk ERTÜĞRUL, Mehmet Emin TAĞLUK

A bidirectional wireless power transfer system for an electric vehicle with a relay circuit

Xiaojie WU, Wei WANG, Chenyang XIA, Yanhe WANG, Kezhang LIN, Yuling LIU