Electrostatic discharge currents and their derivatives’ approximation by piecewise power-exponential functions

Electrostatic discharge currents and their derivatives’ approximation by piecewise power-exponential functions

An analytically extended function based on power-exponential functions is used in this paper for approximation of electrostatic discharge (ESD) currents and their derivatives. The Marquardt least-squares method (MLSM) isapplied for obtaining nonlinear function parameters. IEC 61000-4-2 Standard ESD current is approximated, as well assome measured ESD currents’ wave shapes. Power-exponential terms are extended at the local maxima and minima ofthe represented wave shape, so that this approximation is done from peak to peak. ESD current derivative is approximated using the same procedure in order to obtain the continuous second order derivative of the current, as all piecewisefunctions are of differentiability class $C^1$. Currents and their derivatives are often measured in ESD experiments so thattheir analytical representation is needed for simulation of ESD phenomena, better definition of standard requirements,and computation of the transient fields and induced effects.

___

  • [1] Bruce CER, Golde RH. The lightning discharge. J Inst Electr Eng 1941; 88: 487-520.
  • [2] Golde RH. Lightning currents and related parameters. In: Lightning vol 1, Physics of Lightning, London, UK: Academic Press, 1977, pp. 309-350.
  • [3] Heidler F. Travelling current source model for LEMP calculation. In: 6th Int. Zurich Symp. EMC Proc. 1985; pp. 157-162.
  • [4] IEC 62305-1 standard, Protection against lightning – Part 1: General principles, Ed.2.0, 2010-12.
  • [5] IEC 61000-4-2 standard, EMC – Part 4-2: Testing and Measurement Techniques – Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test, Ed.2.0, 2008-2012.
  • [6] Heidler F, Cvetic J. A class of analytical functions to study the lightning effects associated with the current front. Eur T Electr Power 2002; 12: 141-150.
  • [7] Diendorfer G, Uman MA. An improved return stroke model with specified channel-base current. J Geophys Res 1990; 95: 13621-13644.
  • [8] Nucci CA, Diendorfer G, Uman MA, Rachidi F, Ianoz M, Mazzetti C. Lightning return stroke current models with specified channel-base current: a review and comparison. J Geophys Res 1990; 95(D12): 20395-20408.
  • 9] Rakov VA, Uman MA. Review and evaluation of lightning return stroke models including some aspects of their application. IEEE T Electromagn C 1998; 40: 403-426.
  • [10] Feizhou Z, Shange L. A new function to represent the lightning return-stroke currents. IEEE T Electromagn C 2002; 44: 595-597.
  • [11] Javor V. Multi-peaked functions for representation of lightning channel-base currents. In: ICLP 2012 31st International Conference on Lightning Protection; Vienna, Austria. doi:10.1109/ICLP.2012.6344384.
  • [12] De Conti A, Visacro S. Analytical representation of single- and double-peaked lightning current waveforms. IEEE T Electromagn C 2007; 49: 448-451.
  • [13] Javor V. Approximation of a double-peaked lightning channel-base current. COMPEL 2012; 31: 1007-1017.
  • [14] Marquardt DM. An algorithm for least-squares estimation of non-linear parameters. J Soc Ind Appl Math 1963; 11: 431-441.
  • [15] Lovri´c D, Vujevi´c S, Modri´c T. On the estimation of Heidler function parameters for reproduction of various standardized and recorded lightning current waveshapes. Int T Electr Energy 2013; 23: 290-300.
  • [16] Lundeng¨ard K, Ranˇci´c M, Javor V, Silvestrov S. Estimation of parameters for the multi-peaked AEF current functions. Springer Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability 2016; doi: 10.1007/s11009-016-9501-z, pp. 1-15.
  • [17] Javor V. New function for representing IEC 61000-4-2 Standard electrostatic discharge current. Facta Universitatis Series Electronics & Energetics 2014; 27: 509-522.
  • [18] Keenan RK, Rosi LKA. Some fundamental aspects of ESD testing. In: IEEE Int. Symp. on Electromagn. Compatibility 1991; New Jersey, USA: IEEE. pp. 236-241.
  • [19] Berghe SV, Zutter D. Study of ESD signal entry through coaxial cable shields. J Electrostat 1998; 44: 135-148.
  • [20] Songlin S, Zengjun B, Minghong T, Shange L. A new analytical expression of current waveform in Standard 61000- 4-2. High Power Laser & Particle Beams 2003; 15: 464-466.
  • [21] Yuan Z, Li T, He J, Chen S, Zeng R. New mathematical descriptions of ESD current waveform based on the polynomial of pulse function. IEEE T Electromagn C 2006; 48: 589-591.
  • [22] Wang K, Pommerenke D, Chundru R, Van Doren T, Drewniak JL, Shashindranath A. Numerical modeling of electrostatic discharge generators. IEEE T Electromagn C 2003; 45: 258-270.
  • [23] Fotis GP, Ganos IF, Stathopulos IA. Determination of discharge current equation parameters of ESD using genetic algorithms. Electron Lett 2006; 42: 797-799.
  • [24] Wang K, Wang J, Wang X. Four order electrostatic discharge circuit model and its simulation. Telkomnika 2012; 10: 2006-2012.
  • [25] Katsivelis PS, Gonos IF, Stathopulos IA. Estimation of parameters for the electrostatic discharge current equation with real human discharge events reference using genetic algorithms. Meas Sci Technol 2010; 21 (105703): 1-6.
  • [26] Pommerenke D, Aidam M. ESD: Waveform calculation, field and current of human and simulator ESD. J Electrostat 1996; 38: 33-51.
  • [27] Wright N. New ESD standard and influence on test equipment requirements. Turk J Elec Eng & Comp Sci 2009; 17: 337-344.