An algorithm for image restoration with mixed noise using total variation regularization

An algorithm for image restoration with mixed noise using total variation regularization

We present here an effective scheme for image denoising based on total variation regularization. The proposedscheme allows to efficiently remove Poisson noise as well as Gaussian noise simultaneously with the help of a newkind of data fidelity term, suitable for the mixed Poisson–Gaussian noise model. The results show that the algorithmcorresponding to our new scheme outperforms the existing methods for mixed Poisson–Gaussian noise removal.

___

  • Bertero M, Boccacci P, Desider G, Vicidomini G. Image deblurring with Poisson data: from cells to galaxies. Inverse Probl 2009; 25: 123006.
  • Pham CT, Kopylov AV. Multi-quadratic dynamic programming procedure of edge-preserving denoising for medical images. Int Arch Photogramm 2015; 40: 101-106.
  • Pham CT, Kopylov AV. Parametric procedures for image denoising with flexible prior model. In: Symposium on Information and Communication Technology; 8–9 December 2016; Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. New York, NY, USA: ACM. pp. 294-301.
  • Chan RH, Lanza A, Morigi S, Sgallari F. An adaptive strategy for the restoration of textured images using fractional order regularization. Numer Math-Theory Me 2013; 6: 276-296.
  • Wen YW, Chan RH. Parameter selection for total variation based image restoration using discrepancy principle. IEEE T Image Process 2012; 21: 1770-1781.
  • Snyder DL, Hammoud AM, White RL. Image recovery from data acquired with a charge-coupled device camera. J Opt Soc Am A 1993; 10: 1014-1023.
  • Pham CT, Kopylov AV, Dvoenko SD. Edge-preserving denoising based on dynamic programming on the full set of adjacency graphs. Int Arch Photogramm 2017; 42: 55-60.
  • Pham CT. Image processing procedures based on multi-quadratic dynamic programming. Informatica 2017; 41: 255-256.
  • Lanza A, Morigi S, Sgallari F, Wen YW. Image restoration with Poisson–Gaussian mixed noise. Comput Method Biomec 2014; 2: 12-24.[
  • Jezierska A, Chaux C, Pesquet JC, Talbot H, Engler G. An EM approach for time-variant Poisson-Gaussian model parameter estimation. IEEE T Signal Proces 2014; 62: 17-30.
  • Luisier F, Vonesch C, Blu T, Unser M. Fast interscale wavelet denoising of Poisson-corrupted images. Signal Proces 2010; 90: 415-427.
  • Rudin L, Osher S, Fatemi E. Nonlinear total variation-based noise removal algorithms. Physica D 1992; 60: 259-268.
  • Chan TF, Shen J. Image Processing and Analysis: Variational, PDE, Wavelet, and Stochastic Methods. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2005.
  • Le T, Chartrand R, Asaki TJ. A variational approach to reconstructing images corrupted by Poisson noise. J Math Imaging Vis 2007; 27: 257-263.
  • Wang W, He C. A fast and effective algorithm for a Poisson denoising model with total variation. IEEE Signal Proc Let 2017; 24: 269-273.
  • De Los Reyes JC, Schnlieb CB. Image denoising: learning the noise model via nonsmooth PDE-constrained optimization. Inverse Probl Imag 2013; 7: 1183-1214.
  • Calatroni L, De Los Reyes JC, Schnlieb CB. Infimal convolution of data discrepancies for mixed noise removal. SIAM J Imaging Sci 2017; 10: 1196-1233.
  • Dang T, Dvoenko S. Image noise removal based on total variation. Computer Optics 2015; 39: 564-571.
  • Dabov K, Foi A, Katkovnik V, Egiazarian K. Image denoising by sparse 3D transform-domain collaborative filtering. IEEE T Image Process 2007; 16: 2080-2095.
  • Tofighi M, Kose K, Cetin AE. Denoising images corrupted by impulsive noise using projections onto the epigraph set of the total variation function (PES-TV). Signal Image Video P 2015; 9: 41-48.
  • Bovik AC, Wang Z. Modern Image Quality Assessment, Synthesis Lectures on Image, Video, and Multimedia Processing. Williston, VT, USA: Morgan and Claypool Publishers, 2006.
  • Pratt WK. Digital Image Processing. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley and Sons, 2007.
  • Luisier F, Blu T, Unser M. Image denoising in mixed Poisson-Gaussian noise. IEEE T Image Process 2011; 20: 696-708.
  • Jezierska A, Chaux C, Pesquet JC, Talbot H. An EM approach for Poisson-Gaussian noise modeling. In: European Signal Processing Conference; 29 August–2 September 2011; Barcelona, Spain. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 2244-2248.
  • Immerker J. Fast noise variance estimation. Comput Vis Image Und 1996; 64: 300-302.
  • Chambolle A. An algorithm for total variation minimization and applications. J Math Imaging Vis 2004; 20: 89-97.
Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0632
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK