A new market-based approach for daily Volt/Var control of distribution systems in the presence of distributed energy resources using Benders decomposition algorithm

A new market-based approach for daily Volt/Var control of distribution systems in the presence of distributed energy resources using Benders decomposition algorithm

Distributed energy resources (DERs), if properly coordinated with other Volt/Var control (VVC) devices, could be incorporated in daily VVC problem. In this paper, a new 2-stage model is presented for daily VVC of distribution systems including DERs, taking into account environmental and economic aspects. First, in the day-ahead market, an initial environmental-economic dispatch is performed to minimize both the electrical energy costs and the gas emissions pertaining to generation units. The initial scheduling results determined by the market operator are delivered to the second stage, namely the daily optimal dispatches of VVC devices, to examine them from operational viewpoints and to yield the daily optimal dispatches of the VVC devices. The objective function of the second stage consists of the total cost of the following components: active power losses, adjustment of the initially scheduled active powers, and depreciation of switchable devices. In this paper, attention is directed towards 2 important types of DERs to be connected to the network: synchronous machine-based distributed generations and wind turbines. Because the active and reactive powers of DERs are coupled via the capability diagram, in this paper, this issue is addressed by considering the capability diagram of DERs in the proposed model. In particular, the Q-capability diagram of wind turbines should be analyzed taking the hourly wind speed fluctuations into consideration, so that delivery of a uniform reactive power can be ensured over the entire hour of operation. Due to the complexity of solving mixed integer nonlinear programming problems, an algorithm based on Benders decomposition is suggested to solve the proposed VVC model in the second stage. Finally, 2 standard distribution test networks are utilized to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

___

  • [1] Park JY, Nam SR, Park JK. Control of a ULTC considering the dispatch schedule of capacitors in a distribution system. IEEE T Power Syst 2007; 22: 755-761.
  • [2] Hu Z, Wang X, Chen H, Taylor GA. Volt/Var control in distribution systems using a time-interval based approach. IEE P Gener Transm Distrib 2003; 150: 548-554.
  • [3] Liang RH, Wang YS. Fuzzy-based reactive power and voltage control in a distribution system. IEEE T Power Deliver 2003; 18: 610-618.
  • [4] Liu MB, Canizares CA, Huang W. Reactive power and voltage control in distribution systems with limited switching operations. IEEE T Power Syst 2009; 24: 889-899.
  • [5] Al Abri RS, El-Saadany EF, Atwa YM. Optimal placement and sizing method to improve the voltage stability margin in a distribution system using distributed generation. IEEE T Power Syst 2013; 28: 326-334.
  • [6] Viawan F, Karlsson D. Voltage and reactive power control in systems with synchronous machine-based distributed generation. IEEE T Power Deliver 2008; 23: 1079-1087.
  • [7] Niknam T, Firouzi B, Ostadi A. A new fuzzy adaptive particle swarm optimization for daily Volt/Var control in distribution networks considering distributed generators. Appl Energ 2010; 87: 1919-1928.
  • [8] Azimi R, Esmaeili S. Multiobjective daily Volt/Var control in distribution systems with distributed generation using binary ant colony optimization. Turk J Elec Eng & Comp Sci 2013; 21: 613-629.
  • [9] Oshiro M, Tanaka K, Uehara A, Senjyu T, Miyazato Y, Yona A, Funabashi T. Optimal voltage control in distribution systems with coordination of distribution installations. Int J Elec Power 2010; 32: 1125-1134.
  • [10] Kim YJ, Ahn SJ, Hwang PI, Pyo GC, Moon SI. Coordinated control of a DG and voltage control devices using a dynamic programming algorithm. IEEE T Power Syst 2013; 28: 42-51.
  • [11] Mohammadi S, Mozafari B, Soleymani S. Optimal operation management of microgrids using the point estimate method and firefly algorithm while considering uncertainty. Turk J Elec Eng & Comp Sci 2014; 22: 735-753.
  • [12] Liang RH, Chen YK, Chen YT. Volt/Var control in a distribution system by a fuzzy optimization approach. Int J Elec Power 2011; 33: 278-287.
  • [13] Malekpour AR, Tabatabaei S, Niknam T. Probabilistic approach to multi- objective Volt/Var control of distribution system considering hybrid fuel cell and wind energy sources using improved shuffled frog leaping algorithm. Renew Energ 2012; 39: 228-240.
  • [14] Homaee O, Zakariazadeh A, Jadid S. Real-time voltage control algorithm with switched capacitors in smart distribution system in presence of renewable generations. Int J Elec Power 2014; 54: 187-197.
  • [15] Zakariazadeh A, Homaee O, Jadid S, Siano P. A new approach for real time voltage control using demand response in an automated distribution system. Appl Energ 2014; 117: 157-166.
  • [16] Zhong J, Bhattacharya K. Toward a competitive market for reactive power. IEEE T Power Syst 2002; 17: 1206-1215.
  • [17] Gomes MH, Saraiva JT. Allocation of reactive power support, active loss balancing and demand interruption ancillary services in MicroGrids. Electr Pow Syst Res 2010; 80: 1267-1276.
  • [18] Ozg¨onenel O, Thomas DWP. Short-term wind speed estimation based on weather data. Turk J Elec Eng & Comp ¨ Sci 2012; 20: 335-346.
  • [19] Ullah NR, Bhattacharya K, Thiringer T. Wind farms as reactive power ancillary service providers—technical and economic issues. IEEE T Energy Conver 2009; 24: 661-672.
  • [20] Zare M, Niknam T. A new multi-objective for environmental and economic management of Volt/Var control considering renewable energy resources. Energy 2013; 55: 236-252.
  • [21] Slimani L, Bouktir T. Economic power dispatch of power systems with pollution control using artificial bee colony optimization. Turk J Elec Eng & Comp Sci 2013; 21: 1515-1527.
  • [22] Wong S, Bhattacharya K, Fuller J. Long-term effects of feed-in tariffs and carbon taxes on distribution system. IEEE T Power Deliver 2010; 25: 1241-1253.
  • [23] Lamont JW, Fu J. Cost analysis of reactive power support. IEEE T Power Syst 1999; 14: 890-898.
  • [24] Ghadikolaei HM, Tajik E, Aghaei J, Charwand M. Integrated day-ahead and hour-ahead operation model of discos in retail electricity markets considering DGs and CO2 emission penalty cost. Appl Energ 2012; 95: 174-185.
Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0632
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK