A location aware history-based approach for network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks

A location aware history-based approach for network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks

Efficient decision making in vertical handoff and network selection algorithms improves users quality of service and helps users meet service requirements, anywhere and at any time. Hence, in this paper, a user-centric network selection algorithm is proposed, utilizing the estimated reputation of the available candidate networks based on user location and combined experienced users utility. User utility is defined based on 1) quality of service, 2) monetary cost, and 3) energy consumption metrics. In the proposed history aware-based user location algorithm, the past experience of users for available networks is considered to estimate the future utility that a user can obtain from a candidate network. The reputation factor for networks is used based on knowledge of users from each other while receiving service. Simulation results indicate that the average obtained utility by users is improved and handoff criteria, i.e. handoff number and failed and unnecessary handoffs, decrease. It can be seen that users choose networks with good past operations and this can encourage operators to provide good quality services for increasing their revenue.

___

  • [1] Navarro E, Medina R, Pineda-Rico U, Elias J. Application of MADM method VKOR for vertical handoff in heterogeneous wireless networks. IEICE T Commun 2012; E95-B: 599-602.
  • [2] Nguyen Q, Ghamri Y, Agoulmine N. On utility models for access network selection in wireless heterogeneous networks. In: Network Operations and Management Symposium; 7–11 April 2008; Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 144-151.
  • [3] Falowo OE, Chan HA. Dynamic RAT selection for multiple calls in heterogeneous wireless networks using group decision-making technique. Comput Netw 2012; 56: 1390-1401.
  • [4] Patel G, Dennett S. The 3GPP and 3GPP2 movements toward an all-IP mobile network. IEEE Pers Commun 2000; 7: 62-64.
  • [5] Taniuchi K, Ohba Y, Fajardo V, Das S, Tauil M, Cheng YH, Dutta A, Baker D, Yajnik M, Famolari D. IEEE 802.21: media independent handover: features, applicability, and realization. IEEE Comm Mag 2009; 47: 112-120.
  • [6] Gustafsson E, Jonsson A. Always best connected. IEEE Wirel Commun Mag 2003; 10: 49-55.
  • [7] Al-Surmi I, Othman M, Ali BM. Mobility management for IP-based next generation mobile networks: review, challenge and perspective. J Netw Comput Appl 2012; 35: 295-315.
  • [8] Yan X, Sekercioglu Y, Narayanan S. A survey of vertical handover decision algorithms in fourth generation heterogeneous wireless networks. Comput Netw 2010; 54: 1848-1863.
  • [9] Chang B, Chen J. Cross-layer-based adaptive vertical handoff with predictive RSS in heterogeneous wireless networks. IEEE T Veh Technol 2008; 57: 3679-3692.
  • [10] Tawil R, Pujolle G, Salazar O. A vertical handoff decision scheme in heterogeneous wireless systems. In: 67th Vehicular Technology Conference; 11–14 May 2008; Singapore. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 2626-2630.
  • [11] Ghahfarokhi BS, Movahedinia N. Context gathering and management for centralized context-aware handover in heterogeneous mobile networks. Turk J Electr Eng Co 2012; 20: 914-933.
  • [12] Hoon Seo S, Lee SC, Song JS. Policy based intelligent vertical handover algorithm in heterogeneous wireless networks. In: International Conference Convergence Information Technology; 21–23 November 2007; Gyeon, Korea. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1900-1905.
  • [13] Xia L, Jiang L, He C. A novel fuzzy logic vertical handoff algorithm with aid of differential prediction and predecision method. In: IEEE International Conference Communications; 24–28 June 2007; Glasgow, UK. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 5665-5670.
  • [14] Nasser N, Guizani S, Al-Masri E. Middleware vertical handoff manager: A neural network-based solution. In: International Conference on Communications; 2007; Glasgow, UK. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 5671-5676.
  • [15] Yi˘git H, Kavak A. A learning approach in link adaptation for MIMO-OFDM systems. Turk J Electr Eng Co 2013; 21: 1465-1478.
  • [16] Wang L, Binet D. MADM-based network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks: a simulation study. In: International Conference on Wireless Communication, Vehicular Technology, Information Theory and Aerospace & Electronic Systems; 17–20 May 2009; Jutland, Denmark. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 559-564.
  • [17] Chamodrakas L, Martakos D. A utility-based fuzzy TOPSIS method for energy efficient network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks. Appl Soft Comput 2011; 11 3734-3743.
  • [18] Liu H, Maciocco C, Kesavan V, Low ALY. Energy efficient network selection and seamless handovers in mixed networks. In: IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks & Workshops: 15–19 June 2009; Kos, Greece. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1-9.
  • [19] Nan W, Wenxiao S, Shaoshuai F, Shuxiang L. PSO-FNN-based vertical handoff decision algorithm in heterogeneous wireless networks. Procedia Environmental Sciences 2011; 11: 55-62.
  • [20] Y¨uksel ME, Y¨uksel AS, Zaim AH. A reputation-based privacy management system for social networking sites. Turk J Electr Eng Co 2013; 21: 766-784.
  • [21] Zekri M, Jouaber B, and Zeghlache D. On the use of network QoS reputation for vertical handover decision making. In: GLOBECOM Workshops on Handover and Network Selection in Future Broadband Networks: 6–10 December 2010; Florida, USA. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 2006-2011.
  • [22] Giacomini D, Agarwal A. Vertical handover decision making using QoS reputation and GM(1,1) prediction. In: International Conference on Communications; 10–15 June 2012; Ottawa, Canada. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 5655-5659.
  • [23] Trestian R, Ormond O, Muntean G. Reputation-based network selection mechanism using game theory. Physical Communication 2011; 4: 156-171.
  • [24] Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 1944.
  • [25] Wang L, Kuo GS. Mathematical modeling for network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks – a tutorial. IEEE Commun Surv Tut 2013; 15: 271-292.
  • [26] Xiao M, Shroff NB, Chong EKP. Utility-based power control in cellular wireless systems. In: International Conference on Computer Communications; 22–26 April 2001. pp. 412-421.
  • [27] Brans JP, Vincke P. A preference ranking organization method. Manage Sci 1985; 31: 647-656.
  • [28] Tabatabaei A, Mosavi MR. Rapid and precise GLONASS GDOP approximation using neural networks. Wireless Pers Commun 2014; 77: 2675-2685.
  • [29] Spigoni G, Busanelli S, Martal`o M, Ferrari G, Iotti N. Vertical handover in heterogeneous networks: a comparative experimental and simulation based investigation. In: Hu RQ, Qian Y, editors. Heterogeneous Cellular Networks. New York, NY, USA: Wiley, 2013. pp. 265-286.
  • [30] Pahlavan K, Krishnamurthy P. Principles of Wireless Networks: A Unified Approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, 2001.
  • [31] Munasinghe KS, Jamalipour A. An analytical evaluation of mobility management in integrated WLAN-UMTS networks. Comput Electr Eng 2008; 36: 735-751.