A hybrid numerical model for long-range electromagnetic wave propagation

A hybrid numerical model is presented for solving long range electromagnetic wave propagation problems involving objects on or above the ground surface by hybridizing the two-way split-step parabolic equation (2W-SSPE) method with the method of moments (MoM). The advantages of the proposed model are twofold: (i) It reduces the staircasing error in irregular terrain modeling, which usually occurs when the standard SSPE method is used alone. This is achieved by employing the MoM to more accurately obtain the scattered fields from slanted/curved surfaces. (ii) It enables the SSPE method to handle the problems involving objects above the Earth’s surface, which cannot be easily modeled by the standard SSPE method due to difficulty in imposing boundary conditions. The accuracy of the hybrid method is numerically verified by comparing the numerical results with those of the 2W-SSPE and the GO+UTD (geometric optic + uniform theory of diffraction) methods in some representative propagation problems.

PDF

___

[1] Leontovich MA, Fock VA. Solution of propagation of electromagnetic waves along the Earth’s surface by the method of parabolic equations. Journal of Physics USSR 1946; 10: 13-23.
[2] Hardin RH, Tappert FD. Applications of the Split-Step Fourier method to the numerical solution of nonlinear and variable coefficient wave equations. SIAM Review 1973; 15: 423-423.
[3] Feit MD, Fleck JA. Light propagation in graded-index optical fibers. Applied Optics 1978; 17 (24): 3990-3998. doi: 10.1364/AO.17.003990
[4] Lee D, Pierce AD, Shang EC. Parabolic equation development in the twentieth century. Journal of Computational Acoustics 2000; 8: 527-637. doi: 10.1142/S0218396X00000388
[5] Craig KH. Propagation modelling in the troposphere: parabolic equation method. Electronics Letters 1988; 24: 1136-1139. doi: 10.1049/el:19880773
[6] Kuttler JR, Dockery GD. Theoretical description of the parabolic approximation/Fourier split-step method of representing electromagnetic propagation in the troposphere. Radio Science 1991; 26: 381-393. doi: 10.1029/91RS00109
[7] Barrios E. A terrain parabolic equation model for propagation in the troposphere. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 1994; 42: 90-98. doi: 10.1109/8.272306 [8] Janaswamy R. A curvilinear coordinate-based split-step parabolic equation method for propagation predictions over terrain. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 1998; 46: 1089-1097. doi: 10.1109/8.704813
[9] Levy MF. Parabolic Equation Methods for Electromagnetic Wave Propagation. London: IEE Electromagnetic Wave Series 45, 2000.
[10] Apaydin G, Sevgi L. The split step Fourier and finite element based parabolic equation propagation prediction tools: canonical tests, systematic comparisons, and calibration. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine 2010; 52: 66-79. doi: 10.1109/MAP.2010.5586576
[11] Zhang P, Bai L, Wu Z, Guo L. Applying the parabolic equation to tropospheric groundwave propagation: A review of recent achievements and significant milestones. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine 2016; 58: 31-44. doi: 10.1109/MAP.2016.2541620
[12] Thomson DJ, Chapman NR. A wide-angle split-step algorithm for the parabolic equation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1983; 74: 1848-1854. doi: 10.1121/1.390272
[13] Kuttler JR. Differences between the narrow-angle and wide-angle propagators in the split-step Fourier solution of the parabolic wave equation. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 1999; 47: 1131-1140. doi: 10.1109/8.785743
[14] Ozgun O. Recursive two-way parabolic equation approach for modeling terrain effects in tropospheric propagation. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 2009; 47: 2706-2714. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2009.2027166
[15] Ozgun O, Apaydin G, Kuzuoglu M, Sevgi L. PETOOL: MATLAB-based one-way and two-way split-step parabolic equation tool for radiowave propagation over variable terrain. Computer Physics Communications 2011; 182: 2638- 2654. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2011.07.017
[16] Ozgun O, Sahin V, Erguden ME, Apaydin G, Yilmaz AE et al. PETOOL v2.0: Parabolic Equation Toolbox with evaporation duct models and real environment data. Computer Physics Communications 2020; 256: 107454. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107454
[17] Dinc E, Akan OB. Beyond-line-of-sight communications with ducting layer. IEEE Communications Magazine 2014; 52: 37–43. doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2014.6917399
[18] Lytaev MS. Nonlocal boundary conditions for split-step Pade approximations of the Helmholtz equation with modified refractive index. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 2018; 17: 1561-1565. doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2018.2855086
[19] Tepecik C, Navruz I. A novel hybrid model for inversion problem of atmospheric refractivity estimation. International Journal of Electronics and Communications 2018; 84: 258-264. doi: 10.1016/j.aeue.2017.12.009
[20] Gilles MA, Earls C, Bindel D. A subspace pursuit method to infer refractivity in the marine atmospheric boundary layer. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2019; 57: 5606–5617. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2900582
[21] Altun GY, Ozgun O. Electromagnetic propagation modeling over irregular terrain using a new hybrid method. In: The 18th Mediterranean Microwave Symposium (MMS); İstanbul, Turkey; 2018. doi: 10.1109/MMS.2018.8612013
[22] Ozgun O. New software tool (GO+UTD) for visualization of wave propagation. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine 2016; 58: 91-103. doi: 10.1109/MAP.2016.2541600
[23] Peterson AF, Ray SL, Mittra R. Computational Methods for Electromagnetics. New York: Wiley-IEEE Press, 1998.