Abdullahi Garba USMAN, Selin ISİK, Sani Isah ABBA, Filiz MERİCLİ

Artificial intelligence-based models for the qualitative and quantitative prediction of a phytochemical compound using HPLC method

Isoquercitrin is a flavonoid chemical compound that can be extracted from different plant species such as Mangifera indica (mango), Rheum nobile, Annona squamosal, Camellia sinensis (tea), and coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.). It possesses various biological activities such as the prevention of thromboembolism and has anticancer, antiinflammatory, and antifatigue activities. Therefore, there is a critical need to elucidate and predict the qualitative and quantitative properties of this phytochemical compound using the high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) technique. In this paper, three different nonlinear models including artificial neural network (ANN), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), and support vector machine (SVM),in addition to a classical linear model [multilinear regression analysis (MLR)], were used for the prediction of the retention time (tR) and peak area (PA) for isoquercitrin using PLC. The simulation uses concentration of the standard, composition of the mobile phases (MP-A and MP-B), and pH as the corresponding input variables. The performance efficiency of the models was evaluated using relative mean square error (RMSE), mean square error (MSE), determination coefficient (DC), and correlation coefficient (CC). The obtained results demonstrated that all four models are capable of predicting the qualitative and quantitative properties of the bioactive compound. A predictive comparison of the models showed that M3 had the highest prediction accuracy among the three models. Further evaluation of the results showed that ANFIS-M3 outperformed the other models and serves as the best model for the prediction of PA. On the other hand, ANN-M3proved its merit and emerged as the best model for tR simulation. The overall predictive accuracy of the best models showed them to be reliable tools for both qualitative and quantitative determination.

Keywords:

High performance liquid chromatography retention time, isoquercitrin, artificial intelligence, multilinear regression,

PDF

___

Abba SI, 2020, CHEMOMETR INTELL LAB, V201, DOI 10.1016/j.chemolab.2020.104007
Abba SI, 2020, J WATER PROCESS ENG, V33, DOI 10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.101081
Ali TA, 2016, CHINESE J ANAL CHEM, V44, pE1601, DOI 10.1016/S1872-2040(16)60899-X
Amini I, 2018, ADV J CHEM A, V1, P12, DOI DOI 10.29088/SAMI/AJCA.2018.3.1231
Bi YM, 2015, CHINESE J ANAL CHEM, V43, P1086, DOI 10.1016/S1872-2040(15)60842-8
D'Archivio AA, 2019, MOLECULES, V24, DOI 10.3390/molecules24030632
Eisinga R, 2013, INT J PUBLIC HEALTH, V58, P637, DOI 10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3
Elkiran G, 2018, GLOB J ENVIRON SCI M, V4, P439, DOI 10.22034/gjesm.2018.04.005
Elkiran G, 2019, J HYDROL, V577, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.123962
Emamghoreishi M, 2005, J ETHNOPHARMACOL, V96, P365, DOI 10.1016/j.jep.2004.06.022
Erenler R, 2018, TURK J CHEM, V42, P1695, DOI 10.3906/kim-1712-3
Granata F, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9020105
Guddat S, 2011, DRUG TEST ANAL, V3, P836, DOI 10.1002/dta.372
Khademi Faezehossadat, 2016, International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, V5, P355, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.09.003
Kim YJ, 2010, ANTIVIR RES, V88, P227, DOI 10.1016/j.antiviral.2010.08.016
Korany MA, 2012, J ADV RES, V3, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.jare.2011.04.001
Lian XH, 2019, CHINESE J ANAL CHEM, V47, P756, DOI 10.1016/S1872-2040(19)61160-6
Lu J, 2018, CHINESE J ANAL CHEM, V46, pE1817, DOI 10.1016/S1872-2040(17)61082-X
Mandal Shyamapada, 2015, Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, V5, P421, DOI 10.1016/j.apjtb.2015.04.001
Ng BK, 2016, TRAC-TREND ANAL CHEM, V80, P625, DOI 10.1016/j.trac.2015.07.015
Orhan Ilkay, 2007, Phytochemistry Reviews, V6, P189, DOI 10.1007/s11101-006-9053-x
Pham QB, 2019, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V33, P5067, DOI 10.1007/s11269-019-02408-3
Ruggieri F, 2005, J CHROMATOGR A, V1076, P163, DOI 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.04.038
Salem JH, 2010, PROCESS BIOCHEM, V45, P382, DOI 10.1016/j.procbio.2009.10.012
Sheela KG, 2013, MATH PROBL ENG, V2013, DOI 10.1155/2013/425740
Solgi A, 2017, ECOHYDROL HYDROBIOL, V17, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2017.02.002
Tuzen M, 2003, TURK J CHEM, V27, P49 .
Usman AG, 2020, CHROMATOGRAPHIA, V83, P933, DOI 10.1007/s10337-020-03912-0
Veenaas C, 2018, ANAL BIOANAL CHEM, V410, P7931, DOI 10.1007/s00216-018-1415-x
Wang XY, 2018, CHINESE J ANAL CHEM, V46, P1695, DOI 10.1016/S1872-2040(18)61121-1
Xiong XC, 2012, CHINESE J ANAL CHEM, V40, P43, DOI 10.1016/S1872-2040(11)60525-2
Yalcin FN, 2008, TURK J CHEM, V32, P457 .
Yu K, 2006, CHINESE J ANAL CHEM, V34, P561, DOI 10.1016/S1872-2040(06)60029-7