Pollen and Seed Morphology of the Genus Hesperis L. (Brassicaceae) in Turkey

Pollen and seed morphology were examined in 35 specimens representing 25 Turkish species of the taxonomically complex genus Hesperis L. by light and scanning electron microscopes. Three main types and 2 subtypes were recognized based on the seed coat surface, pollen shape, and exine sculpturing. The seed coat ornamentation of Type I was ocellate, and pollen shape was oblate-spheroidal. While Type II was represented by reticulate seed coat and prolate-spheroidal pollen shape, Type III had tuberculate seed coat. This study revealed that both palynological and seed morphological characters are of significant importance in the taxonomy of the genus.

Pollen and Seed Morphology of the Genus Hesperis L. (Brassicaceae) in Turkey

Pollen and seed morphology were examined in 35 specimens representing 25 Turkish species of the taxonomically complex genus Hesperis L. by light and scanning electron microscopes. Three main types and 2 subtypes were recognized based on the seed coat surface, pollen shape, and exine sculpturing. The seed coat ornamentation of Type I was ocellate, and pollen shape was oblate-spheroidal. While Type II was represented by reticulate seed coat and prolate-spheroidal pollen shape, Type III had tuberculate seed coat. This study revealed that both palynological and seed morphological characters are of significant importance in the taxonomy of the genus.

___

  • Andrejowski AL (1821). Hesperis L. In: DC. Syst 2: 447-448.
  • Ball PW (1964a). Hesperis L. In: Tutin TG, Heywood HV, Burges NA, Valentine DH, Walters SM & Webb DA (eds.). Flora Europaea. vol. 1. pp. 275–277. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ball PW (1964b). Hesperis matronalis L. subsp. woronowii (Busch) P.W.Ball. Feddes Rep 68: 194.
  • Bernard C (2000). Comparative seed micromorphology of Brassica L. and Sinapis L. species growing in France. Seed Sci Technol 3: 699
  • Boissier E (1867). Flora Orientalis. vol. 1. pp. 230-237. Genova.
  • Boissier E (1888). Flora Orientalis. Suppl. pp. 45-46. Genova.
  • Borbas V (1902). Species Hesperidium Hungariae atque Hatemi. Magyar Botanikai Lapok vol. 1.
  • Borbas V (1903). Species Hesperidium Hungariae atque Hatemi. Magyar Botanikai Lapok vol. 2.
  • Brochmann C (1992). Pollen and seed morphology of Nordic Draba (Brassicaceae): phylogenetic and ecological implications. Nord J Bot 1: 657-673.
  • Busch NA (1939). Hesperis L. In: Komarov VL (ed.). Flora of the USSR. vol. 8. pp. 242–251. Moskva et Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR.
  • Cullen J (1965). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Davis PH (ed.). vol. 1. pp. 452-460. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press.
  • Davis PH, Mill RR & Tan K (1988). Hesperis L. In: Davis PH, Mill RR & Tan K (eds.), Flora of Turkey and the East AegeanIslands. vol. 10. pp. 50–54. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • De Candolle AP (1824). Prodromus. vol. 1. pp. 188-190.
  • Doğan C & İnceoğlu O (1990). Pollen morphology of some Isatis L. taxa in Turkey. Turk J Bot 14:12-31.
  • Duran A & Ocak A (2005). Hesperis turkmendaghensis (sect. Hesperis) (Cruciferae / Brassicaceae), a new species from Central Anatolia region, Turkey. Bot J Linn Soc 147: 239–247.
  • Duran A (2006). Hesperis varolii (Cruciferae), a new species from southwest Anatolia region, Turkey. Ot Sistematik Botanik Dergisi 12(2): 19–30.
  • Duran A (2008). Two new species with pendulous fruits in Hesperis (Brassicaceae) from South Anatolia region, Turkey. Novon 18(4): 453-463.
  • Duran A (2009). Hesperis ozcelikii (Brassicaceae), a new species from south Anatolia region, Turkey Ann Bot Fennici 65: (in press).
  • Dvorák F (1968). Hesperis L. In: Rechinger HK (ed.) Flora Iranica. no. 57/28.2. pp. 266-273. Akademische Druck. Verlag-Sannstalt, Graz, Austria.
  • Dvorák F 1973. Infragenetic classification of Hesperis L. Feddes Rep 84: 259-271.
  • Dvorák F (1965). Hesperis novakii sp. nov. Feddes Rep 72: 22–24.
  • Dvorák F (1966). Ad Hesperidis L. generis species in Haemo crescentes adnotationes aliquae. Preslia 38: 57–64.
  • Dvorák F (1980). Hesperis L. In: Townsend CC & Guest E (eds.), Flora of Iraq, vol. 4. pp. 1039–1045. Baghdad: Ministry of Agriculture & Agrarian Reform, Republic of Iraq.
  • Engler A & Prantl K (1936). Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, band 17b. pp. 571-572. Leipzig.
  • Erdtman G (1969). Handbook of Palynology: Morphology-Taxonomy- Ecology, An Introduction to the Study of Pollen Grains and Spores. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.
  • Faegri K & Iversen J (1975). Textbook of pollen analysis. Hafner Press, New York.
  • Fournier ME (1866). Monographie du genre Hesperis. Bull. Soc. Bot. 13: 326-362.
  • Hayek A (1927). Prodromus Florae Peninsulae Balcanicae 1: 414-417.
  • İnceoğlu O & Karamustafa F (1977). The pollen morphology of plants in Ankara region II. Cruciferae. Communications 21: 111-118.
  • Koul KK, Ranjna N & Raina SN (2000). Seed coat microsculpturing in Brassica and allied genera (subtribes Brassiccinae, Raphaninae, Moricandiinae). Ann Bot 86: 385-397.
  • Löve A & Löve D (1967). The origin of the North Atlantic Flora. Aquila. Ser. Bot. 6: 52-66.
  • Murley MR (1951). Seeds of the Cruciferae of North Eastern America. Am Midl Nat 46: 1-81.
  • Pignatti S (1982). Flora d’Italia. vol. 1. pp. 389-390. Bologna.
  • S vulescu T (1955). Flora Reipublicae Romanicae. vol. 3. pp. 183-197. Editio Academiae Reipublicae Popularis Romanicae.
  • Tzvelev N (1959). The genus Hesperis in U.S.S.R. Not. Syst. vol. 19. pp. 114-155.Leningrad.
  • Van der Pluym A & Hideux M (1997). Applications d’une methodologie quantitative ála palynologie d’Eryngium maritimum (Umbelliferae). Plant Syst Evol 127: 55-85.
  • Wodehouse RR (1935). Pollen grains. McGraw-Hill. Newyork.