Gana GECHEVA, Lilyana YURUKOVA, Svetoslav CHESHMEDJIEV

Patterns of aquatic macrophyte species composition and distribution in Bulgarian rivers

The composition of aquatic bryophyte and vascular plant assemblages, and 4 environmental variables (water velocity, shading, mean depth, and substrate type), together with altitude, ecological status, and river type were monitored at 223 sites along 204 rivers during 2009 in the Pontic Province and Eastern Balkan Ecoregions, Bulgaria. The relationships between macrophytes themselves and the parameters studied were tested. Forty-nine bryophytes and 86 vascular plants were identified. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) showed that aquatic bryophytes and vascular plants are in inverse correlation. Bryophytes occurred mainly in conditions of higher altitude and ecological status; at the same time vascular plants were found in lowland river types defined by lower status and altitude. CCA also established that flow velocity was of prime importance for bryophyte distribution, while the substrate type had no significant correlation. In contrast, most vascular plants depended considerably on substrate and prefer finer types. The data also showed that shading explained the major part of vascular species variance. This study represents an important contribution to environmental monitoring and biodiversity conservation programmes. For the first time relationships between 135 macrophyte taxa and 7 environmental variables were tested. Abiotic factors were highlighted with major influence on river bryophyte and vascular plant communities.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Key words: Aquatic macrophytes, river, environmental variables, canonical correspondence analysis

Patterns of aquatic macrophyte species composition and distribution in Bulgarian rivers

Keywords:

Key words: Aquatic macrophytes, river, environmental variables, canonical correspondence analysis,

PDF

___

Birk S & Willby N (2010). Towards harmonization of ecological quality classification: establishing common grounds in European macrophyte assessment for rivers. Hydrobiologia 652: 149–163.
Birk S, Korte T & Hering D (2006). Intercalibration of assessment methods for macrophytes in lowland streams: direct comparison and analysis of common metrics. Hydrobiologia 566: 417–430.
Cesa M, Bizzotto A, Ferraro C, Fumagalli F & Nimis PL (2006). Assessment of intermittent trace element pollution by moss bags. Environmental Pollution 144: 886–892.
Cesa M, Bizzotto A, Ferraro C, Fumagalli F & Nimis PL (2010). Palladio, an index of trace element alteration for the River Bacchiglione based on Rhynchostegium riparioides moss bags. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 208: 59–77.
Chambers PA, Lacoul P, Murphy KJ & Thomaz SM (2008). Global diversity of aquatic macrophytes in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595: 9–26.
Cheshmedjiev S, Mladenov R, Belkinova D, Gecheva G, DimitrovaDyulgerova I, Ivanov P & Mihov S (2010). Development of classification system and biological reference conditions for Bulgarian rivers and lakes according to the Water Framework Directive. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment 24: 155–163.
Duncan MJ, Suren AM & Brown SLR (1999). Assessment of streambed stability in steep, bouldery streams: development of a new analytical technique. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 18: 445–456.
European Union (2000). Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Union 327: 1–72.
Janauer G, Filzmoser P, Otahelová H, Gaberscik A, Topic J, Berczik A, Igic R, Vulchev V, Sarbu A, Kohler A & Exler N (2006). Macrophyte Habitat Preference, River Restoration, and the WFD: making use of the MIDCC data base. In: Proceedings 36 th International Conference of IAD, pp. 81–85. Vienna: Austrian Committee Danube Research/IAD.
Kochev H & Jordanov D (1981). Vegetation of Water Basins in Bulgaria. Ecology, Protection and Economic Importance. Sofia: Publishing House of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (in Bulgarian).
Kohler A (1978). Methoden der Kartierung von Flora und Vegetation von Süßwasserbiotopen. Landschaft & Stadt 10: 73–85. Kozhuharov S (ed) (1992). Field Guide to the Vascular Plants in Bulgaria. Sofia: Nauka & Izkustvo (in Bulgarian).
Lang P & Murphy KJ (2012). Environmental drivers, life strategies and bioindicator capacity of bryophyte communities in highlatitude headwater streams. Hydrobiologia 679: 1–17.
Otahelová H, Valachovic M & Hrivnák R (2007). The impact of environmental factors on the distribution pattern of aquatic plants along the Danube River corridor (Slovakia). Limnologica - Ecology and Management of Inland Waters 37: 290–302. Papp B, Ganeva A & Natcheva R (2006). Bryophyte vegetation of Iskar River and its main tributaries. Phytologia Balcanica 12: 181–189.
Petrov S (1975). Bryophyta Bulgarica. Clavis Diagnostica. Sofia: BAN (in Bulgarian).
Samecka-Cymerman A, Kolon K & Kempers AJ (2002). Heavy metals in aquatic bryophytes from the Ore Mountains (Germany). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 52: 203–210.
Scarlett P & O’Hare M (2006). Community structure of in-stream bryophytes in English and Welsh rivers. Hydrobiologia 553: 143–152.
Schaug J, Rambæk JP, Steinnes E & Henry RC (1990). Multivariate analysis of trace element data from moss samples used to monitor atmospheric deposition. Atmospheric Environment 24A: 2625–2631.
Schaumburg J, Schranz C, Foerster J, Gutowski A, Hofmann G, Meilinger P, Schneider S & Schmedtje U (2004). Ecological classification of macrophytes and phytobenthos for rivers in Germany according to the Water Framework Directive. Limnology 34: 283–301.
Schaumburg J, Schranz C, Stelzer D, Hofmann G, Gutowski A & Foerster J (2006). Instruction Protocol for the Ecological Assessment of Running Waters for Implementation of the EC Water Framework Directive: Macrophytes and Phytobenthos. Munich: Bavarian Environment Agency.
Sculthorpe SD (1967). The Biology of Aquatic Vascular Plants. London: Arnold.
Ter Braak CJF & Smilauer P (2002). CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Ithaca New York: Microcomputer Power.
Smith AJE (1980). The Moss Flora of Britain and Ireland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith AJE (2004). The Moss Flora of Britain and Ireland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Solak CN, Barinova S, Ács É, Dayıoğlu H (2012). Diversity and ecology of diatoms from Felent creek (Sakarya river basin), Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany 36: 191–203.