Nutrient Contents of Pinus brutia Ten. (Pinaceae) and Pistacia terebinthus L. (Anacardiaceae) Growing on Marl and Conglomerate Substrata in the Eastern Mediterranean

The eastern Mediterranean region is one of the main areas of the Mediterranean vegetation containing Calabrian cluster pine (Pinus brutia Ten., Pinaceae) forests and terebinth (Pistacia terebinthus L., Anacardiaceae) communities. This study was carried out with the leaves, shoots, leaf litters, and soils of Calabrian cluster pine and terebinth growing on both marl and conglomerate substrata in the eastern Mediterranean region (Turkey) to determine average C, N, P and K contents, and the amounts of humic and fulvic acid in these plant soils. The average element contents of leaf, shoot, leaf litter and soil samples of both plants from the 2 different substrata were compared and exhibited only a few relatively subtle differences. The average C and N contents in the terebinth soils derived from conglomerate substratum were significantly higher than those in soils derived from marl substratum. Yet, it did not differ in the Calabrian cluster pine. While the average P and K concentrations of terebinth leaves and shoots varied significantly between the substrata, they did not vary in the Calabrian cluster pine leaves and shoots. This may due to the difference of plant species.

Nutrient Contents of Pinus brutia Ten. (Pinaceae) and Pistacia terebinthus L. (Anacardiaceae) Growing on Marl and Conglomerate Substrata in the Eastern Mediterranean

The eastern Mediterranean region is one of the main areas of the Mediterranean vegetation containing Calabrian cluster pine (Pinus brutia Ten., Pinaceae) forests and terebinth (Pistacia terebinthus L., Anacardiaceae) communities. This study was carried out with the leaves, shoots, leaf litters, and soils of Calabrian cluster pine and terebinth growing on both marl and conglomerate substrata in the eastern Mediterranean region (Turkey) to determine average C, N, P and K contents, and the amounts of humic and fulvic acid in these plant soils. The average element contents of leaf, shoot, leaf litter and soil samples of both plants from the 2 different substrata were compared and exhibited only a few relatively subtle differences. The average C and N contents in the terebinth soils derived from conglomerate substratum were significantly higher than those in soils derived from marl substratum. Yet, it did not differ in the Calabrian cluster pine. While the average P and K concentrations of terebinth leaves and shoots varied significantly between the substrata, they did not vary in the Calabrian cluster pine leaves and shoots. This may due to the difference of plant species.

___

  • Aber JD, Melillo JM & McClaugherty CA (1990). Predicting long-term patterns of mass-loss, nitrogen dynamics, and soil organic-matter formation from initial fine litter chemistry in temperate forest ecosystems. Can J Bot 68: 2201-2208.
  • Aka Sağlıker H & Darıcı C (2005). Nutrient dynamics of Olea europaea L. growing on soils derived from two different parent materials in the Eastern Mediterranean region (Turkey). Turk J Bot 29: 255- 262.
  • Atalay I (2002). Ecoregions of Turkey. İzmir: Orman Bakanlığı Yayınları 163: 108-133.
  • Allison LE & Moodie CD (1965). Carbonate. Am Soc Agron 9: 1379- 1396.
  • Binkley D, Suarez F, Rhoades C, Stottlemyer R & Valentine DW (1995). Parent material depth controls ecosystem composition and function on a riverside terrace in northwestern Alaska. Ecoscience 2: 377-381.
  • Bouyoucos GS (1951). A recalibration of the hydrometer for making mechanical analysis of soil. Agron J 43: 434-438.
  • Chapman HD (1965). Cation Exchange Capacity. Am Soc Agron 9: 891- 901.
  • Cote L, Brown S, Pare D, Fyles J & Bauhus J (2000). Dynamics of carbon and nitrogen mineralisation in relation to stand type, stand age and soil texture in the boreal mixewood. Soil Biol Biochem 32: 1079-1090.
  • Davis PH (1965). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Edinburgh: University Press.
  • Davis PH (1966). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Edinburgh: University Press.
  • Demiralay İ (1993). Toprak Fiziksel Analizleri. Erzurum: Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları 143: 78-89.
  • Duchaufour P (1970). Precis de Pedologie. Paris: Masson et Cie.
  • Finér L, Messier C De & Grandpré L (1997). Fine-root dynamics in mixed boreal conifer-broad-leafed forest stands at different successional stages after fire. Can J Forest Res 27: 304-314.
  • Haines SG & Cleveland G (1981). Seasonal variation in properties of five forest soils in southwest Georgia. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45: 139-143.
  • Heller R, Esnault R & Lance C (1993). Physiologie Végétale. Paris: Masson.
  • Hobbie SE (1992). Effects of plant species on nutrient cycling. Trends Ecol Evol 7: 36-339.
  • Hongve D (1999). Production of dissolved organic carbon in forested catchments. J Hydrol 224: 91-99.
  • Jackson ML (1958). Soil Chemical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc..
  • Jenny H (1980). The Soil Resource: Origin and Behaviour. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Klemmedson JO (1994). New Mexican locust and parent material: influence on forest floor and soil macronutrients. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58: 974-980.
  • Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE & Nizam A (1998). Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods. California: Duxbury Press.
  • Lovett GM, Weathers KC, Arthur MA & Schultz JC (2004). Nitrogen cycling in a northern hardwood forest: Do species matter? Biogeochem, 67: 289-308.
  • Madgwick HAI & Mead DJ (1990). Variation in nutrient concentrations within Pinus radiata trees and their relationship to tree size. N Z J For Sci 20: 29-38.
  • Meteoroloji Bülteni (2001). Ortalama ve Ekstrem Kıymetler. Ankara: Meteoroloji Müdürlüğü Yayınları.
  • Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS & Dean LA (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circ 939: 1-19.
  • Özbek H, Kaya Z, Gök M & Kaptan H (1995). Toprak Bilimi. Adana: Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları 73: 365-398.
  • Pastor J, Gardner RH, Dale VH & Post WM (1987). Successional changes in nitrogen availability as a potential factor contributing to spruce declines in boreal North America. Can J Forest Res 17: 1394-1400.
  • Scheffer F & Ulrich B (1960). Humus and Humusdüngung. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke.
  • Soil Survey Staff (1998). Keys to Soil Taxonomy. Washington: USDA- NRCS.
  • Smolander A & Kitunen V (2002). Soil microbial activities and characteristics of dissolved organic C and N in relation to tree species. Soil Biol Biochem 34: 651-660.
  • Stevenson FJ (1982). Humus Chemistry, Genesis, Composition, Reactions. America: University of Illinois, Department of Agronomy.
  • Walkley A & Black IA (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37: 29-38.
  • Yavitt JB (2000). Nutrient dynamics of soil derived from different parent material on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Biotropica 32: 198-207.
  • Zas R & Serrada R (2003). Foliar nutrient status and nutritional relationships of young Pinus radiata D. Don plantations in northwest Spain. Forest Ecol Manag 174: 167-176.