Molecular characterization of edible pea through EST-SSR markers

Molecular characterization of edible pea through EST-SSR markers

The genetic diversity among 23 newly developed homosegregate pea lines (Pisum sativum L.) was assessed with a total of 13 expressed sequence tag (EST) based-simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. The percentages of amplified and nonamplified primers were 92% and 8%, respectively, and 58.33% of the used primers gave the PCR product within the reported size range while 41.66% of primers gave a different product size. Polymorphism information content (PIC), major allele frequency, and variation in genetic diversity were calculated. The PIC ranged from 0.32 to 0.63 with an average of 0.50. Major allele frequency ranged from 0.48 to 0.78 with a mean value of 0.56. The variation in genetic diversity among these pea lines ranged from 0.36 to 0.68 with a mean value of 0.56. Cluster analysis based on a dendrogram divided the 23 pea lines into two main groups (L-1 and L-2), separated at 25% genetic distance. Seven subclusters were evident from these two main groups. L-1 grouped 51.2% (12 pea lines) while L-2 contained 47.8% (11 pea lines) of the total analyzed population. It was concluded that EST-SSR markers are useful for refinement of the pea linkage map.

___

  • Able JA, Langridge P, Milligan AS (2007). Capturing diversity in the cereals: many options but little promiscuity. Trends Plant Sci 12: 71-79.
  • Ahmad S, Singh M, Lamb-Palmer ND, Lefsrud M, Singh J (2012). Assessment of genetic diversity in 35 Pisum sativum accessions using microsatellite markers. Can J Plant Sci 92: 1075-1081.
  • Baranger A, Aubert G, Arnau G, Lainé A, Deniot G, Potier J, Weinachter C, Lejeune-Hénaut I, Lallemand J, Burstin J (2004). Genetic diversity within Pisum sativum using proteinand PCR-based markers. Theor Appl Genet 108: 1309-1321.
  • Belaj A, Satovic Z, Cipriani G, Baldoni L, Testolin R, Rallo L (2003). Comparative study of the discriminating capacity of RAPD, AFLP and SSR markers and of their effectiveness in establishing genetic relationships in olive. Theor Appl Genet 107: 736-744.
  • Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW (1980). Construction of genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 32: 314-331.
  • Burstin J, Potier GDJ, Weinachter C, Aubert G, Baranger A (2001). Microsatellite polymorphism in Pisum sativum. Plant Breeding 120: 311-317.
  • Caballero A, García-Dorado A (2013). Allelic diversity and its implications for the rate of adaptation. Genetics 195: 1373- 1384.
  • Cieslarová J, Hýbl M, Griga M, Smýkal P (2012). Molecular analysis of temporal genetic structuring in pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars bred in the Czech Republic and in former Czechoslovakia since the mid-20th century. Czech J Genet Plant 48: 61-73.
  • Cuevas HE, Prom LK (2013). Assessment of molecular diversity and population structure of the Ethiopian sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] germplasm collection maintained by the USDA-ARS national plant germplasm system using SSR markers. Genet Resour Crop Ev 60: 1817-1830.
  • Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB (1983). A plant DNA minipreparation: Version II. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1: 19-21.
  • Gixhari B, Pavelkov ÁM, Ismaili H, Vrapi H, Jaupi A, Smýkal P (2014). Genetic diversity of Albanian pea (Pisum sativum L.) landraces assessed by morphological traits and molecular markers. Czech J Genet Plant 50: 177-184.
  • Gong YM, Xu SC, Mao WH, Hu QZ, Zhang GW, Ding J, Li YD (2010). Developing new SSR markers from ESTs of pea (Pisum sativum L.). J Zhejiang Univ-Sc B 11: 702-707.
  • Govindaraj M, Vetriventhan M, Srinivasan M (2015). Importance of genetic diversity assessment in crop plants and its recent advances: an overview of its analytical perspectives. Genetics Research International 2015: 431487.
  • Graham PH, Vance CP (2003). Legumes importance and constraints to greater use. Plant Physiol 131: 872-877.
  • Hagenblad J, Bostrom E, Nygards L, Leino M (2014). Genetic diversity in local cultivars of garden pea (Pisum sativum L.) conserved on farm and in historical collections. Genet Resour Crop Ev 61: 413-422.
  • Izzah NK, Lee J, Perumal S, Park JY, Ahn K, Fu D (2013). Microsatellitebased analysis of genetic diversity in 91 commercial Brassica oleracea L. cultivars belonging to six varietal groups. Genet Resour Crop Ev 60: 1967-1986.
  • Jain M, Moharana KC, Shankar R, Kumari R, Garg R (2014). Genome wide discovery of DNA polymorphisms in rice cultivars with contrasting drought and salinity stress response and their functional relevance. Plant Biotechnol J 12: 253-264.
  • Khan TN, Ramzan A, Jillani G, Mehmood T (2013). Morphological performance of peas (Pisum sativum) genotypes under rainfed conditions of Potowar region. J Agric Res 51: 51-60.
  • Kumari P, Basal N, Singh AK, Rai VP, Srivastava CP, Singh PK (2013). Genetic diversity studies in pea (Pisum sativum L.) using simple sequence repeat markers. Genet Mol Res 12: 3540-3550.
  • Lewis GP, Schrire B, Mackinder B, Lock M, editors (2005). Legumes of the World. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens.
  • Li G, Quiros CF (2001). Sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP), a new marker system based on a simple PCR reaction: its application to mapping and gene tagging in Brassica. Theor Appl Genet 103: 45-46.
  • Liu K, Muse SV (2005). Power-Marker: integrated analysis environment for genetic marker data. Bioinformatics 21: 2128- 2129.
  • Loridon K, McPhee K, Morin J, Dubreuil P, Pilet-Nayel ML, Aubert G, Rameau C, Baranger A, Coyne C, Lejeune-Hènaut I et al. (2005). Microsatellite marker polymorphism and mapping in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Theor Appl Genet 111: 1022-1031.
  • Mahesh C, Tarte G, Ashok K, Nilesh C (2014). Studies on the effect of pH and temperature on the activity of esterase enzyme isolated from Pisum sativum. Asian Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Science 3: 2231-2560.
  • Martin-Sanz A, Caminero C, Jing R, Flavell AJ, Vega MP (2011). Genetic diversity among Spanish pea (Pisum sativum L.) landraces, pea cultivars and the World Pisum sp. core collection assessed by retrotransposon-based insertion polymorphisms (RBIPs). Span J Agric Res 9: 166-178.
  • McCune B, Grace JB (2005). Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data (PC-ORD ver. 5.10 MjM Software). Gleneden Beach, OR, USA: MjM.
  • Missio RF, Caixeta ET, Zambolim EM, Pena GF, Ribeiro AP, Zambolim L, Pereira AA, Sakiyama NS (2009). Assessment of EST-SSR markers for genetic analysis on coffee. Bragantia 68: 573-581.
  • Nasiri J, Haghnazari A, Saba J (2009). SSR diversity on field peas. Afr J Biotechnol 8: 3405-3417.
  • Nei M (1973). Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. P Natl Acad Sci USA 70: 3321-3323.
  • Nisar M, Ghafoor A (2010). Inheritance studies of Pisum sativum f1, f2 and f3 generation based on morphological traits and selection of high yielding powdery mildew resistant lines. Legume Genomics and Genetics 1: 18-23.
  • Nisar M, Ghafoor A, Ahmad H, Khan MR, Qureshi AS, Ali H, Aslam M (2008). Evaluation of genetic diversity of pea germplasm through phenotypic trait analysis. Pak J Bot 40: 2081-2086.
  • Nisar M, Ghafoor A, Khan MR, Qureshi AS (2006). Screening of Pisum sativum (L.) germplasm against Erysiphe pisi (Syd). in relation with vegetative traits and SDS-PAGE profile. Acta Biol Cracov Bot 48: 33-37.
  • Ramu P, Billot C, Rami JF, Senthilvel S, Upadhyaya HD, Ananda L, Hash CT (2013). Assessment of genetic diversity in the Sorghum reference set using EST-SSR markers. Theor Appl Genet 126: 2051-2064.
  • Rao NK (2004). Plant genetic resources: advancing conservation and use through biotechnology. Afr J Biotechnol 3: 136-145.
  • Sarıkamış G, Yanmaz R, Ermiş S, Bakır M, Yüksel C (2010). Genetic characterization of pea (Pisum sativum) germplasm from Turkey using morphological and SSR markers. Genet Mol Res 9: 591-600.
  • Shete S, Tiwari H, Elston RC (2000). On estimating the heterozygosity and polymorphism information content value. Theor Popul Biol 57: 265-271.
  • Simko I (2009). Development of EST-SSR markers for the study of population structure in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). J Hered 100: 256-262.
  • Smykal P, Aubert G, Burstin J, Coyne CJ, Ellis NT, Flavell AJ, Ford R, Hýbl M, Macas J, Neumann P (2012). Pea (Pisum sativum L.) in the genomic era. Agronomy 2: 74-115.
  • Taran B, Zhang C, Warkentin T, Tullu A, Vandenberg A (2005). Genetic diversity among varieties and wild species accessions of pea (Pisum sativum L.) based on molecular markers, and morphological and physiological characters. Genome 48: 257- 272.
  • Tatikonda L, Wani SP, Kannan S, Beerelli N, Sreedevi TK, Hoisington DA, Devi D, Varshney RK (2009). AFLP-based molecular characterization of an elite germplasm collection of Jatropha curcas L., a biofuel plant. Plant Sci 176: 505-513.
  • Teshome A, Bryngelsson T, Dagne K, Geleta M (2015). Assessment of genetic diversity in Ethiopian field pea (Pisum sativum L.) accessions with newly developed EST-SSR markers. BMC Genet 16: 102.
  • Varshney RK, Graner A, Sorrells ME (2005). Genic microsatellite markers in plants: features and applications. Trends Biotechnol 23: 48-55.
  • Wouw MVD, Hintum TV, Kik C, Treuren RV, Visser B (2010). Genetic diversity trends in twentieth century crop cultivars: a meta-analysis. Theor Appl Genet 120: 1241-1252.
  • Xu S, Gong Y, Mao W, Hu Q, Zhang G, Fu W, Xian Q (2012). Development and characterization of 41 novel EST-SSR markers for Pisum sativum (Leguminosae). Am J Bot 1: 1-4.
  • Zhuang X, McPhee KE, Coram TE, Peever TL, Chilvers MI (2013). Development and characterization of 37 novel EST-SSR markers in Pisum sativum (Fabaceae). Applications in Plant Sciences 1: 1-4.
  • Zietkiewiez E, Rafalski A, Labuda D (1994). Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics 20: 176-183.