Modern aproaches to floristics and their impact on the region of SW Asia

Türkçe Öz Yok

Attitudes to floristics have changed considerably during the past few decades as a result of increasing and often more focused consumer demands, heightened awareness of the threats to biodiversity, information flow and overload, and the application of electronic and web-based techniques to information handling and processing. This paper will examine these concerns in relation to our floristic knowledge and needs in the region of SW Asia. Particular reference will be made to the experience gained from the Euro+Med PlantBase project for the preparation of an electronic plant-information system for Europe and the Mediterranean, with a single core list of accepted plant names and synonyms, based on consensus taxonomy agreed by a specialist network. The many challenges - scientific, technical and organisational - that it has presented will be discussed as well as the problems of handling non-taxonomic information from fields such as conservation, karyology, biosystematics and mapping. The question of regional cooperation and the sharing of efforts and resources will also be raised and attention drawn to the recent planning workshop held in Rabat (May 2002) for establishing a technical cooperation network for taxonomic capacity building in North Africa as a possible model for the SW Asia region.

___

  • Hedge IC, Lamond JM, Davis PH, Pesmen H, Stevens PF, Matthews VA, Chamberlain DF, Herrnstadt I, Heyn CC, Snogferup S, Leute GH, Alava R & Cullen J (1972). Umbelliferae. In: Date PH (ed.), Flora of Turkey and the -East Aegean Islands. Vol 4: 265-538 Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Hedge IC, Lamond JM, Rechinger KH, Alava R, Chamberlain DF, Engstrand L, Herrnstadt I, Heyn CC, Leute GH, Mandenova I, Peev D, Pimenov MG, Snogerup S &Tamamschian SG (1987). Umbelliferae. In: Rechinger KH (ed.). Flora lranica. Lfg 162: 1-555. Graz: Akademische Druck-v. Verlagsanstalt.
  • Korovin EP & Pimenov MG & Kinzikaeva GK (1984). Umbelliferae. In: Ovczinnikov PN (ed.). Flora of Tadzhik SSR. Vol 7: 10-214. Leningrad (in Russian).
  • Mukherjee PK & Constance L (1993). Umbelliferae (Apiaceae) of India. New Delhi: Oxford & IBH Publ Co. 279 pp.
  • Nasir E (1972). Umbelliferae. İn: Naşir E & Ali SI (eds.), Flora of West Pakistan. N 20: 1-169. Rawalpindi.
  • Ohba H (1999). Umbelliferae. In: Iwatsuki K, Boufford DE & Ohba H (eds.), Flora of Japan. Vol lie: 268-303.
  • Pimenov MG (1983). Umbelliferae. In: Vvedensky AI (ed.), Conspectus Florae Asiae Mediae. Vol 7: 167-322. Tashkent (in Russian).
  • Pimenov MG (1987). Apiaceaş Lindl. (Umbelliferae Moris.). In: Charkevicz SS (ed.), Plantae Vasculares Orientis ExtremiSovietici. Vol 2: 203-277. Leningrad (in Russian).
  • Pimenov MG (1996). Apiaceae, or Umbelliferae. In: Peschkova GA (ed.), Flora Sibiriae. T 10 - Geraniaceae-Cornaceae: 123-194. Novosibirsk (in Russian).
  • Pimenov MG & Kljuykov EV (2002). Umbelliferae of Kirghyzia. KMK Sci. Press. 286 pp. (in Russian)
  • Pimenov MG & Leonov MV (1992). Computer database on the nomenclature of the Umbelliferae genera. Bot Zhurn 77: 69-77 (in Russian).
  • Pimenov MG & Leonov MV (1993). The genera of the Umbelliferae. A nomenclator. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens. 156 pp.
  • Pimenov MG, Leonov MV, Vasil'eva MG & Daushkevich JuV (1993). Computer database on the karyology of the world Umbelliferae. Bot Zhurn 78(10): 65-72 (in Russian).
  • Pimenov MG, Vasil'eva MG, Leonov MV & Daushkevich JuV (2002). Karyotaxonomical analysis in the Umbelliferae^nfield (NH), USA: Science Publishers Inc. 468 pp.
  • Shan RenHwa & Sheh MengLan (eds.) (1979, 1985, 1992). Umbelliferae. In: Flora Republicae Popularis Sinicae Vol. 55: pt. 1: 1-316 (1979); pt. 2: 1-282 (1985); pt. 3: 1-272 (1992). Beijing (in Chinese).
  • Tamamschian SG (1967). Umbelliferae. In: Grossheim AA. Flora of Caucasus, 2nd ed. Leningrad: "Nauka": 5-137 (in Russian)