___

• Angermeier PL, Karr JR (1994). Biological integrity versus biological diversity as policy directive. BioScience 44 (10): 690-697.
• APHA (1989). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 22nd ed. Washington, DC, USA: Americans Public Health Association.
• Bere T (2016). Challenges of diatom-based biological monitoring and assessment of streams in developing countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 23 (6): 5477-5486. doi: 10.1007/ s11356-015-5790-y
• Bey MY, Ector L (2013). Atlas des diatomées des cours d’eau de la région Rhône-Alpes. Tome 1 Centriques, Monoraphidées. Tome 2 Araphidées, Brachyraphidées. Tome 3 Naviculacées: Naviculoidées. Tome 4 Naviculacées: Naviculoidées. Tome 5 Naviculacées: Cymbelloidées, Gomphonématoidées. Tome 6 Bacillariacées, Rhopalodiacées, Surirellacées. Lyon, France: Direction régionale de l’Environnement, de l’Aménagement et du Logement Rhône-Alpes (in French).
• Birk S, Bonne W, Borja A, Brucet S, Courrat A et al. (2012). Three hundred ways to assess Europe’s surface waters: an almost complete overview of biological methods to implement the Water Framework Directive. Ecological Indicators 18: 31-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.10.009
• Bona F, Falasco E, Fassina S, Griselli B, Badino G (2007). Characterization of diatom assemblages in mid-altitude streams of NW Italy. Hydrobiologia 583: 265-274. doi: 10.1007/ s10750-006-0537-x
• Çelekli A, Arslanargun H, Soysal Ç, Gültekin E, Bozkurt H (2016). Biochemical responses of filamentous algae in different aquatic ecosystems in South East Turkey and associated water quality. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 133: 403-412. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.08.002
• Çelekli A, Külköylüoğlu O (2007). On the relationship between ecology and phytoplankton composition in a karstic spring (Çepni, Bolu). Ecological Indicators 7: 497-503. doi: 10.1016/j. ecolind.2006.02.006
• Çelekli A, Toudjani AA, Gümüş EY, Kayhan S, Lekesiz HÖ et al. (2019). Determination of trophic weight and indicator values of diatoms in Turkish running waters for water quality assessment. Turkish Journal of Botany 43: 90-101. doi: 10.3906/ bot-1704-40
• Cemagref (1982). Etude des méthodes biologiques quantitatives d’appréciation de la qualité des eaux. Rapport Division Qualité des Eaux Lyon. Pierre-Bénite, Farnce: Agence financiè de Bassin Rhone-Méditerarée (in French).
• Chen X, Zhou W, Pickett STA, Li W, Han L et al. (2016). Diatoms are better indicators of urban stream conditions: a case study in Beijing, China. Ecological Indicators 60: 265-274. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.039
• Cochero J, Licursi M, Gómez N (2015). Changes in the epipelic diatom assemblage in nutrient rich streams due to the variations of simultaneous stressors. Limnologica 51: 15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.limno.2014.10.004
• Dalu T, Wasserman RJ, Magoro ML, Mwedzi T, Froneman PW et al. (2017). Variation partitioning of benthic diatom community matrices: effects of multiple variables on benthic diatom communities in an Austral temperate river system. Science of the Total Environment 601-602: 73-82. doi: 10.1016/j. scitotenv.2017.05.162
• Delgado C, Pardo I (2014). Comparison of benthic diatoms from Mediterranean and Atlantic Spanish streams: community changes in relation to environmental factors. Aquatic Botany 120: 304-314. doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2014.09.010
• Delgado C, Pardo I, García L (2012). Diatom communities as indicators of ecological status in Mediterranean temporary streams (Balearic Islands, Spain). Ecological Indicators 15: 131-139. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.09.037
• Dell’Uomo A (2004). L’indice diatomico di eutrofizzazione/ polluzione (EPI-D) nel monitoraggio delle azque correnti, line guida. Camerino, Italy: Dipartimento di Botanica ed Ecologia, Universita di Camerino (in Italian).
• European Committee for Standardization (2004). Water Quality – Guidance Standard for the Identification, Enumeration and Interpretation of Benthic Diatoms from Running Waters. Brussels, Belgium: European Standard EN 13946.
• European Committee for Standardization (2014). Water Quality – Guidance for the Routine Sampling and Preparation of Benthic Diatoms from Rivers and Lakes. Brussels, Belgium: European Standard EN 13946.
• European Communities (2009). Water Framework Directive Intercalibration Technical Report. Part 2. Ispra, Italy: European Commission Joint Research Centre.
• Feld CK, Fernandes MR, Ferreira MT, Hering D, Ormerod SJ et al. (2018). Evaluating riparian solutions to multiple stressor problems in river ecosystems – a conceptual study. Water Research 139: 381-394. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.04.014
• Gomá J, Ortiz R, Cambra J, Ector L (2004). Water quality evaluation in Catalonian Mediterranean rivers using epilithic diatoms as bioindicators. Vie Milieu 54: 81-90.
• Gómez N, Licursi M (2001). The Pampean Diatome Index (PDI) for assessment of rivers and streams in Argentina. Aquatic Ecology 35: 173-181.
• Hering D, Borja A, Carstensen J, Carvalho L, Elliott M et al. (2010). The European Water Framework Directive at the age of 10: a critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future. Science of the Total Environment 408: 4007-4019. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.05.031
• Juggins S, ter Braak CFJ (1992). Calibrate-Program for SpeciesEnvironment Calibration By (Weighted Averaging) Partial Least Squares Regression. London, UK: Environmental Change Research Center.
• Karr JR (1991). Biological integrity: a long-neglected aspect of water resource management. Ecological Application 1 (1): 66-84.
• Kelly M, Juggins S, Guthrie R, Pritchard S, Jamieson J et al. (2008). Assessment of ecological status in U.K. rivers using diatoms. Freshwater Biology 53: 403-422. doi: 10.1111/j.1365- 2427.2007.01903.x
• Krammer K (2000). The genus Pinnularia. In: Lange-Bertalot H (editor). Diatoms of Europe – Diatoms of the European Inland Waters and Comparable Habitats. Ruggell, Liechtenstein: Gantner Verlag, pp. 1-703.
• Krammer K (2002). The genus Cymbella. Lange-Bertalot H (editor). Diatoms of Europe – Diatoms of the European Inland Waters and Comparable Habitats. Ruggell, Liechtenstein: Gantner Verlag, pp. 1-584.
• Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H (1991a). Bacillariophyceae. 3 Teil: Centrales. Fragilariaceae. Eunotiaceae. In: Ettl H, Gerloff J, Heynig H, Mollenhauer D (editors). Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Stuttgart, Germany: Fischer Verlag (in German). Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H (1991b). Bacillariophyceae. 4 Teil: Achnanthaceae. Kritische Erganzungen zu Navicula (Lineolatae) und Gomphonema. In: Ettl H, Gartner G, Gerloff J, Heynig H, Mollenhauer D (editors). Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Stuttgart, Germany: Fischer Verlag (in German). Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H (1997). Bacillariophyceae. 1. Naviculaceae. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa 2/1. Jena, Germany: Fischer (in German).
• Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H (1999a). Bacillariophyceae. 1 Teil: Naviculaceae. In: Ettl H, Gerloff J, Heynig H, Mollenhauer D (editors). Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Band 2. Berlin, Germany: Akademischer Verlag (in German).
• Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H (1999b). Bacillariophyceae. 2 Teil: Bacillariaceae. Epithemiaceae. Surirellaceae. In: Ettl H, Gerloff J, Heynig H, Mollenhauer D (editors). Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Band 2. Berlin, Germany: Akademischer Verlag (in German).
• Lazaridou M, Ntislidou C, Karaouzas I, Skoulikidis N (2018). Harmonisation of a new assessment method for estimating the ecological quality status of Greek running waters. Ecological Indicators 84: 683-694. doi: 10.1051/kmae/2018038
• Levkov Z (2009). Amphora sensu lato. In: Lange-Bertalot H (editor). Diatoms of Europe, Vol. 5. Ruggell, Liechtenstein: ARG Gantner Verlag, pp. 1-916.
• Lobo EA, Callegaro VLM, Hermany G, Gómez N, Ector L (2004). Review of the use of microalgae in South America for monitoring rivers, with special reference to diatoms. Vie Milieu 54: 105-114.
• Lobo EA, Wetzel CE, Ector L, Katoh K, Blanco S et al. (2010). Response of epilithic diatom communities to environmental gradients in subtropical temperate Brazilian rivers. Limnetica 29 (2): 323-340. doi: 10.23818/limn.29.27
• Mangadze T, Mwedzi T, Bere T (2015). Epilithic diatom flora in contrasting land-use settings in tropical streams, Manyame Catchment, Zimbabwe. Hydrobiologia 753: 163-173. doi: 10.1007/s10750-015-2203-7
• Oeding S, Taffs KH (2017). Developing a regional diatom index for assessment and monitoring of freshwater streams in subtropical Australia. Ecological Indicators 80: 135-146. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.009
• Pipp E (2002). A regional diatom-based trophic state indication system for running water stations in Upper Austria and its over regional applicability. Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie: Verhandlungen 27: 3376-3380. doi: 10.1080/03680770.1998.11902454
• Rimet F (2012). Recent views on river pollution and diatoms. Hydrobiologia 683: 1-24. doi: 10.1007/s10750-011-0949-0
• Rimet F, Bouchez A, Tapolczai, K. (2016). Spatial heterogeneity of littoral benthic diatoms in a large lake: monitoring implications. Hydrobiologia 771: 179-193. doi: 10.1007/s10750-015-2629-y
• Rott E, Pipp E, Pfister P (2003). Diatom methods developed for river quality assessment in Austria and a cross-check against numerical trophic indication methods used in Europe. Algological Studies 110: 91-115.
• Rott E, Pipp E, Pfister P, Van Dam H, Ortler K et al. (1999). Indikationslisten für Aufwuchsalgen in österreichischen Fliessgewässern. Teil 2: Trophieindikation (sowie geochemische Präferenzen, taxonomische und toxikologische Anmerkungen). Vienna, Austria: Wasserwirtschaftskataster, Bundesministerium f. Land-u. Forstwirtschaft, p. 248.
• Sakai M, Kawakami M, Amada K (2013). Evaluation of the water quality of the Hakata River based on diatoms. Journal of Environmental Sciences 25: 132-135. doi: 10.1016/S1001- 0742(14)60642-2
• Soininen J (2007). Environmental and spatial control of freshwater diatoms – a review. Diatom Research 22: 473-90. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.2007.9705724
• Stevenson RJ (1998). Diatom indicators of stream and wetland stressors in a risk management framework. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 51: 107-118.
• ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (2002). CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4.5). Ithaca, NY, USA: Microcomputer Power Press.
• Tornés E, Mor JR, Mandaric L, Sabater S (2018). Diatom responses to sewage inputs and hydrological alteration in Mediterranean streams. Environmental Pollution 238: 369-378.
• Toudjani AA, Çelekli A, Gümüş EY, Kayhan S, Lekesiz HÖ et al. (2017). A new diatom index to assess ecological quality of running waters: a case study of water bodies in western Anatolia. Annales de Limnologie-International Journal of Limnology 53: 333-343. doi: 10.1051/limn/2017012
• Van Dam H, Mertens A, Sinkeldam J (1994). A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology 28: 117- 184.
• Wang X, Zheng B, Liu L, Li L (2014). Use of diatoms in river health assessment. Annual Research and Review in Biology 4 (24): 4054-4074.
• Wu B, Zhao DY, Jia HY, Zhang Y, Zhang XX et al. (2009). Preliminary risk assessment of trace metal pollution in surface water from Yangtze River in Nanjing Section, China. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 82 (4): 405- 409. doi: 10.1007/s00128-009-9673-0