Bark anatomy and cell size variation in Quercus faginea

The bark structure of Quercus faginea Lam. in trees 30-60 years old grown in Portugal is described. The rhytidome consists of 3-5 sequential periderms alternating with secondary phloem. The phellem is composed of 2-5 layers of cells with thin suberised walls and narrow (1-3 seriate) tangential band of lignified thick-walled cells. The phelloderm is thin (2-3 seriate). Secondary phloem is formed by a few tangential bands of fibres alternating with bands of sieve elements and axial parenchyma. Formation of conspicuous sclereids and the dilatation growth (proliferation and enlargement of parenchyma cells) affect the bark structure. Fused phloem rays give rise to broad rays. Crystals and druses were mostly seen in dilated axial parenchyma cells. Bark thickness, sieve tube element length, and secondary phloem fibre wall thickness decreased with tree height. The sieve tube width did not follow any regular trend. In general, the fibre length had a small increase toward breast height, followed by a decrease towards the top. Fibre width decreased with height in most of the cases, but in some trees a slight increase was noticed at the top.

Bark anatomy and cell size variation in Quercus faginea

The bark structure of Quercus faginea Lam. in trees 30-60 years old grown in Portugal is described. The rhytidome consists of 3-5 sequential periderms alternating with secondary phloem. The phellem is composed of 2-5 layers of cells with thin suberised walls and narrow (1-3 seriate) tangential band of lignified thick-walled cells. The phelloderm is thin (2-3 seriate). Secondary phloem is formed by a few tangential bands of fibres alternating with bands of sieve elements and axial parenchyma. Formation of conspicuous sclereids and the dilatation growth (proliferation and enlargement of parenchyma cells) affect the bark structure. Fused phloem rays give rise to broad rays. Crystals and druses were mostly seen in dilated axial parenchyma cells. Bark thickness, sieve tube element length, and secondary phloem fibre wall thickness decreased with tree height. The sieve tube width did not follow any regular trend. In general, the fibre length had a small increase toward breast height, followed by a decrease towards the top. Fibre width decreased with height in most of the cases, but in some trees a slight increase was noticed at the top.

___

  • Arıhan O & Güvenç A (2011). Studies on the anatomical structure of stems of willow (Salix L.) species (Salicaceae) growing in Ankara province, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany 35: 535–551.
  • Babos K (1979a). Anatomische Untersuchungen der Rinde bei den Stammen von Quercus cerris var. cerris Loud. und Quercus cerris var. austrica (Willd.) Loud. Folia Dendrologica 6: 60–78.
  • Babos K (1979b). Fibre characteristics of some Cuban hardwoods. IAWA Bulletin 2/3: 61–62.
  • Babu K, Shankar SG & Rai S (2010). Comparative pharmacognostic studies on the barks of four Ficus species. Turkish Journal of Botany 34: 215–224.
  • Bailey IW & Tupper WW (1918). Size variation in tracheary cells. I. A comparison between the secondary xylems of vascular cryptogams, gymnosperms, and angiosperms. Proceedings of American Academy of Arts and Sciences 54: 149–204.
  • Chang YP (1954). Anatomy of common North American pulpwood barks. Tappi Monograph Series 14: 127–146.
  • Corcuera L, Camarero JJ & Gil-Pelegrí E (2004). Effects of a severe drought on growth and wood anatomical properties of Quercus faginea. IAWA Journal 25: 185–204.
  • Cotillas M, Sabate S, Gracia C & Espelta JM (2009). Growth response of mixed Mediterranean oak coppices to rainfall reduction. Could selective thinning have any influence on it? Forest Ecology and Management 258: 1677–1683.
  • Cufar K, Cherubinib M, Gricarc J, Prislan P, Spina S & Romagnoli M (2011). Xylem and phloem formation in chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) during the 2008 growing season. Dendrochronologia 29: 127–134.
  • Elo A, Immanen J, Nieminen K & Helariutta Y (2009). Stem cell function during plant vascular development. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 20: 1097–1106.
  • Evert RF & Eichhorn SE (2006). Esau’s Plant Anatomy, Meristems, Cells, and Tissues of the Plant Body: their Structure, Function, and Development. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Fabião A & Silva I (1996). Effect of individual tree shelters on early survival and growth of a Quercus faginea plantation. Annali Istituto Sperimentale Selvicoltura 27: 77–82.
  • Ghouse AKM & Siddiqui FA (1976). Cell length variation in phloem fibres within the bark of four tropical fruit trees, Aegle marmelos, Mangifera indica, Syzygium cumini, and Zizyphus mauritiana. Blumea 23: 13–16.
  • Graça J & Pereira H (2004). The periderm development in Quercus suber. IAWA Journal 25: 325–335.
  • Hoffmann J & Ouellet D (2005). A precise method to measure the sclereid content of kraft pulps. Pulp & Paper Canada 106: 168–172.
  • Howard ET (1977) Bark structure of the Southern Upland oaks. Wood and Fiber 9: 172–183.
  • Iqbal K & Ghouse AKM (1983). An analytical study on cell size variation in some arid zone trees of India: Acacia nilotica and Prosopis spicigera. IAWA Bulletin 4: 46–52.
  • Jorge F, Quilhó T & Pereira H (2000). Variability of fibre length in wood and bark in Eucalyptus globulus. IAWA Journal 21: 41–48.
  • Junikka L (1994). Survey of English macroscopic bark terminology. IAWA Journal 15: 3–45.
  • Jura-Morawiec J, Wiesław W, Kojs P & Iqbal M (2008). Variability in apical elongation of wood fibres in Lonchocarpus sericeus. IAWA Journal 29: 143–152.
  • Khan MA & Siddiqui MB (2007). Size variation in the vascular cambium and its derivatives in two Alstonia species. Acta Botanica Brasilica 21: 531–538.
  • Larson PR (1963). Microscopic wood characteristics and their variations with tree growth. In: Proceedings of IUFRO, Section Madison, WI, USA: IUFRO.
  • Lev-Yadun S (2010). Plant fibers: initiation, growth, model plants, and open questions. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology 57: 305–315.
  • Lev-Yadun S & Aloni R (1991). Polycentric vascular rays in Suaeda monoica and the control of ray initiation and spacing. Trees 5: 22–
  • Montserrat-Marti G, Camarero JJ, Palacio S, Pérez-Rontome C, Milla R, Albuixech J & Maestro M (2009). Summer-drought constrains the phenology and growth of two coexisting Mediterranean oaks with contrasting leaf habit: implications for their persistence and reproduction. Trees 23: 787–799.
  • Oliveira AC, Fabião A, Gonçalves AC & Correia AV (2001). O carvalho-cerquinho em Portugal. Lisbon: ISA Press.
  • Parameswaran N & Liese W (1974). Variation of cell length in bark and wood of tropical trees. Wood Science and Technology 8: 81–
  • Pereira H (2007). Cork: Biology, Production and Uses. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Pereira H, Graça J & Baptista C (1992). The effect of growth rate on the structure and compressive properties of cork from Quercus suber L. IAWA Bulletin 13: 389–396.
  • Quilhó T, Lopes F & Pereira H (2003). The effect of tree shelter on the stem anatomy of cork oak (Quercus suber) plants. IAWA Journal 24: 385–395.
  • Quilhó T, Pereira H & Richter HG (1999). Variability of bark structure in plantation-grown Eucalyptus globulus. IAWA Journal 20: 171–180.
  • Quilhó T, Pereira H & Richter HG (2000). Within-tree variation in phloem cell dimensions and proportions in Eucalyptus globulus. IAWA Journal 21: 31–40.
  • Richter HG, Viveiros S, Alves E, Luchi A & Costa C (1996). Padronização de critérios para a descrição anatómica da casca: lista de características e glossário de termos. IF Série Registros São Paulo 16: 1–25.
  • Ridoutt BG & Sands R (1994). Quantification of the processes of secondary xylem fibre development in Eucalyptus globulus at two height levels. IAWA Journal 15: 417–424.
  • Roth I (1981). Structural Patterns of Tropical Barks. Berlin: Gebruder Borntraeger.
  • Sen A, Quilhó T & Pereira H (2011a). Anatomical characterization of the bark of Quercus cerris var. cerris. Turkish Journal of Botany 35: 45–55.
  • Sen A, Quilhó T, Pereira H (2011b). The cellular structure of cork in the bark of Quercus cerris var. cerris in a materials’ perspective. Industrial Crops and Products 34: 929–936.
  • Sen A, Quilhó T & Pereira H (2012). Bark fibre dimensions in Quercus cerris var. cerris. Abstract, IUFRO Division 5, Research Group Technical Sessions. Portugal.
  • Sousa VB, Cardoso S & Pereira H (2009). A close-up view of the Portuguese oak (Quercus faginea Lam.) wood structure. In: Marušák R, Kratochvílová Z, Trnková E, Hajnala M (eds.) Proceedings of the Conference Forest, Wildlife and Wood Sciences for Society Development. Prague.
  • Spicer R & Groover A (2010). Evolution of development of vascular cambia and secondary growth. New Phytology 186: 577–592.
  • Tavares F, Quilhó T & Pereira H ( 2011). Wood and bark fiber characteristics of Acacia melanoxylon and comparison to Eucalyptus globulus. Cerne 17: 61–68.
  • Trockenbrodt M (1990). Survey and discussion of the terminology used in the bark anatomy. IAWA Bulletin 11: 141–166.
  • Trockenbrodt M (1991). Qualitative structural changes during bark development in Quercus robur, Ulmus glabra, Populus trernula and Betula pendula. IAWA Bulletin 12: 5–22.
  • Trockenbrodt M (1994). Quantitative changes of some anatomical characters during bark development in Quercus robur, Ulmus glabra, Populus tremula and Betula pendula. IAWA Journal 15: 387–398.
  • Trockenbrodt M (1995). Calcium oxalate crystals in the bark of Quercus robur, Ulmus glabra, Populus tremula and Betula pendula. Annals of Botany 75: 281–284.
  • Whitmore TC (1962). Studies in systematic bark morphology IV. The bark of beech, oak and sweet chestnut. New Phytology 62: 161–169.
Turkish Journal of Botany-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-008X
  • Yayın Aralığı: 6
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK