Salinity effects on expression of some important genes in sensitiveand tolerant grape genotypes

Salinity effects on expression of some important genes in sensitiveand tolerant grape genotypes

The effects of NaCl on expression of some genes related to salinity tolerance in grape (Vitis L.) were investigated. According to our screening study on eighteen grape genotypes, H6 and Gharashani (tolerant) and Shirazi and GhezelUzum (sensitive) were selected for molecular analysis. Our tolerant genotypes showed a higher water potential and a lower MDA content compared to other genotypes. Plants were treated with 50 mM NaCl as a critical concentration that is not lethal for grape. The expression profile of VvNHL1 in leaves of all genotypes and in roots of tolerant genotypes was similar to that of VvEDS1; these genes probably associated in defense responses. VvP450 and VvCPN21 transcripts were expected only in leaves, but they were also detected in roots. VvChS and VvPAL transcripts accumulated significantly (P < 0.05) in leaves of tolerant genotypes under salinity. Our results showed a significant difference between tolerant and sensitive genotypes and highlighted a strong relationship between the accumulation of specific transcripts and the degree of salinity tolerance.

___

  • Abbaspour N (2008). A comparative study of Cl- transport across the roots of two grapevine rootstocks, K 51-40 and Paulsen, differing in salt tolerance. PhD, School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide. Acevedo-Opazo C, Tisseyre B, Ojeda H, Ortega-Farıás S, Guillaume S (2008). Is it possible to assess the spatial variability of vine water status? J Int Sci Vigne Vin 42: 203–219.Apel K, Hirt H (2004). Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol 55: 373–399.Ashraf M (2009). Biotechnological approach of improving plant salt tolerance using antioxidants as markers. Biotechnol Adv27: 84–93.Baneyx F, Bertsch U, Kalbach CE, M van der Vies S, Soll J, Gatenby AA (1995). Spinach chloroplast cpn21 co-chaperonin possesses two functional domains fused together in a toroidal structure and exhibits nucleotide-dependent binding to plastid chaperonin 60. Journal of Biological Chemistry. J Bio Chem 270: 10695–10702. Bor MF, Zdemir Ü, Turkan I (2003). The effect of salt stress on lipid peroxidation and antioxidants in leaves of sugar beet Beta vulgaris L. and wild beet Beta maritima L. Plant Sci 164: 77–84.Carmona M, Chaib J, Martinez-Zapater J, Thomas M (2008). A molecular genetics perspective of reproductive development in grapevine. J Exp Bot 59: 2579–2596.Castellarin SD, Pfeiffer A, Sivilotti P, Degan M, Peterlunger E, Di Gaspero G (2007). Transcriptional regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in ripening fruits of grapevine under seasonal water deficit. Plant Cell Environ 30: 1381–1399.Chini A, Grant JJ, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Loake GJ (2004). Drought tolerance established by enhanced expression of the CC-NBS-LRR gene, ADR1, requires salicylic acid, EDS1 and ABI1. Plant J 38: 810–822.Chong J, Henanff GL, Bertsch C, Walter B (2008). Identification, expression analysis and characterization of defense and signaling genes in Vitis vinifera. Plant Physiol Bioch 46: 469–481.Costenaro-da-Silva D, Passaia G, Henriques JAP, Margis R, Pasquali G, Revers LF (2010). Identification and expression analysis of genes associated with the early berry development in the seedless grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivar Sultanine. Plant Sci 179: 510–519.Çulha Erdal S, Çakırlar H (2014). Impact of salt stress on photosystem II efficiency and antioxidant enzyme activities of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars. Turk J Biol 38: 549–560.Cushman JC, Bohnert HJ (2000). Genomic approaches to plant stress tolerance. Curr Opin Plant Biol 3: 117–124.Daldoul S, Chenenanoui S, Mliki A, Hofer M (2009). Improvement of an RNA purification method for grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) suitable for cDNA library construction. Acta Physiol Plant 31: 871–875.Dao TTH, Linthorst HJM, Verpoorte R (2011). Chalcone synthase and its functions in plant resistance. Phytochem Rev 10: 397–412.Dehghan S, Sadeghi M, Pöpple A, Fischer R, Lakes-Harlan R, Kavousi HR, Vilcinkas AS, Rahnamaeian M (2014). Differential inductions of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and chalcone synthase during wounding, salicylic acid treatment, and salinity stress in safflower, Carthamus tinctorius. Biosci Rep 34: 273–282.Deluc LG, Grimplet J, Wheatley MD, Tillett RL, Quilici DR, Osborne C, Schooley DA, Schlauch KA, Cushman JC, Cramer GR (2007). Transcriptomic and metabolite analyses of Cabernet Sauvignon grape berry development. BMC Genomics 8: 4–9.Dixon RA, Paiva NL (1995). Stress-induced phenylpropanoid metabolism. Plant Cell 7: 1085–1097.Ehlting J, Sauveplane V, Olry A, Ginglinger J, Provart N, Werck-Reichhart D (2008). An extensive (co-) expression analysis tool for the cytochrome P450 superfamily in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol 8: 4–7.Hahlbrock K, Scheel D (1989). Physiology and molecular biology of phenylpropanoid metabolism. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 40: 347–469.Hanania U, Velcheva M, Or E, Flaishman M, Sahar N, Perl A (2007). Silencing of chaperonin 21, that was differentially expressed in inflorescence of seedless and seeded grapes, promoted seed abortion in tobacco and tomato fruits. Transgenic Res 16: 515–525.Heath RL, Packer L (1968). Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts. Arch Biochem Biophys125: 189–198.Hernández JA, Almansa MS (2002). Short-term effects of salt stress on antioxidant systems and leaf water relations of leaves. Physiol Plant 115: 251–257.Hong Z, Lakkineni K, Zhang Z, Verma DPS (2000). Removal of feedback inhibition of D1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase results in increased proline accumulation and protection of plants from osmotic stress. Plant Physiol 122: 1129–1136.Jellouli N, Ben Jouiraa H, Skouri H, Ghorbel A, Gourgouri A, Mliki A (2008). Proteomic analysis of Tunisian grapevine cultivar Razegui under salt stress. J Plant Physiol 165: 471–481.Kamei A, Seki M, Umezawa T, Ishida J, Satou M, Akiyama K, Zhu JK, Shinozaki K (2005). Analysis of gene expression profiles in Arabidopsis salt overly sensitive mutants SOS2-1 and SOS3-1. Plant Cell Environ 28: 1567–1275.Kozian DH, Kirschbaum BJ (1999). Comparative gene expression analysis. Trends Biotechnol 17: 73–78.Lafuente MT, Sala JM, Zacarias L (2004). Active oxygen detoxifying enzymes and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase in the ethylene-induced chilling tolerance in citrus fruit. J Agric Food Chem 52: 3606–3611.Liang YC, Chen Q, Liu Q, Zhang W, Ding R (2003). Exogenous silicon (Si) increases antioxidant enzyme activities and reduced lipid peroxidation in roots of salt-stressed barley (Hordeum vulgareL.). J Plant Physiol 160: 1157–1164.Louime C, Vasanthaiah H, Jittayasothorn Y, Lu J, Basha SM, Thipyapong P, Boonkerd N (2008). A simple and efficient protocol for high quality RNA extraction and cloning of chalcone synthase partial cds from muscadine grape cultivars (Vitis rotundifolia Michx.). Eur J Sci Res 22: 232–240.Lu X, Zhao X, Wang D, Yin Z, Wang J, Fan W, Wang Sh, Zhang T, Ye W (2015). Whole-genome DNA methylation analysis in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under different salt stresses. Turk J Biol 39: 396–406.Mateo A, Mühlenbock P, Rustérucci C, Chang CCC, Miszalski Z, Karpinska B, Parker JE, Mullineaux PM, Karpinski S (2004). Lesion simulating disease 1 is required for acclimation to conditions that promote excess excitation energy. Plant Physiol 136: 2818–2830.Mohammadkhani N (2013). Evaluation of salt tolerance in different grapevine genotypes (Vitis L.) by studying ionic balance and some physiological and biochemical factors influenced by NaCl (in Persian). PhD, Biology Department, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran. Mohammadkhani N, Heidari R, Abbaspour N, Rahmani F (2013). Comparative study of salinity effects on ionic balance and compatible solutes in nine Iranian table grape (Vitis vinifera L.) genotypes. J Int Sci Vigne Vin 47: 99–114.Mohammadkhani N, Heidari R, Abbaspour N, Rahmani F (2014). Evaluation of salinity effects on ionic balance and compatible solute contents in nine grape (Vitis L.) genotypes. J Plant Nutr 37: 1817–1836.Munns R (2002). Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ 25: 239–250.Munns R, Tester M (2008). Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Ann Rev Plant Biol 59: 651–681.Nomura T, Bishop GJ (2006). Cytochrome P450s in plant steroid hormone synthesis and metabolism. Phytochem Rev 5: 421–432.Ochsenbein C, Przybyla D, Danon A, Landgraf F, Gobel C, Imboden A, Feussner I, Apel K (2006). The role of EDS1 (enhanced disease susceptibility) during singlet oxygen-mediated stress responses of Arabidopsis. Plant J 47: 445–456.Pontier D, Gan S, Amasino RM, Roby D, Lam E (1999). Markers for hypersensitive response and senescence show distinct patterns of expression. Plant Mol Biol 39: 1243–1255.Prior LD, Grieve AM, Slavich PG, Cullis BR (1992). Sodium chloride and soil texture interactions in irrigated field grown sultana grapevines. II. Plant mineral content, growth and physiology. Aust. J Agric Res 43: 1067–1083.Priya AM, Krishnan SR, Ramesh M (2015). Ploidy stability of Oryza sativa. L cv IR64 transformed with the moth bean P5CS gene with significant tolerance against drought and salinity. Turk J Biol 39: 407–416.Scholander PF, Hammel HJ, Bradstreet A, Hemmingsen EA (1965). Sap pressure in vascular plants. Science 148: 339–346.Sibille I, Ojeda H, Prieto J, Maldonado S, Lacapere JN, Carbonneau A(2007). Relation between the values of three pressure chamber modalities (midday leaf, midday stem and predawn water potential) of 4 grapevine cultivars in drought situation of the southern of France. Applications for the irrigation control. In: Proceedings of XVth Conference GESCO, Porec, Croatia, pp. 685–695.Solecka D, Kacperska A (2003). Phenylpropanoid deficiency affects the course of plant acclimation to cold. Physiol Plantarum 119: 253–262.Tattersall EAR, Grimplet J, DeLuc L, Wheatley MD, Vincent D, Osborne C, Ergül A, Lomen E, Blank RR, Schlauch KA et al. (2007). Transcript abundance profiles reveal larger and more complex responses of grapevine to chilling compared to osmotic and salinity stress. Funct Integr Genomics 7: 317–333.Troggio M, Pezzulli S, Pindo M, Malacarne G, Fontana P, Moreira FM, Costantini L, Grando MS, Viola R, Velasco R (2008). Beyond the genome, opportunities for a modern viticulture: a research overview. Am J Enol Vitic 59: 117–127.Varet A, Parker J, Tornero P, Nass N, Nurnberger T, Dangl JL, Scheel D, Lee J (2002). NHL25 and NHL3, two NDR1/HIN1-like genes in Arabidopsis thaliana with potential role(s) in plant defense. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 15: 608–616.Vincent D, Ergul A, Bohlman MC, Tattersall EA, Tillett RL, Wheatley MD, Woolsey R, Quilici DR, Joets J, Schlauch K et al. (2007). Proteomic analysis reveals differences between Vitis viniferaL. cv. Chardonnay and cv. Cabernet Sauvignon and their responses to water deficit and salinity. J Exp Bot 58: 1873–1892.Wagner D, Przybyla D, Camp R, Kim C, Landgraf F, Lee KP, Wursch M, Laloi C, Nater M, Hideg E et al. (2004). The genetic basis of singlet oxygen-induced stress responses of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 306: 1183–1185.Zenoni S, Ferrarini A, Giacomelli E, Xumerle L, Fasoli M, Malerba G, Bellin D, Pezzotti M, Delledonne M (2010). Characterization of transcriptional complexity during berry development in Vitis vinifera using RNA-Seq. Plant Physiol 152: 1787–1795.