Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of five inbred maize lines with the Brittle 2 gene

Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of five inbred maize lines with the Brittle 2 gene

The Brittle 2 (Bt2) gene encodes a small subunit of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGPase) enzyme, one of the enzymes that play an important role in endosperm starch biosynthesis. We carried out a study to transfer the Bt2 gene into several inbred maize lines and regenerate transgenic maize plants possessing the transgene, which can be used to further study the role of the Bt2 gene in starch biosynthesis. Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains C58 and EHA105 harboring the transformation vector pCambia2300/Ubi-Bt2-Nos were used to transfer the Bt2 gene into five inbred maize lines, H14, H26, H240, H95, and N18. Transformed calli were selected on selection medium containing 100 mg/L of kanamycin. The stable integration of the Bt2 gene into transgenic plants was confirmed by Southern hybridizations. We recorded the different transformation frequencies in the experiments with A. Tumefaciens strains C58 and EHA105. Transgenic plants were regenerated from transformed calli of all five studied maize lines. Transformation frequencies varied from 1.09% to 2.33%, depending on maize genotypes. The results obtained show that our transformation system is effective for numerous maize genotypes. H95 and H240 are good lines for gene transfer in maize.

___

  • Bae JM, Giroux M, Hannah L (1990). Cloning and characterization of the Brittle-2 gene of maize. Maydica 35: 317-322.
  • Bohorova NE, Luna B, Briton RM, Huerta LD, Hoistington DA (1995). Regeneration potential of tropical, subtropical, midaltitude, and highland maize inbreds. Maydica 40: 275-281.
  • Chapman MA, Burke JM (2006). Letting the gene out of the bottle: the population genetics of genetically modified crops. New Phytol 70: 429-443.
  • Chu CC, Wang CC, Sun CS, Hsu C, Yin KC, Chu CY, Bi FY (1975). Establishment of an efficient medium for another culture of rice through comparative experiments on the nitrogen sources. Sci Sinica 18: 659-668.
  • Darbani B, Farajma S, Toorchi M, Noeparvar S, Stewart N, Mohammed S, Zakerbostanabad S (2008a). Plant transformation: needs and futurity of the transgenes. Biotechnology 7: 403-412.
  • Darbani B, Farajma S, Toorchi M, Zkerbastanabad S, Noeparvar S, Stewart N (2008b). DNA delivery methods to produce transgenic plants. Biotechnology 7: 385-402.
  • Duncan DR, Williams ME, Zehr BE, Widholm JM (1985). The production of callus capable of plant regeneration from immature embryos of numerous Zea mays genotypes. Planta 165: 322-332.
  • Frame BR, Shou H, Chikwamba HRK, Zhang Z, Xiang C, Fonger T, Pegg SE, Li B, Nettleton D, Pei P et al. (2002). Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of maize embryos using a standard binary vector system. Plant Physiol 129: 13-22
  • Godon-Kamm WJ, Spencer TM, Mangano ML, Adams TR, Daines RJ, Start WG, O’Brien IV, Chambers SA, Adams WR Jr, Willetts NG et al. (1990). Transformation of maize cells and regeneration of fertile transgenic plants. Plant Cell 2: 603-618.
  • Gorji AH, Zolnoori M, Jamasbi A, Zolnoori Z (2011). In vitro plant generation of tropical maize genotypes. In: 2011 International Conference on Environmental, Biomedical and Biotechnology. Singapore: IACSIT Press, pp. 52-59.
  • Green CE, Phillips RL (1975). Plant regeneration from tissue cultures of maize. Crop Sci 15: 417-421.
  • Hansen G (2000). Evidence for Agrobacterium-induced apoptosis in maize cells. Mol Plant Microbe In 13: 649-657.
  • Ishida Y, Saito H, Hiei Y, Komar T (2003). Improved protocol for transformation of maize (Zea mays L.) mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Biotechnol 20: 57-66.
  • Ishida Y, Saito H, Ohta S, Hiei Y, Komari T, Kumashiro T (1996). High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L.) mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Nat Biotechnol 14: 745-750.
  • James C (2014). Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2014. ISAAA Brief No. 49. Ithaca, NY, USA: ISAAA.Ji Q, Xu X, Wang K (2013). Genetic transformation of major cereal crops. Int J Dev Biol 57: 495-508.
  • Karthikeyan A, Shilpha J, Pandian SK, Ramesh M (2012). Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of indica rice cv. ADT 43. Plant Cell Tiss Org 109: 153-165.
  • Li N, Zhang S, Zhao Y, Li B, Zhang J (2011). Over-expression of AGPase genes enhances seed weight and starch content in transgenic maize. Planta 233: 241-250.
  • Li XG, Chen SB, Lu ZX, Chang TJ, Zeng QC, Zhu Z (2002). Impact of copy number on transgene expression in tobacco. Acta Bot Sin 44: 120-123.
  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bio-assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plantarum 15: 473-497.
  • Oduor RO, Njagi ENM, Ndungu S, Machuka JS (2006). In vitro regeneration of dryland Kenyan maize genotypes through somatic embryogenesis. International Journal of Botany 2: 146-151.
  • Ombori O, Muoma JVO, Machuka J (2012). Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of selected tropical inbred and hybrid maize (Zea mays L.) lines. Plant Cell Tiss Org 113: 11-23.
  • Saghai-Maroof MA, Soliman KM, Jorgensen RA, Allard RW (1984).
  • Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. P Natl Acad Sci USA 81: 8014-8018.
  • Seth MS, Bedada LT, Mneney EE, Oduor RO, Machuka JS (2012). In vitro regeneration of selected commercial Tanzanian open pollinated maize varieties. Afr J Biotechnol 11: 6043-6049.
  • Sharma M, Kothari-Chajer A, Jagga-Chugh S, Kothari SL (2011). Factors influencing Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation of Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn. Plant Cell Tiss Org 105: 93-104.
  • Shou H, Frame BR, Whitham SA, Wang K (2004). Assessment of transgenic maize events produced by particle bombardment or Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Mol Breeding 13: 201-208.
  • Shrawat AK, Lorz H (2006). Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of cereals: a promising approach crossing barriers. Plant Biotechnol 4: 575-603.
  • Song G, Walworth A, Hancock JF (2012). Factors affecting Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of switch grass cultivars. Plant Cell Tiss Org 108: 445-453.
  • Surekha C, Arundhati A (2007). Differential response of Cajanus cajan varieties to transformation with different strains of Agrobacterium. Journal of Biological Sciences 7: 176-181.
  • Takavar S, Rahnama H, Rahimian H, Kazemitabar K (2010). Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of maize (Zea maysL.). Journal of Sciences, Islamic Republic of Iran 21: 21-29.
  • Tran TL, Nguyen TT, Nguyen TN, Nguyen DT (2014). Transferring Shrunken 2 (Sh2) gene coding for ADP-Glucose pyrophosphorylase enzyme into some inbred maize lines by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated gene transfer. Vietnam Journal of Biology 36: 99-109 (article in Vietnamese with English abstract).
  • Travella S, Ross SM, Harden S, Everett C, Snappe JW, Harwood WA (2005). A comparison of transgenic barley lines produced by particle bombardment and Agrobacterium-mediated techniques. Plant Cell Rep 23: 780-789.
  • Wilson LM, Whitt SR, Ibanez AM, Rocheford TR, Goodman MM, Buckler ES (2004). Dissection of maize kernel composition and starch production by candidate gene association. Plant Cell 16: 2719-2733.
  • Zhang W, Subbarao S, Addae P, Shen A, Armstrong C, Peschke V, Gilbertson L(2003). Cre/lox-mediated marker gene excision in transgenic maize (Zea mays L.) plants. Theor Appl Genet 10: 1157-1168.
  • Zhang Y, Yin X, Yang A, Li G, Zhang J (2005). Stability of inheritance of transgenes in maize (Zea mays L.) lines produced using different transformation methods. Euphytica 144: 11-22.
  • Zhao Z, Gu W, Cai T, Tagliani L, Hondred D, Bond D, Schroeder S, Rudert M, Pierce D (2001). High throughput genetic transformation mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens in maize. Mol Breeding 18: 323-333.