Genetic and phenotypic variation among Turkish terrestrial orchid species as revealed by RAPD and morphological characteristics

  Terrestrial orchid species are natural sources of salep and a closely related group of plant species widely distributed throughout Turkey. The phylogenetic relationship among fourteen different tuber-producing orchid species was investigated after analyzing phenotypic and genetic variation within and among the natural population through fifteen morphometric traits and ten random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) primer combinations. Statistical analyses (principal component analysis (PCA), principal coordinate analysis (PCoA), and cluster analysis) using the generated data identified taxonomic and genetic distance within the studied plant samples. The results of PCA from morphological traits show that there are no major groupings within and among different species instead somehow overlapping with few distinctly characterized species. In addition, the UPGMA-based phenogram with Euclidean distance (0-1) produces five major clusters among the studied orchid species according to their taxonomic status with few exceptions. On the other hand, PCoA and the phylogenetic dendrogram with the coefficient (0.56-0.79) from RAPD band profiles determine the true genetic diversity of those species. Although both combinations of genetic and phenotypic characteristics reveal the phylogenetic relationship of some those studied species very effectively, they are not clear for others. These results suggest that in the natural population of terrestrial orchid species significant amounts of gene flow are ongoing at intra/interspecies level. Therefore, it is recommended that conservation studies of these groups of orchid species should be done as a geographical unit rather than according to taxonomic status.

___

  • Ahmadian M, Babaei A, Ahmadi N, Rasoli O (2017). Genome size diversity of some species of Cephalanthera from Iran. Caryologia 18: 1-5.
  • Altundag E, Sevgi E, Kara O, Sevgi O, Tecimen HB, Bolat I (2012). Comparative morphological, anatomical and habitat studies on Dactylorhiza romana (Seb.) Soo subsp. Romana and Dactylorhiza romana (Seb.) Soo subsp. georgica (Klinge) Soo ex. Renz and Taub. (Orchidaceae) in Turkey. Pak J Bot 44: 143- 152.
  • Arduino P, Cianchi R, Rossi W, Corrias B, Bullini L (1995). Genetic variation in Orchis papilionacea ( Orchidaceae ) from Central Mediterranean region: taxonomic inferences at the intraspecific level. Plant Syst Evol 194: 9-23.
  • Arduino P, Verra F, Cianchi R, Rossi W, Corrias B, Bullini L (1996). Genetic variation and natural hybridization between Orchis laxiflora and Orchis palustris (Orchidaceae). Plant Syst Evol 202: 87-109.
  • Aremu CO (2017). Genetic diversity: a review for need and measurements for intraspecies crop improvement. J Microbiol Biotechn Research 1: 80-85.
  • Aybeke M, Sezik E, Olgun G (2010). Vegetative anatomy of some Ophrys , Orchis and Dactylorhiza (Orchidaceae) taxa in Trakya region of Turkey. Flora 205: 73-89.
  • Balestrini R, Nerva L, Sillo F, Girlanda M, Perotto S (2014). Plant and fungal gene expression in mycorrhizal protocorms of the orchid Serapias vomeracea colonized by Tulasnella calospora . Plant Signal Behav 9: e977707.
  • Batty AL, Dixon KW, Brundrett MC, Sivasithamparam K (2002). Orchid conservation and mycorrhizal associations. In: Sivasithamparam K, Dixon KW, Barrett RL, editors. Microorganisms in Plant Conservation and Biodiversity. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer, pp. 195-226.
  • Caputo P, Aceto S, Cozzolıno S, Nazzaro R (1997). Morphological and molecular characterization of a natural hybrid between Orchis laxiflora and O. morio (Orchidaceae). Plant Syst Evol 205: 147-155.
  • Curuk P, Sogut Z, Izgu T, Sevindik B, Tagipur EM, da Silva JA, Serce S, Solmaz I, Kacar YA, Mendi NY (2016). Morphological characterization of Cyclamen sp. grown naturally in Turkey: Part II. Acta Sci Pol Hortorum Cultus 15: 205-224.
  • Dalar A, Konczak I (2012). Botanicals from Eastern Anatolia Region of Turkey: antioxidant capacity and phenolic constituents of endemic herbal medicines. J Herb Med 2: 126-135.
  • Dalar A, Konczak I (2013). Phenolic contents, antioxidant capacities and inhibitory activities against key metabolic syndrome relevant enzymes of herbal teas from Eastern Anatolia. Ind Crops Prod 44: 383-390.
  • Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB (1983). A plant DNA mini- preparation: version 2. Plant Mol Biol Report 1: 19-22.
  • D’Emerico S, Bianco P, Pignone D (1996a). Cytomorphological characterization of diploid and triploid individuals of Orchis ×gennarii Reichenb. Fil. ( Orchidaceae ). Caryologia 49: 153- 161.
  • D’Emerico S, Pignone D, Bianco P (1996b). Karyomorphological analyses and heterochromatin characteristics disclose phyletic relationships among 2n = 32 and 2n = 36 species of Orchis (Orchidaceae) . Plant Syst Evol 200: 111-124.
  • Deniz İG, Sümbül H, Sezik E (2015). A morphological investigation on non-appendix Ophrys L. (Orchidaceae) taxa in Antalya province. Biol Divers Conserv 8: 43-61.
  • Ehlers BK, Olesen JM, Agren J (2002). Floral morphology and reproductive success in the orchid Epipactis helleborine : regional and local across-habitat variation. Plant Syst Evol 236: 19-32.
  • Ghorbani A, Gravendeel B, Selliah S, Zarré S, Boer H (2017). DNA barcoding of tuberous Orchidoideae: a resource for identification of orchids used in salep. Mol Ecol Resour 17: 342-352.
  • Harvais G, Hadley G (1967). The relation between host and endophyte in orchid mycorrhiza. New Phytol 66: 205-215.
  • Hossain MM (2010). Therapeutic orchids: traditional uses and recent advances - an overview. Fitoterapia 82: 102-140.
  • Hršak V, Brana S, Sedlar Z, Pejić I, Hr (2011). Morphometric and molecular (RAPD) analysis of six Serapias taxa from Croatia. Biologia 66: 55-63.
  • Jacquemyn H, Brys R, Adriaens D, Honnay O, Roldán-Ruiz I (2009b). Effects of population size and forest management on genetic diversity and structure of the tuberous orchid Orchis mascula . Conserv Genet 10: 161-168.
  • Jacquemyn H, Wiegand T, Vandepitte K, Brys R, Roldán‐Ruiz I, Honnay O. (2009a) Multi-generational analysis of spatial structure in the deceptive orchid Orchis mascula . J Ecol 97: 206-216.
  • Jakubska-Busse A, Gola EM (2010). Morphological variability of Helleborines. I. Diagnostic significance of morphological features in Epipactis helleborine (L.) Crantz, Epipactis atrorubens (Hoffm.) Besser and their hybrid, Epipactis ×schmalhausenii Richt.(Orchidaceae, Neottieae). Acta Soc Bot Pol 79: 207-213.
  • Judd WS, Campbell CS, Kellogg EA, Stevens PF, Donoghue MJ (2008). Plant systematics: a phylogenetic approach. Ecol Mediterr 25: 215.
  • Kasparek M, Grimm U (1999). European trade in Turkish salep with special reference to Germany. Econ Bot 53: 396-406.
  • Kaya S, Tekin AR (2001). The effect of salep content on the rheological characteristics of a typical ice-cream mix. J Food Eng 47: 59-62.
  • Kliphuis E (1963). Cytological observations in relation to the taxonomy of the orchids of the Netherlands. Plant Biol 12: 172- 194.
  • Kretzschmar H, Eccarius W, Dietrich H (2007). The Orchid Genera Anacamptis , Orchis and Neotinea . Bürgel, Germany: Echino Media Verlag.
  • Molnár A, Süveges K, Molnár Z, Löki V (2017). Using traditional ecological knowledge in discovery of rare plants: a case study from Turkey. Acta Soc Bot Pol 86: 3541.
  • Pareek N, Jakhar ML, Malik CP (2017). Analysis of genetic diversity in coriander ( Coriandrum sativum L.) varieties using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers. J Microbiol Biotechn Research 1: 206-215.
  • Punja ZK, Rodriguez G, Chen S (2017). Assessing genetic diversity in Cannabis sativa using molecular approaches. In: Chandra S, Lata H, ElSohly M, editors. Cannabis sativa L. - Botany and Biotechnology. Cham, Germany: Springer, pp. 395-418.
  • Rasmussen HN, Rasmussen FN (2007). Trophic relationships in orchid mycorrhiza –diversity and implications for conservation. Lankesteriana 7: 1-2.
  • Scacchi R, Angelis GD, Lanzara P (1990). Allozyme variation among and within eleven Orchis species (fam. Orchidaceae), with special reference to hybridizing aptitude. Genetica 81: 143-150.
  • Şekercioğlu ÇH, Anderson S, Akçay E, Bilgin R, Can ÖE, Semiz G, Tavşanoğlu Ç, Yokeş MB, Soyumert A, Ipekdal K, Sağlam İK (2011). Turkey’s globally important biodiversity in crisis. Biol Conserv 144: 2752-2769.
  • Sevgi E, Altundag E, Kara OM, Sevgi O, Tecimen HB, Bolat I (2012). Studies on the morphology, anatomy and ecology of Anacamptis pyramidalis (L.) LCM Richard (Orcidaveae) in Turkey. Pak J Bot 44: 135-141.
  • Sezik E (2002). Turkish orchids and salep. Acta Pharm Turcica 44: 151-157.
  • Steinbrück G, Schlegel M, Dahlström I, Röttger B (1986). Characterization of interspecific hybrids between Orchis mascula and Orchis pallens (Orchidaceae) by enzyme electrophoresis. Plant Syst Evol 153: 229-241.
  • Sultana N, Sultana SS, Alam SS (2013). Karyotype and RAPD analysis to elucidate taxonomic status in two morphological forms of Egeria densa Planch. and Hydrilla verticillata (Lf ) Royle. Cytologia 78: 277-284.
  • Yıldız M, Ekbiç E, Düzyaman E, Serçe S, Abak K (2016). Genetic and phenotypic variation of Turkish Okra ( Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) accessions and their possible relationship with American, Indian and African germplasms. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol 3: 234-244.