Generation of transgenic sugar beet (Beta vulgarism L.) overexpressing the polygalacturonase inhibiting protein 1 of Phaseolus vulgaris (PvPGIP1) through Agrobacterium-mediated transformation

Numerous diseases caused by fungal pathogens influence the annual production of sugar beet. In order to obtain a plant resistant to fungi, genetic transformation has been applied to the sugar beet. To invade a plant tissue, phytopathogenic fungi produce several cell wall-degrading enzymes (CWDEs); polygalacturonases (PGs) are pathogenicity factors produced at the earlier stages of a fungal infection that depolymerize the homogalacturonan. One of the strategies used by plants to limit the degradation of the cell wall polysaccharides by fungal CWDEs is the production of proteinaceous inhibitors. Against fungal, microbial, and insect PGs, plants produce cell wall-associated polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins (PGIPs). The overexpression of PGIPs improves the resistance to fungal and bacterial necrotrophs in different plants. In this research, the gene encoding the PGIP1 fused downstream of the leader sequence for secretion in the extracellular environment was isolated from Phaseolus vulgaris and cloned into the expression vector pBI121 for the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sugar beet. Modified transformation protocol and selection strategies were developed. In comparison with the preexisting methods, the transformation efficiency was increased and different cultivars were transformed, highlighting the general effectiveness of the method applied. The presence of the transgene and the activity of PvPGIP1 were confirmed by PCR and agarose diffusion assay analyses, respectively, and the present and copy number of the transgene in the T0 plants' genome were demonstrated by Southern blot.

Generation of transgenic sugar beet (Beta vulgarism L.) overexpressing the polygalacturonase inhibiting protein 1 of Phaseolus vulgaris (PvPGIP1) through Agrobacterium-mediated transformation

Numerous diseases caused by fungal pathogens influence the annual production of sugar beet. In order to obtain a plant resistant to fungi, genetic transformation has been applied to the sugar beet. To invade a plant tissue, phytopathogenic fungi produce several cell wall-degrading enzymes (CWDEs); polygalacturonases (PGs) are pathogenicity factors produced at the earlier stages of a fungal infection that depolymerize the homogalacturonan. One of the strategies used by plants to limit the degradation of the cell wall polysaccharides by fungal CWDEs is the production of proteinaceous inhibitors. Against fungal, microbial, and insect PGs, plants produce cell wall-associated polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins (PGIPs). The overexpression of PGIPs improves the resistance to fungal and bacterial necrotrophs in different plants. In this research, the gene encoding the PGIP1 fused downstream of the leader sequence for secretion in the extracellular environment was isolated from Phaseolus vulgaris and cloned into the expression vector pBI121 for the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sugar beet. Modified transformation protocol and selection strategies were developed. In comparison with the preexisting methods, the transformation efficiency was increased and different cultivars were transformed, highlighting the general effectiveness of the method applied. The presence of the transgene and the activity of PvPGIP1 were confirmed by PCR and agarose diffusion assay analyses, respectively, and the present and copy number of the transgene in the T0 plants' genome were demonstrated by Southern blot.

___

  • Aguero CB, Uratsu SL, Greve C, Powell ALT, Labavitch JM, Meredith CP, Dandekar AM (2005). Evaluation of tolerance to Pierce’s disease and botrytis in transgenic plants of Vitis vinifera L. expressing the pear PGIP gene. Mol Plant Pathol 6: 43–51.
  • Atkinson RG, Schroder R, Hallett IC, Cohen D, MacRae EA (2002). Over expression of polygalacturonase in transgenic apple trees leads to a range of novel phenotypes involving changes in cell adhesion. J Plant Physiol 129: 122–133.
  • Benedetti M, Leggio C, Federici L, De Lorenzo G, Pavel NV, Cervone F (2012). Structural resolution of the complex between a fungal polygalacturonase and a plant polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein by small angle X-ray scattering. Plant Physiol 157: 599–607.
  • Benito EP, ten Have A, van’t Klooster JW, van Kan JAL (1998). Fungal and plant gene expression during synchronized infection of tomato leaves by Botrytis cinerea. Eur J Plant Pathol 104: 207– 220.
  • Bosemark NO (1993). Genetics and breeding. In: Cooke DA, Scott RK, editors. The Sugar Beet Crop: Science into Practice. London, UK: Chapman & Hall, pp. 37–66.
  • Casasoli M, Federici L, Spinelli F, Di Matteo A, Vella N, Scaloni F, Fernandez-Recio J, Cervone F, De Lorenzo G (2009). Integration of evolutionary and desolvation energy analysis identifies functional sites in a plant immunity protein. P Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 7666–7671.
  • Cervone F, De Lorenzo G, Pressey R, Darvill AG, Albersheim P (1990). Can Phaseolus PGIP inhibit pectic enzymes from microbes and plants? Photochemistry 29: 447–449.
  • Cooke DA (1993). Pests. In: Cooke DA, Scott RK, editors. The Sugar Beet Crop: Science into Practice. London, UK: Chapman & Hall, pp. 428–483.
  • D’Halluin K, Bossut M, Bonne E, Mazur B, Leemans J, Botterman J (1992a). Transformation of sugar-beet (Beta vulgaris L.) and evaluation of herbicide resistance in transgenic plants. Bio- Technol 10: 309–314.
  • D’Halluin K, De Block M, Denecke J, Janssen J, Leeman J, Raynaert A (1992b). The bar gene as selectable and screenable marker in plant engineering. Methods Enzyme 216: 415e26.
  • Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB (1983). A plant DNA minipreparation: Version II. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1: 19–20.
  • De Lorenzo G, D’Ovidio R, Cervone F (2003). The role of polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins (PGIP) in defence against pathogenic fungi. Ann Rev Phytopathol 39: 313–335.
  • D’Ovidio R, Raiola A, Capodicasa C, Devoto A, Pontiggia D, Roberti S, Galletti R, Conti E, O’Sullivan D, De Lorenzo G (2004). Characterization of the complex locus of bean encoding polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins reveals sub- functionalization for defense against fungi and insects. Plant Physiol 135: 2424–2435.
  • Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990). Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12: 13–15.
  • Faize M, Sugiyama T, Faize L, Ishii H (2003). Polygalacturonase- inhibiting protein (PGIP) from Japanese pear: possible involvement in resistance against scab. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 63: 319–327.
  • Federici L, Di Matteo A, Fernandez Recio J, Tsernoglou D, Cervone F (2006). Polygalacturonase inhibiting proteins: players in plant innate immunity? Trends Plant Sci 11: 65–70.
  • Ferrari S, Sella L, Janni M, De Lorenzo G, Favaron F, D’Ovidio R (2012). Transgenic expression of polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins in Arabidopsis and wheat increases resistance to the flower pathogen Fusarium graminearum. Plant Biol 14: 31–38.
  • Ferrari S, Vairo D, Ausubel FM, Cervone F, De Lorenzo G (2003). Tandemly duplicated Arabidopsis genes that encode polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins are regulated coordinately by different signal transduction pathways in response to fungal infection. Plant Cell 15: 93–106.
  • Gregori R, Mari M, Bertolini P, Sanudo Barajas JA, Tian JB, Labavitch JM (2008). Reduction of Colletotrichum acutatum infection by a polygalacturonase inhibitor protein extracted from apple. Postharvest Biol Technol 48: 309–313.
  • Gurel E, Gurel S, Lemaux PG (2008). Biotechnology applications for sugar beet. CRC Cr Rev Plant Sci 27: 108–140.
  • Hadfield KA, Bennett AB (1998). Polygalacturonases: many genes in search of a function. Plant Physiol 117: 337–343.
  • Hall RD, Riksen-Gruinsma T, Weyens GJ, Rosquin IJ, Denys PN, Evans IJ, Lathouwers JE, Lefebvre MP, Dunwell JM, Tunen AV et al. (1996). A high efficiency technique for the generation of transgenic sugar beet from stomatal guard cells. Nat Biotechnol 14: 1133–1138.
  • Harveson RM, Rush CM (1995a). Evaluation of genetic variability among Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. betae isolates by vegetative compatibility. Phytopathology 85: 11–17.
  • Harveson RM, Rush CM (1995b). Studies of vegetative compatibility among isolates of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. betae causing different disease symptoms. J Sugar Beet Res 32: 142.
  • Harveson RM, Rush CM (1997). Genetic variation among Fusarium oxysporum isolates from sugar beet as determined by vegetative compatibility. Plant Dis 81: 85–89.
  • Hashimoto R, Shimamoto Y (2001). Transgenic sugar beet plants harboring a pumpkin chitinase gene demonstrating improved resistance to Rhizoctonia solani. Proc Jpn Soc Sugar Beet Technol 43: 24–28.
  • Hill AL, Reeves RL, Larson RL, Fenwick AL, Hanson LE, Panella L (2011). Genetic variability among isolates of Fusarium oxysporum from sugar beet. Plant Pathol 60: 496–505.
  • Hisano H, Kimoto Y, Hayakawa H, Takeichi J, Domae T, Hashimoto R (2004). High frequency Agrobacterium mediated transformation and plant regeneration via direct shoot formation from leaf explants in Beta vulgaris and Beta maritima. Plant Cell Rep 22: 910–918.
  • Iglesias VA, Moscone EA, Papp I, Neuhuber F, Michalowski S, Phelan T, Spiker S, Matzke M, Matzke AJM (1997). Molecular and cytogenetic analyses of stably and unstably expressed transgene loci in tobacco. Plant Cell Rep 9: 1251–1264.
  • Ivic-Haymes SD, Smigocki AC (2005). Biolistic transformation of highly regenerative sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) leaves. Plant Cell Rep 23: 699–704.
  • Jacq B, Lesobre O, Sangwan RS, Sangwan BS (1993). Factors influencing T-DNA transfer in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sugar beet. Plant Cell Rep 12: 621–624.
  • Jafari M, Norouzi P, Malbobi MA, Ghareyazei B, Valizadeh M, Mohammadi SA, Mousavi A (2009). Enhanced resistance to a lepidopteran pest in transgenic sugar beet plants expressing synthetic cry1Ab gene. Euphytica 165: 333–344.
  • Janni M, Sella L, Favaron F, Blechl AE, De Lorenzo G, D’Ovidio R (2008). The expression of a bean PGIP in transgenic wheat confers increased resistance to the fungal pathogen Bipolaris sorokiniana. MPMI 21: 171–177.
  • Joersbo M (2007). Sugar beet. In: Pua EC, Davey MR. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, Vol. 59. Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 355–379.
  • Joersbo M, Donaldson I, Kreiberg J, Petersen SG, Brunstedt J, Okkels FT (1998). Analysis of mannose selection used for transformation of sugar beet. Mol Breeding 4: 111–117.
  • Joubert DA, Kars I, Wagemakers L, Bergmann C, Kemp G, Vivier MA, van Kan JAL (2007). A polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein from grapevine reduces the symptoms of the endopolygalacturonase BcPG2 from Botrytis cinerea in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves without any evidence for in vitro interaction. Mol Plant Microbe In 20: 392–402.
  • Joubert DA, Slaughter AR, Kemp G, Becker JVW, Krooshoof GH, Bergmann C, Benen J, Pretorius IS, Vivier MA (2006). The grapevine polygalacturonase inhibiting protein (VvPGIP1) reduces Botrytis cinerea susceptibility in transgenic tobacco and differentially inhibits fungal polygalacturonases. Transgenic Res 15: 687–702.
  • Kortekamp A (2006). Expression analysis of defence related genes in grapevine leaves after inoculation with a host and a non-host pathogen. Plant Physiol Biochem 44: 58–67.
  • Krens FA, Trifonova A, Keizer LCP, Hall RD (1996).The effect of exogenously applied phytohormones on gene transfer efficiency in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Plant Sci 116: 97–106.
  • Krens FA, Zijistra CJ, Molen W, Jamar D, Huizing HJ (1988). Transformation and regeneration in sugar beet induced by ‘shooter’ mutants of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Euphytica 5: 185–194.
  • Leckie F, Mattei B, Capodicasa C, Hemmings A, Nuss L, Aracri B, De Lorenzo G, Cervone F (1999). The specificity of polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein (PGIP): A single amino acid substitution in the solvent-exposed β-strand/β-turn region of the leucine-rich repeats (LRRs) confers a new recognition capability. EMBO J 18: 2352–2363.
  • Li J, Brunner AM, Meilan R, Strauss SH (2008). Stability of transgenes in trees: expression of two reporter genes in poplar over three field seasons. Tree Physiol 29: 299–312.
  • Lindsey K, Gallois P (1990). Transformation of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J Exp Bot 41: 529– 536.
  • Lionetti V, Francocci F, Ferrari S, Volpi C, Bellincampi D, Galletti R, D’Ovidio R, De Lorenzo G, Cervone F (2010). Engineering the cell wall by reducing de-methyl-esterified homogalacturonan improves saccharification of plant tissues for bioconversion. P Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 616–621.
  • Mahmodi SB, Soltani J (2006). Rot root in Iran. Central Study and Research Industrial Sugar Beet of Iran Journal 178: 14–18 (in Persian with abstract in English).
  • Manfredini C, Sicilia F, Ferrari S, Pontiggia D, Salvi G, Caprari C, Lorito M, De Lorenzo G (2005). Polygalacturonase- inhibiting protein 2 of Phaseolus vulgaris inhibits BcPG1, a polygalacturonase of Botrytis cinerea important for pathogenicity, and protects transgenic plants from infection. Physiol Mol Plant P 67:108–115.
  • Martin GB, Bogdanove AJ, Sessa G (2003). Understanding the functions of plant disease resistance proteins. Annu Rev Plant Biol 54: 23–61.
  • Mattei B, Bernalda M, Federici L, Roepstorff P, Cervone F, Boffi A (2001). Secondary structure and post-translational modifications of the leucine-rich repeat protein PGIP (polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein) from Phaseolus vulgaris. Biochemistry 40: 569–576.
  • Mohammadzadeh R, Zamani MR, Motallebi M, Norouzi P, Jourabchi E, Benedetti M, De Lorenzo G (2012). Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated introduction of polygalacturonase inhibiting protein 2 gene from Phaseolus vulgaris (PvPGIP2) into sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). AJCS 6: 1290–1297.
  • Oelofse D, Dubery IA, Meyer R, Arendse MS, Gazendam I, Berger DK (2006). Apple polygalacturonase inhibiting protein1 expressed in transgenic tobacco inhibits polygalacturonases from fungal pathogens of apple and the anthracnose pathogen of lupins. Phytochemistry 67: 255–263.
  • Powell AL, van Kan J, ten Have A, Visser J, Greve LC, Bennett AB, Labavitch JM (2000). Transgenic expression of pear PGIP in tomato limits fungal colonization. Mol Plant Microbe In 13: 942–950.
  • Protsenko MA, Bulantseva EA, Korableva NP (2010). Polygalacturonase inhibiting proteins in plant fleshy fruits during their ripening and infections. Russ J Plant Physl+ 57: 356–362.
  • Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989). Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
  • Sambrook J, Russell DW (2001). Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 3rd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
  • Snyder GW, Ingersoll JC, Smigocki AC, Owens LD (1999). Introduction of pathogen defence genes and a cytokinin biosynthesis gene into sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) by Agrobacterium or particle bombardment. Plant Cell Rep 18: 829–834.
  • Tamura M, Gaob M, Tao R, Labavitch JM, Dandekar AM (2004). Transformation of persimmon with a pear fruit polygalacturonase inhibiting protein (PGIP) gene. Sci Hort 103: 19–30.
  • Torki M, Mandaron P, Mache R, Falconet D (2000). Characterization of a ubiquitous expressed gene family encoding polygalacturonase in Arabidopsis thaliana. Gene 242: 427–436.
  • Zakharchenko NS, Kalyaeva MA, Bur’yanov YI (2000). The method for genetic transformation of different sugar beet varieties. J Plant Physiol 47: 70–75.
  • Zamani MR, Motallebi M, Rostamian A (2004). Characterization of Iranian isolates of Fusarium oxysporum on the basis of RAPD analysis, virulence, and vegetative compatibility. Phytopathology 152: 499–503.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Sequencing of plant genomes ? a review

Mine TÜRKTAŞ, Kuaybe Yücebilgili KURTOĞLU, Gabriel DORADO, Baohong ZHANG, Pilar HERNANDEZ, Turgay ÜNVER

Genetic variability, heritability, and genetic advance in strawberry(Fragaria × ananassa Duch.)

PRANAV KUMAR MISHRA, RAM BADAN RAM, NEERAJ KUMAR

Sources of genetic resistance in maize to Fusarium stalk rot andtheir variations at molecular level

Sajjad Hussain QURESHI, Abdul QAYYUM, Will FIERS

Transcriptome characterization and large-scale identification of SSR/SNPmarkers in symbiotic nitrogen fixation crop faba bean (Vicia faba L.)

SUNDAN SURESH, TAE-SUNG KIM, SEBASTIN RAVEENDAR, JOON-HYEONG CHO, JUNG YOON YI, MYUNG CHUL LEE, SOK-YOUNG LEE, HYUNG-JIN BAEK, GYU-TAEK CHO, JONG WOOK CHUNG

Single nucleotide polymorphism discovery through Illumina-based transcriptome sequencing and mapping in lentil

HÜLYA YILMAZ TEMEL, DENİZ GÖL, HİLAL BETÜL KAYA AKKALE, ABDULLAH KAHRİMAN, Muhammed Bahattin TANYOLAÇ

Identification of expressed resistance gene analog sequences in coconut leaf transcriptome and their evolutionary analysis

Muliyar Krishna RAJESH, Kaitheri Edathil RACHANA, Sudalaimuthu Asari NAGANEESWARAN, Rahman SHAFEEQ, Regi Jacob THOMAS, Mohammed SHAREEFA, Babu MERIN, Karun ANITHA

Physiological characteristics, antioxidant enzyme activities, and gene expression in 2 spring canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivars under drought stress conditions

SEYED MOHAMMAD HOSSEINI, TAHEREH HASANLOO, SAEED MOHAMMADI

Genetic variability, heritability, and genetic advance in strawberry(Fragaria × ananassa Duch.)

Pranav Kumar MISHRA, Ram Badan RAM, Neeraj KUMAR

Cytoplasmic-nuclear variation in a diversity-fixed foundation set ofBrassica juncea (L.) Czern & Coss.

JAVED AKHATAR, NITIN KUMAR, CHHAYA ATRI, SURINDER SINGH BANGA

Molecular cloning of BnZEP and its expression in petals of different colors inBrassica napus L.

JUN JIANG, LUSHEN TIAN, SHIXING GUO, QINGQING YU, Dezhi ZENG, YINGZE NIU