Design and development of a front mounted on-the-go soil strength profile sensor

Design and development of a front mounted on-the-go soil strength profile sensor

Soil compaction is a great problem since it affects crop growth and yield. The causes of soil compaction are the managementpractices in agricultural production. A common practice is to implement subsoiling at a few centimeters below the hardpan.Management practices, field traffic, and variations of the soil’s physical and chemical properties throughout the field cause variations inthe soil compaction degree and depth. Subsoiling at certain depths can cause excessive energy consumption at a high cost. Therefore,agricultural tillage equipment could be improved by varying the tillage depth. Soil strength is the main indicator that depends on severalsoil properties such as bulk density, moisture, and organic soil texture content for determining the compaction level. The goal of thisstudy was to develop an on-the-go sensor. It measured soil strength at multiple depths in order to determine the depth of the compactedsoil layers. The mechanical frame of the sensor (body) was designed using Solidworks 3D CAD Design Software. Depth measurementswere based on the Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) system. The data-gathering algorithm was developed with Phoenix ContactPC WORX software. It recorded the data flowing from the load cells, calculated the depth of the hardpan, and altered the depth of thechisel. In order to calibrate the load cell and compensate for differences among the load cells, static tests were conducted in a laboratory.The consistency of the sensing tips in terms of the input load – output load harmony was in linear format with higher R2 values rangingbetween 0.98 and 0.99. Consequently, the on-the-go soil sensor was developed for variable depth subsoiling. Dynamic tests revealed thatthe sensor was capable of monitoring the soil strength through the profile in order to determine the compaction level and hardpan depth.Moreover, the sensor was capable of adopting itself to crop varieties that have different critical compaction levels for root penetration.

___

  • Alimardani R (2005). Design and construction of a tractor mounted penetrometer. Journal of Agriculture & Social Sciences 1: 297- 300.
  • ASABE (2010). ASABE Standards: Standards Engineering Practices Data. St. Joseph, MI, USA: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.
  • ASAE (2002). ASABE Standards: Procedures for Using and Reporting Data Obtained with the Soil Cone Penetrometer (EP542).
  • St. Joseph, MI, USA: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.
  • ASAE (2004). ASABE Standards: Standards Engineering Practices Data. St. Joseph, MI, USA: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.
  • Bengough AG, Mullins CE (1990). Mechanical impedance to root growth: a review of experimental techniques and root growth responses. J Soil Sci 41: 341-358.
  • Çakır E, Gülsoylu E, Yalçın H, Aykas E (2007). Soil compaction: causes, consequences, solutions and effects on Turkish farming system. In: Proceedings of Soil Dynamics Workshop, 14–15 June 2007, İzmir, Turkey. İzmir, Turkey: Agricultural Machinery Department of Ege University, pp. 47-58.
  • Chukwu E, Bowers CG (2005). Instantaneous multiple-depth soil mechanical impedance sensing from a moving vehicle. T ASAE 48: 885-894.
  • Chung SO, Sudduth KA (2003a). Modeling Soil Failure Caused by Prismatic and Conical Tools. ASAE Paper No. 031028. St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASAE.
  • Chung SO, Sudduth KA (2003b). Characterization of Soil Strength Data for an On-the-Go Sensor. ASAE Paper No. MC03203. St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASAE.
  • Chung SO, Sudduth KA (2006). Soil failure models for vertically operating and horizontally operating strength sensors. T ASABE 49: 851-863.
  • Chung SO, Sudduth KA, Hummel JW (2003). On-the-Go Soil Strength Profile Sensor Using a Load Cell Array. ASAE Paper No. 031071. St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASAE.Chung SO, Sudduth KA, Hummel JW (2006). Design and validation of an on-the-go soil strength profile sensor. T ASABE 49: 5-14.
  • Chung SO, Sudduth KA, Motavalli PP, Kitchen NR (2004a). Relating On-the-Go-Soil Strength Data to Cone Index. ASAE Paper No. MC04205. St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASAE.
  • Chung SO, Sudduth KA, Plouffe C, Kitchen NR (2004b). Evaluation of an On-the-Go Soil Strength Profile Sensor Using Soil Bin and Field Data. ASAE Paper No. 041039. St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASABE.
  • Chung SO, Sudduth KA, Tan J (2005). Variability Structure of Onthe-Go Soil Strength Sensor Data. ASAE Paper No. 051039. St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASABE.
  • Cockroft B, Barley KP, Greacen EL (1969). The penetration of clays by fine probes and root tips. Soil Res 7: 333-348.
  • Fiskell JGA, Carlisle VW, Kaashirad R, Hutton CE (1968). Effect of soil strength on root penetration in coarse-textured soils. J Geol 1: 793-802.
  • Fountas S, Paraforos D, Cavalaris C, Karamoutis C, Gemtos T, AbuKhalaf N, Tagarakis A (2013). Five-point penetrometer with GPS for measuring soil compaction variability. Comput Electron Agr 96: 109-116.
  • Fulton JP, Wells LG, Shearer SS, Barnhisel RI (1996). Spatial Variation Of Soil Physical Properties: A Precursor to Precision Tillage.
  • ASAE Paper No. 96-1012. St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASAE. Gaultney LD (1989). Prescription Farming Based on Soil Property Sensors. ASAE Paper No. 89-1036. St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASAE.
  • Goodson R, Letlow R, Rester D, Stevens J (2000). Use of precision agriculture technology to evaluate soil compaction. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Southern Conservation Tillage Conference for Sustainable Agriculture, 19–21 June 2000, Monroe, LA, USA, pp. 23-30.
  • Hemmat A, Adamchuk VI (2008). Sensor systems for measuring soil compaction: review and analysis. Comput Electron Agr 63: 89- 103.
  • Khalilian A, Han YJ, Dodd RB, Sullivan MJ, Gorucu S, Keskin M (2002). A Control System for Variable Depth Tillage. ASAE Paper No. 021209. St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASAE.
  • Kumar M, Dadhich H, Dahich SM (2015). Development of a tractor operated soil compaction measurement device. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Technologies for Sustainable Development, 4–6 February 2015, Mumbai, India, pp. 1-4.
  • Materechera SA, Dexter AR, Alston AM (1991). Penetration of very strong soils by seedling roots of different plant species. Plant Soil 135: 31-34.
  • Perumperal JV (1987). Cone penetrometer applications-a review. T ASAE 30: 939-944.
  • Raper RL (2003). Soil Compaction Management. 1st ed. Encyclopedia of Agricultural, Food, and Biological Engineering. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.
  • Raper RL, Washington BH, Jarrell JD (1999). A tractor-mounted multiple-probe soil cone penetrometer. Appl Eng Agric 15: 287-290.
  • Sedaghat HN (2012). Designing an (on the go) soil strength sensor to determine the hardpan depth. MSc, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey. Smith CW (2007). An Automatic Depth Control System for the On-the-Go Soil Strength Sensor. Auburn, AL, USA: Auburn University.
  • Sun Y, Lin J, Ma D, Zeng Q, Schulze Lammers P (2007). Measurement of penetration force using a Hall-current-sensor. Soil Tillage Res 92: 264-268.
  • Taylor HM, Burnett E (1964). Influence of soil strength on the rootgrowth habits of plant. Soil Sci 98: 174-180.
  • Taylor HM, Locke LF, Box JE (1964). Pans in southern Great Plains soils III. Their effects on yield of cotton and grain sorghum. Agron J 56: 542-545
  • Taylor HM, Ratliff LF (1999). Root elongation rates of cotton and peanuts as a function of soil strength and soil water content. Soil Sci 108: 113-119.
  • Taylor HM, Roberson GM, Parker JJ (1966). Soil strength and seedling penetration relations for medium to coarse-textured soil materials. Soil Sci 102: 18-22.
  • Tekin AB (2016). Tarım 4.0. Tokat, Turkey: Endüstri 4.0 Paneli (in Turkish).
  • Tekin Y, Kul B, Okursoy R (2008). Sensing and 3D mapping of soil compaction. Sensors 8: 3447-3459.
  • Topakci M, Unal I, Canakci M, Celik HK, Karayel D (2010). Design of a horizontal penetrometer for measuring on-the-go soil resistance. Sensors 10: 9337-9348.
  • Topp GC, Lapen DR, Edwards MJ (2003). Laboratory calibration, infield validation and use of a soil penetrometer measuring cone resistance and water content. Vadose Zone J 2: 633-641.
  • Way TR, Kishimoto T, Torbert AH, Burt ED, Bailey AC (2007). Tractor tire aspect ratio effects on soil bulk density and cone index. In: Proceeding of Soil Dynamics Workshop, 14–15 June 2007, İzmir, Turkey. İzmir, Turkey: Agricultural Machinery Department of Ege University, pp. 27-47.
  • Wells L, Stombaugh TS, Shearer SA (2003). Crop yield response to precision deep tillage. T ASABE 48: 895-901.