Changes in the forage yield and quality of legume–grass mixtures throughout a vegetation period

The aim of the present study was to determine the changes in the forage yield and quality of binary and ternary mixtures of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), red clover (Trifolium pratense L.), smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis Leys.), orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.), and meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis Huds.) throughout a vegetation period. Plots were established in 2008 in Isparta, Turkey, in a randomized complete block design with 3 replicates. Four cuttings were done during the 2009 and 2010 vegetative periods. The levels of crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and relative feed value (RFV) were determined for each monoculture and mixture. The highest total dry matter yields were obtained from the alfalfa-smooth bromegrass mixture at 16.65 t ha-1 in 2009 and 16.00 t ha-1 in 2010. Red clover exhibited the lowest NDF (368 g kg-1) and ADF (256 g kg-1) concentrations compared with the other forage plants, whereas alfalfa displayed the highest CP content (181 g kg-1). The RFV of the mixtures ranged from 107 to 145, and the decrease in yield was larger for the grasses than the legumes throughout the vegetation period. The results indicated that alfalfa-smooth bromegrass, alfalfa-orchardgrass, and alfalfa-meadow fescue mixtures could make valuable legume-grass mixtures.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Key words: Alfalfa, red clover, smooth bromegrass, mixture, seasonal variation

Changes in the forage yield and quality of legume–grass mixtures throughout a vegetation period

Keywords:

Key words: Alfalfa, red clover, smooth bromegrass, mixture, seasonal variation,

PDF

___

Açıkgöz E (2001) Forage Crops. Uludağ University Faculty of Agriculture Publications, Bursa.
Akgül M, Başayiğit L (2005) Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Çiftlik arazisinin detaylı toprak etüdü ve haritalanması. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi J Nat Appl Sci 9: 54–63.
Albayrak S, Ekiz H (2005) An investigation on the establishment of artificial pasture under Ankara’s ecological conditions. Turk J Agric For 29: 69–74.
Albayrak S, Türk M, Yüksel O, Yılmaz M (2011) Forage yield and the quality of perennial legume–grass mixtures under rainfed conditions. Not Bot Horti Agrobot Cluj 391: 114–118. Aydın N, Mut Z, Mut H, Ayan I (2010) Effect of autumn and spring sowing dates on hay yield and quality of oat (Avena sativa L.) genotypes. J Anim Vet Adv 9: 1539–1545.
Baba M, Halim RA, Alimon AR, Abubakar I (2011) Grass-legume mixtures for enhanced forage production: analysis of dry matter yield and competition indices. Afr J Agr Res 6: 5242– 52
Berdahl JD, Karn JF, Hendrickson JR (2001) Dry matter yields of cool-season grass monocultures and grass–alfalfa binary mixtures. Agron J 93: 463–467.
Rowell DR (1996) Soil Science: Methods and Applications. Longman, Harlow.
Sanderson M (2010) Nutritive value and herbage accumulation rates of pastures sown to grass, legume, and chicory mixtures. Agron J 102: 728–733.
Sanderson MA, Brink G, Ruth L, Stout R (2012) Grass–legume mixtures suppress weeds during establishment better than monocultures. Agron J 104: 36–42.
SAS Institute (1998) SAS/STAT Users’ Guide, Release 7.0. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.
Serin Y, Gokkuş A, Tan M, Çomaklı B, Koç A (1998) Determination of suitable forage crop species and their mixtures for meadow establishment. Turk J Agric For 22: 13–20.
Sleugh B, Moore KJ, George LR, Brummer CE (2000) Binary legume–grass mixtures improve forage yield, quality, and seasonal distribution. Agron J 92: 24–29.