Bread wheat responds salt stress better than einkorn wheat does during germination

Bread wheat responds salt stress better than einkorn wheat does during germination

Salt stress during germination degenerates crop establishment and declines yield in wheat (Triticum subsp.). Against salt (NaCl) stress, we investigated 12 bread (Triticum aestivum L.) and 10 einkorn wheat (T. monococcum subsp. monococcum) entries for germination rate, germinating power, coleoptile length, shoot length, root length, shoot/root length ratio, root fresh weight, root dry weight, and root fresh/dry weigh ratio. An effective blocking in variance analysis improved statistical significance and differentiation between germination stages and wheat entries. Salt total and salt ranking tolerance indices grouped the wheat entries into tolerant (Bayraktar 2000, Gerek 79, İkizce 96, Gün 91, Demir 2000, and Momtchil) and susceptible ones (Population-4, Population-14, Population-15, Population-9, Population-11, and Population-10). The best coleoptile length and root fresh weight developments occurred between 0 and 0.15 M and root length between 0 and 0.10 M salt doses. Coleoptile length, root fresh weight, and root dry weight started decreasing at 0.20 M. Pearson linear correlation coefficients were significant at different levels for coleoptile length, root fresh weight, and root dry weight. Spearman correlation coefficients were not significant between the worst salt affected characters of coleoptile length, shoot length, root length, root fresh weight, and root dry weight characters under the control treatment but were significant under salt stress. A significant PC value of 0.356 was recorded for root dry weight, 0.335 for root length, 0.310 for shoot root length ratio, and 0.309 for root fresh weight in PC 1. The first three PCs accounted for 90.52% of total variation. The highest PC was PC1 (71.946%), followed by PC2 (11.098%), and PC3 (7.481%). The dendrogram of all wheat entries clearly differentiated bread and einkorn wheats as both salt indices did. Here, it seemed, then, that those bread wheat cultivars were more salt tolerant than einkorn populations, most likely because of their geographic origin differences.

___

  • Abdelkader S, Ramzi Ch, Mustapha R, Houcine B, M’barek BN, Inagaki MN, Abdallah B (2015). Effect of salt stress on germination and biological growth of 50 genotypes of durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf). Pak J Nutri 14: 957-963.
  • Abdoli M, Saeidi M (2012). Effects of water deficiency stress during seed growth on yield and its components, germination and seedling growth parameters of some wheat cultivars. Ann Biol Res 3: 1322-1333.
  • Askari H, Kazemitabar SK, Zarrini HN, Saberi MH (2016). Salt tolerance assessment of barley (Hordeum vulagare L.). Open Agric 1: 37-44.
  • Biabani A, Hamideh H, Mosarreza VT (2013). Salinity effect of stress on germination of wheat cultivars. Inter J Agric Food Sci Tech 4: 263-268.
  • Braun HJ, Ekiz H, Eser V, Keser M, Ketata H, Marcucci G, Morgounov AI, Zencirci N (1998). Breeding priorities of winter wheat programs. In Braun HJ, Altay F, Kronstad WE, Beniwal SPS, McNab A, editors. Wheat: Prospects for Global Improvement. Proceedings of the 5th International Wheat Conference, Ankara, Developments in Plant Breeding, Vol. 6: Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 553-560.
  • Braun HJ, Zencirci N, Altay F, Atli A, Avci M, Eser V, Kambertay M, Payne TS (2001). Turkish wheat pool. In: Bonjean AP, Angus WJ, editors. World Wheat Book – A History of Wheat Breeding, Paris, France: Laroisier Publishing, pp. 851-879.
  • Colmer TD, Epstein E, Dvorak J (1995). Differential solute regulation in leaf blades of various ages in salt-sensitive wheat and a salt-tolerant wheat x Lophopyrum elongatum (host) a. Love amphiploid. Plant Physiol 108: 1715-1724.
  • El-Hendawy SE, Hu Y, Yakout GM, Awad AM, Hafiz SE, Schmidhalter U (2005). Evaluating salt tolerance of wheat genotypes using multiple parameters. Eu J Agr 22: 243-253.
  • Eren H, Pekmezci MY, Okay S, Turktas M, Inal B, Ilhan E, Atak M, Erayman M, Unver T, Unver CT (2015). Hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum) root miRNome analysis in response to salt stress. Ann App Bio 167: 2-30.
  • Farhad Md, Abdul Hakim Md, Ashraful A Md, Barma NCD (2014). Screening wheat genotypes for coleoptile length: A trait for drought tolerance. Am J Agric For 2: 237-245.
  • Gomez K, Gomez AA (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd Edition. New York, NY, USA: Wiley.
  • Goutam U, Kukreja S, Tiwari R (2013). Biotechnological approaches for grain quality improvement in wheat: present status and future possibilities. Aust J Crop Sci 7: 469-483.
  • Hair JF Jr, Anderson RE, Tatham RL (1987). Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings. New York, NY, USA: Macmillan.
  • Huang S, Spielmeyer W, Lagudah ES, James R, Platten JD, Dennis ES, Munns R (2006). A sodium transporter (hkt7) is a candidate for Nax 1, a gene for salt tolerance in durum wheat. Plant Physiol 142: 1718-1727.
  • Izadi MH, Rabbani J, Emam Y, Pessarakli M, Tahmasebi A (2014). Effects of salinity stress on physiological performance of various wheat and barley cultivars. J Plant Nutr 37: 520-531.
  • Kalaycı Ş (2006). SPSS Uygulamali Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri. Ankara, Turkey: ASIL Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Kamal AHM, Kim KH, Shin KH, Choi JS, Baik BK, Tsujimoto H, Heo HY, Park CS, Woo SH (2010). Abiotic stress responsive proteins of wheat grain determined using proteomics technique. Aust J Crop Sci 4: 196-208.
  • Karagöz A, Zencirci N (2005). Variation in wheat (Triticum spp.) landraces from different altitudes of three regions of Turkey. GRES 52: 775-785.
  • Karagöz, A, Zencirci N, Tan A, Taşkın T, Köksel H, Sürek M, Toker C, Özbek K (2010). Conservation and use of plant genetic resources. Seventh Technical Congress of Agricultural Engineers Chamber 1: 11-15.
  • Karakullukçu E, Adak MS (2008). Salt tolerance of some chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars. MSc, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Khan MA, Ungar IA, Showalter AM (2000). Effects of salinity on growth, water relations and ion accumulation of the subtropical perennial halophyte, Atriplex griffithii var. stocksii. Plant Annal 31: 2763-2774.
  • Li C, Lv J, Zhao X, Ai X, Zhu X, Wang M, Zhao S, Xia G (2010). TaCHP: a wheat zinc finger protein gene down-regulated by abscisic acid and salinity stress plays a positive role in stress tolerance. Plant Physiol 154: 211-221.
  • Mahmoodzadeh H, Masoudi F K, Besharat H (2013). Impact of salt stress on seed germination indices of five wheat cultivars. Ann Bio Res 4: 93-96.
  • Masmoudi K, Brini F, Feki K, Hanin M, Khoudi H (2009). Enhancing drought and salinity tolerance in wheat crop grown in the Mediterranean region. Plant Cell 3: 446-449.
  • Mehrotra R, Bhalothia P, Bansal P, BasantaniMK, BhartiV, Mehrotra S (2014). Abscisic acid and abiotic stress tolerance – different tiers of regulation. J Plant Phys 171: 486-496.
  • Mostek A, Börner A, Badowiec A, Weidner S (2015). Alterations in root proteome of salt-sensitive and tolerant barley lines under salt stress conditions. J Plant Physiol 174: 166-176.
  • Moud A, Maghsoudi K (2008). Salt stress effects on respiration and growth of germinated seeds of different wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. World J Agric 4: 351-358.
  • Munns R, James R (2003). Screening methods for salinity tolerance: a case study with tetraploid wheat. Plant Soil 253: 201-218.
  • Munns R, James RA, Xu B, Athman A, Conn SJ, Jordans C, Byrt CS, Hare RA, Tyerman SD, Tester M et al. (2012). Wheat grain yield on saline soils is improved by an ancestral Na transporter gene. Nature Biotech 30: 360-364.
  • Murillo-Amador B, Lopez-Aguilar BR, Kaya C, Larrinaga-Mayoral J, Flores-Hernandez A (2002). Comparative effects of NaCl and polyethylene glycol on germination, emergence and seedling growth of cowpea. J Agro Crop Sci 188: 235-247.
  • Oyiga BC, Sharma RC, Shen J, Baum M, Ogbonnaya FC, Leon J, Ballvora A (2016). Identification and characterization of salt tolerance of wheat germplasm using a multivariable screening approach. J Agro Crop Sci doi: 10.1111/jac.12178.
  • Pierik R, Testerink C (2014). The art of being flexible: how to escape from shade, salt, and drought. Plant Physiol 166: 5-22.
  • Radi A (2013). Physiological and biochemical responses of salttolerant and salt-sensitive wheat and bean cultivars to salinity. J Bio 3: 72-88.
  • Rahaie M, Xue GP, Schenk PM (2013). The role of transcription factors in wheat under different abiotic stresses. Develop 2: 59.
  • Rahman M, Soomro, UA, Zahoor-ul-Haq, M, Gul S (2008). Effects of NACL salinity on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. World J Agric Sci 4: 398-403.
  • Richter JE, Kopka J, Zerb C (2015). Metabolic contribution to salt stress in two maize hybrids with contrasting resistance. Plant Sci 233: 107-115.
  • Sabir P, Ashraf M (2007). Screening of local accessions of Panicum miliaceum L. for salt tolerance at the seedling stage using biomass production and ion accumulation as selection criteria. Pak J Bot 39: 1655-1661.
  • Shahzad A, Iqbal M, Asif M, Hirani AH, Goyal A (2013). Growing wheat on saline lands: can a dream come true? Aust J Crop Sci 7: 515-524.
  • Shavrukov Y, Shamaya N, Baho M, Edwards J, Ramsey, C, Nevo E, Langridge P, Tester M (2011). Salinity tolerance and Na + exclusion in wheat: variability, genetics, mapping populations and QTL analysis. Czech J Gen Plant Bre 47: 85-93.
  • Shokohhifard G, Sakagam KH, Matsumoto S (1989). Effect of amending materials on growth of radish plant in salinized soil. J Plant Nut 12: 1195-1294.
  • Vardar Y, Çifci EA (2014). Salinity effects on germination stage of bread and durum wheat cultivars. J Yuzuncu Yıl Uni 24: 127- 139.
  • Verslues PE, Agarwal M, Katiyar-Agarwal S, Zhu J, Zhu JK (2006). Methods and concepts in quantifying resistance to drought, salt and freezing, abiotic stresses that affect plant water status. Plant J 45: 523-539.
  • Yurtseven E, Öztürk, H S, Avcı S (2014). Mass balance criteria in soil salinity management: different irrigation water qualities and leaching ratio. J Agric Sci 20: 113-120.
  • Zencirci N, Eser V, Baran I (1990). An Approach to Compare Some Stability Statistics. Ankara, Turkey: CRIFC (in Turkish).
  • Zencirci N, Karagöz A (2005). Effect of developmental stages length on yield and some quality traits of Turkish durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. convar. durum (Desf.) Mackey) landraces: influence of developmental stages length on yield and quality of durum wheat GRES 52: 765-774.
  • Zencirci N, Kün E (1995). Variation in landraces of durum wheat (T. turgidum L. conv. durum (Desf.) M.K.) from Turkey. Euphytica 92: 333-339.
  • Zobel RW, Wright MG, Gauch HG (1988). Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agro J 80: 388-393.