Bazı mürdümük (Lathyrus sativus L.) hatları üzerinde yapılan sitolojik araştırmalar

Cytological research on 5 grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) lines

This research was carried out to determine the cytological characteristics of 5 grass pea lines (numbers 452, 439, 455, 463 and 38) selected as being promising for the conditions of Tokat, from 13 lines originating from ICARDA. All of the lines studied had a chromosome number of 2n=14. It was determined that all chromosomes II and V of lines 439 and 455 carried 1 satellite on their short arms and chromosomes II and VI of the line 452 and the chromosomes II and IV of line 463 also had a satellite on their short arms. The satellites were longer than the short arms of the related chromosomes they were found on. It was observed that none of the chromosomes of line 38 carried any satellite.

PDF

___

1.Davis, P.H., Flora of Turkey and East-Aegean Islands. 3: 78,Edinburgh Univ. Press, 1970.
2.Smartt, J., Gene Pools in Grain Legumes. Economic Botany, 38 (1):24-35, 1984.
3.Kiehn, F.A., Reimer, M., Alternative Crops for the Prairies. ResearchStation, 30-32, Manitoba, 1992.
4.Campbell, C.G., Mehra, R.B., Agrawal, S.K., Chen, Y.Z., Abd El-Moneim, A.M., Khawaja, H.I.T., Yadov, C.R., Tay, J.U., Araya,W.A., Current Status and Future Strategy in Breeding Grasspea(Lathyrus sativusL.). Euphytica, 73: 167-175, 1994.
5.Gençkan, M.S., Yembitkileri Tar›m›. Ege Üniversitesi ZiraatFakültesi Yay›nlar› No: 467, 249-254, Bornova-‹zmir, 1992.
6.Zhao, CX., Lo, X., Yang, GF., Karyotype Analysis in Vicia amoenaand Lathyrus sativus L. Zhongguo-Caoyuan-Grassland ofChinab. No: 4, 47-50, 1984.
7.Kar, K., Sen, S, A., Comparative Karyological Study of Root andEmbryo Tissue of a Few Genera of Leguminosae. Cytologia 56:403-408, Tokyo, 1991.
8.Büyükburç, U., ‹ptafl, S., Y›lmaz, M., Tokat Ekolojik fiartlar›ndaYetifltirilen Baz› Mürdümük (Lathyrus sativusL.) Hatlar›n›n Verimve Adaptasyonu Üzerine Bir Araflt›rma. Türkiye III. Çay›r-Mer’a veYem Bitkileri Kongresi. 17-19 Haziran, 260- 266, Erzurum, 1996.
9.Sharma, P.C., Gupta, P.K., Karyotypes in Some Pulse Crops. TheNucleus, 25: 181- 185, 1982.
10. Hatipoğlu, R., Hesemann, C.U., Gland, A., Çukurova ÜniversitesiKampüsü ‹çindeki Do¤al Mer’alardan Toplanan Domuz Ayr›¤›(Dactylis glomerata) Populasyonunda Sitolojik Araflt›rmalar.Ç.Ü.Z.F. Dergisi, 7 (4): 141-156, 1992.
11. Karada¤, Y., Y›lmaz, G., Çemen (Trigonella foenum graecumL.)Bitkisinde Sitolojik Araflt›rmalar. GOÜ. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(1), 83-92, 1997.
12. Elçi, Ş., Sitogenetikte Araflt›rma Yöntemleri ve Gözlemler, 100. Y›lÜniversitesi Yay›n No: 18, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Yay›n No: 16,Van, 1994.
13. Karadağ, Y., Gülcan, H., Çukurova Bölgesi Do¤al VejetasyonundaBulunan Baz› Tek Y›ll›k Yonca Türlerinde (Medicago scutellata, M.orbicularis, M. polymorpha) Sitolojik Araflt›rmalar. Tr. J. of.Agriculture and Forestry, 21 (2), 121-127, 1997.
14. Krikorian, A.D., O’Connor, S.A., Fitter, M.S., Chromosome NumberVariation and Karyotype Stability in Cultures and Culture-derivedPlants. In: Handbook of Plant Cell Culture Vol. 1, Evans, D.A.,Sharp, W.P., Ammirato, P.V. and Yamada, Y. (Eds), PP: 541-581, McMillan Publishing Company, New York, 1983.
15 Levan, A., Fredga, K., Sandberg, A.A., Nomenclature forCentromeric Position on Chromosomes. Hereditas 52 (2), 201-220, 1964.
16. Rees, H., Hazarika, M.H., Chromosome Evolution in Lathyrus,Chromosome Today: 6, 158-165, 1969.
17. Löve, A., IOPB Chromosome Number Reports L x II. Taxon 27 (5/6):519-535, 1978.
18. Yamamoto K., Fujiwora, T, Blumenreich, D.I., Karyotype andMorphological Characteristics of Some Species in theLathyrusL.,Japan. J. Breed, 34, 273-284, 1984.
19. Kumar, U., Sinha, S.S.N., Karyotypic Analysis in Some Varieties ofLathyrus sativusL. Genetica Iberica. 41, 161-174. India, 1989.
20. Yunus, A.G. , Jackson, M.T., Plant Breeding. 106: 319-328, 1991.
21. Chandola, R.P., Jain, S.N., Karyomorphological Studies inPennisetum typhoidesL Caryologia 35: 181-196, 1970