Effects of Economic Partnership Agreements Between Ecowas and the EU on Trade, Revenue and Welfare of Agricultural Trade of Ecowas Bloc

Effects of Economic Partnership Agreements Between Ecowas and the EU on Trade, Revenue and Welfare of Agricultural Trade of Ecowas Bloc

This study examined the Effects of Economic Partnership Agreements between ECOWAS and the EU on Trade, Revenue and Welfare of Agricultural trade of ECOWAS bloc. The specific objectives of the study were to:(i) estimate the potential trade creation and diversion effects of EPA on agricultural trade of ECOWAS bloc, (ii) estimate the potential revenue effects of EPA on agricultural trade of ECOWAS bloc and (iii) estimate the potential welfare effects of EPA on agricultural trade of ECOWAS bloc. World Integrated Trade Solutions provided access to an online secondary data as classified by United Nations Harmonized system. The result on the potential trade creation and diversion effects of EPA on both trading blocs showed that ECOWAS will gain US$198.9million in trade creation and lose US$58.4 million in Trade Diversion. On the other hand, there will be no trade creation for EU with negligible trade diversion of – US$0.2million. The result showed total potential tariff revenue losses of US$366.4million for ECOWAS bloc post EPA. On the other hand, EU will lose (US$951.8million) its agricultural products post EPA. The result further showed potential welfare gain of US$27.6million for consumers of ECOWAS bloc. On the other hand, there will be welfare gain of the EU at US$243.5million for their consumers post EPA. Among all the recommendations, the study therefore points out that the on-going EPA negotiations between ECOWAS and the EU need not to be hurriedly signed by ECOWAS bloc. Also, ECOWAS needs to strengthen its agricultural production efficiency to be able to compete globally and encourage its individual countries to return to a single digit borrowing interest rate to encourage more investment by local agricultural producers if they want to enjoy the benefits of trade treaties at long run if EPA is eventually signed.

___

  • Brenton P, Ikezuki T. 2007. The Value of Trade Preferences for Africa’, in R. Newfarmer (ed), Trade, Doha and Development: A Window on the Issues, Washington DC: The World Bank.
  • Busse M, Bormann A, GroBmann H. 2004. The impact of ACP/EU Economic Partnership Agreements on ECOWAS Countries: An Empirical Analysis of the Trade and Budget Effects. Final Report, Hamburg Institute of International Economics, Hamburg, Germany
  • ECOWAS newsletter 2016. ECOWAS to sensitize Nigeria Media on International Trade Agreements, retrieved, 21th June, 2017
  • ECOWAS Statistical Bulletin 2012. A Publication of The Executive Secretariat, Jan-Feb. report 2012.
  • Eurostat, 2013. Tables, Graphs and Maps Interface (TGM) table Epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu Retrieved on June, 15th, 2017.
  • Harris H, Guanchen Q. 2015. The Economic Partnership Agreement between the EU and ECOWAS – A New Framework for Trade and Investment Veröffentlicht Am 11. Mai 2015 Von Gastautor.
  • Karingi S, Lang R, Oulmane N, Perez R, Sadni M. BenHammounda H. 2005. Economic and Welfare Impacts of the EU-Africa Economic Partnership Agreements Final Report Submitted to United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNICA) ECA/TRID/06/05.
  • Keane J, Cali M, Kennan, J. 2010. Impediments to intra-Regional Trade in sub-Sahara Africa. Overseas Development Institute Prepared for the Commonwealth Secretariat. Governments of the Member States meeting within the Council on Economic Partnership. Retrievedfrom http://www.thecommonwealth. org/shared_asp_files/uploadedfiles/54198A83-736D-4D36- B484-27400E267BCE_SATPaperforComsecComplete Jano6.pdf on June, 15th, 2017.
  • McKay A, Milner C. Morrissey O. 2005. Some Simple Analytics of the trade and welfare effects of Economic Partnership Agreements. Journal of African Economies, 14(3): 327-58
  • Milner C, Morrissey O. McKay A. 2005. Some Simple Analytics of the Trade and Welfare Effects of Economic Partnership Agreements, Journal of African Economies, Volume 14, Number 3, pp.327-358.
  • Morrissey O, Zgovu E. 2011. The impact of EPAs on ACP imports and welfare. In Morrissey, O. Assessing Prospective Trade Policy Reforms: The Case of Economic Partnership Agreements, Chapter 3. London: Rutledge, 60-82
  • Onogwu GO, Arene CJ. Chidebelu AN. 2011. An Analysis of Trend and Determinants of Intra-ECOWAS Trade in Agricultural Products Indian Journal of Economics and Business, Vol. 10, No. 4, Pp. 553-570.
  • United Nations International Trade Statistics 2018. Harmonized commodity Description and coding system (HS) retrieved on 26th June, 2018
  • Viner J. 1950. The customs union issue. New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Paace. Washington, DC: The World Bank.World Bank. World trade indicators 2008
  • Database. Accessed from http://info.worldbank.org/etools/ wti2008/3a.asp on October 10th, 2017
Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-127X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)