Correlation and Path Coefficient Analysis of Seed Yield and Yield Components of French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Genotypes in Sub-tropical Region

This research aims to determine the relationship between yield and yield components of French bean using multivariate statistical techniques. The study was conducted at Horticulture Research Station, Dailekh, Nepal for consecutive three year of 2016-2018. In this study, six French bean genotypes were used. The following measurements and observations were made: germination (%), pod length (cm), pod diameter (mm), individual pod weight and number of seeds pod-1 , number of dry pods plant-1, dry pod yield plant-1and dry pod yield (t/ha), 100 seed weight (g) and seed yield (t/ha). Highly significant and positive correlation was recorded between seed yield and individual pod weight (r= 0.659***), number of seed pod-1(r=0.548**) and pod length (0.459*). Conversely, pod diameter showed a negative and non-significant (-0.025) correlation on seed yield. Based on simple regression analysis, linear regression of individual pod weight, number of seed pod-1and pod length leads to an increase in the seed yield (t/ha) by 0.188, 0.285 and 0.103 units respectively. From the path coefficient analysis maximum positive direct effect on seed yield was recorded by number of seeds pod-1 (0.767) followed by 100 seed weight (0.530) and individual pod weight (0.429). Also, stepwise multiple linear regression analysis revealed that three traits individual pod weight, 100 seed weight and number of dry pod plant-1 account for 68.22% of the total variation in seed yield, while only 31.78% was explained by rest of the variables.Summarizing outcomes of four statistical methods showed that individual pod weight appeared to be the most effective contributor of seed yield followed by the number of seed pod-1, 100 seed weight, and pod length. Therefore, focus should be laid on these characters in future breeding program while selecting genotypes for sub-tropicsfor improving the seed yield.

___

Akhshi N, Firouzabadi F, Cheghamirza K, Dorri H. 2015. Coefficient Analysis and Association between Morpho- Agronomical Characters in Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Cercetari AgronomiceIn Moldova, 48(4):29-37, doi: 10.1515/cerce-2015-0050

Alemu Y, Alamirew S, Dessalegn L. 2017. Correlation and Path Analysis for Green Pod Yield and Its Components in Snap Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) Genotypes. International Journal of Research in Agriculture and Forestry, 4(1): 30-36

Ambachew D, Mekbib F, Asfaw A, Beebe S, Blair M. 2015. Trait associations in common bean genotypes grown under drought stress and field infestation by BSM bean fly. The Crop Journal, 3(4): 305-316, doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2015.01.006

Cokkizgin A, Colkesen M, Idikut L, Ozsisli B, Girgel U. 2013. Determination of relationships between yield components in bean by using path coefficient. Greener Journal of AgriSciences, 3 (2): 085-089.

Doust J, Doust L, Eaton G. 1983. Sequential Yield Component Analysis and Models of Growth in Bush Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). American Journal of Botany, 70(7): p.1063. doi: 10.2307/2442816

Ejara E, Mohammed W, Amsalu B. 2017. Correlations and path coefficient analyses of yield and yield related traits in common bean accessions (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) at Abaya and Yabello, Southern Ethiopia. International Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science, 4 (2): 215-224.

FAO.2017. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC

Ghobary HMM, Abd-Allah SAM. 2010. Correlation and path coefficient studies in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Plant Production, 1(9): 21233-1239.

Gonçalves D, Barelli M, Oliveira T, Santos P, Silva C, Poletine J, Neves L. 2017. Genetic correlation and path analysis of common bean collected from Caceres Mato Grosso State, Brazil. Ciência Rural, 47(8), doi: 10.1590/0103- 8478cr20160815

Gonçalves M, Correa A, Destro D, Souza L, Alves Sobrinho T. 2003. Correlations and path analysis of common bean grain yield and its primary components. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 3(3): 217-222, doi:10.12702/1984- 7033.v03n03a06

Kamaluddin, Ahmed S. 2011. Variability, correlation and path analysis for seed yield and yield related traits in common beans. Indian J. Hort. 68(1): 50-60.

Karasu A, Oz M. 2010. A study on coefficient analysis and association between agronomical characters in dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 16(2): 203-211.

Neupane RK, Shrestha R,Vaidya ML, Bhattarai EM, Darai R. 2008. Agromorphological diversity in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces of Jumla, Nepal, in: M.C. Kharkwal, (ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Food Legumes Research Conference, New Delhi, India, pp. 639–648.

Nimbalkar CA, Baviskar AP, Desai UT. 2002. Selection strategy for yield improvement in rajmash (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 62 (4): 349-351.

Ojha R, Sarkar A, Aryal A, Rahul K.C., Poudel M.R., Pant KR, Shrestha J. 2018. Correlation and path coefficient analysis of wheat (Triticumaestivum L.) genotypes. Farming & Management, 3(2). doi: 10.31830/2456-8724.2018.0002.19.

Onder M, Ozkaynak I. 1994. The effects of inoculation and nitrogen applications on the grain yield and some characteristics of dwarf dry bean varieties. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 18: 463-471.

Panchbhaiya A, Singh DK, Jain SK. 2017. Inter-characters association studies for morphological, yield and yield attributes in the germplasm of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Tarai region of Uttarakhand, India. Legume Research-An International Journal, 40(1): 196-199.

Raffi SA, Nath UK. 2004. Variability, heritability, genetic advance and relationships of yield and yield contributing characters in dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Biological Sciences, 4: 157- 159.

Razvi M, Khan M, Bhat M, Ahmad M, Ganaie S, Sheikh F, et al. 2018. Morphological variability and phylogenetic analysis in Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Legume Research an International Journal, (00), doi: 10.18805/lr-3421

Sadeghi A, Cheghamirza K, Dorri HR. 2011. The study of morphoagronomic traits relationship in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Biharean Biologist 5(2): 102-108.

Salehi M, Faramarzi A, Mohebalipour N. 2010. Evaluation of different effective traits on seed yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) with path analysis. American- Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, 9(1): 52-54.

ShahidA, Kamaluddin. 2013. Correlation and path analysis for agro-morphological traits in rajmash beans under Baramulla- Kashmir region. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8(18): 2027-2032. doi: 10.5897/ajar2012.0014

Singh A, Singh DK. 2013. Genetic variability and character association analysis in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Food Legumes, 26 (3&4): 130-133.

Steel R, Torrie J, Dickey DA. 1997. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 3rd ed. McGraw Hill Book Co. New York.

Tiwari JK, Singh AK. 2019. Principal component analysis for yield and yield traits in faba bean (ViciafabaL.). Journal of Food Legumes 32(1) :13-15.

Yorgancilar O, Kenar D, Şehirali S. 2003. The effect of nitrogen doses on yield and yield components of Bush bean varieties. Fifth Field Crops Congress (13-17 October, 2003), Diyarbakir, Turkey, 555-559.
Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-127X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

In Turkey, The Relationship of Agricultural Sector and Economic Variables: Panel Cointegration Analysis

Ayşe Esra PEKER

Investigation of Grain Characters of Some Bean Varietiesin Eastern Anatolian Conditions

Leyla İDİKUT, Tolga KARABACAK

Proximate Composition of Freshwater Mussels (Unio Pictorum, Linnaeus 1758) in Karasustream, Sinop

Mehmet Anıl KESKİNBALTA, Meryem Yeşim ÇELİK

Evaluation of Plant Protection Practices of Garlic Growers in Gaziantep Province

AYDIN ATAKAN, Oktay ERDOĞAN, Hülya ÖZGÖNEN ÖZKAYA

Coğrafi İşaretli Iğdır Kayısısı’nda (Prunus armeniaca cv. Şalak) Çeşitli DNA Barkod Bölgelerinin İncelenmesi

Kaan HÜRKAN

Transglutaminaz Enziminin Deve Sütünden Üretilen Yoğurdun Bazı Özellikleri Üzerine Etkisi

Selda BULCA, Fahriye ÜNLÜ, Atakan KOÇ

The Effect of Organic Liquid Fertilizer Given in Different Periods on Grain Yield, Yield Components and Quality in Durum Wheat (Triticum durum L.)

Arzu MUTLU, Timuçin TAŞ, Ali Beyhan UÇAK

Economic Performance of Rainbow Trout Farming in Turkey

MEHMET AYDOĞAN, Osman UYSAL, Serhan CANDEMİR, Yunus Emre TERZİ, Rahmi TAŞCI, Tuba BEŞEN, Fatma Pınar ÖZTÜRK, Meltem EMRE, Önder ERALP, ORHAN GÜNDÜZ, Vedat CEYHAN

Effect of Dung Cake Biochar and NP Fertilizers on Growth and Yield of Carrot (Daucus carota L.) and Selected Soil Physico-Chemical Properties

Kenzemed KASSİE, Kibebew KİBRET, Tadele AMARE

The Influence of Microfiltration on Raw Milk Quality

Ceren AKAL, BİRCE TABAN