Gulsum YILMAZ, Rezzan DEMIRCI, Gokhan ACAR, Buket KAYAOGLU

The study of the effect of the individual perception of justice (belief in a just world) on degree of decisionmaking of students of the faculty of physical education and sport sciences

This study aims to reveal the research results of the effects of the relation between individual perception of justice (belief in a just world) and decision-making on the students of faculty of physical education and sport sciences. In this context, what is the degree of individual perception of just world of the students? What is the degree of the students self-esteem? What are students decision making styles? Does students individual perception of justice, degree of self-esteem at decision-making and decision-making styles show difference in terms of their demographic features? Is there a significant relationship between students individual perception of just world, and their self-esteem at decision-making and decision-making styles? These are the questions that are investigated. In order to determine between students individual perception of a just world and decisionmaking styles, arithmetic mean and standard deviation values are examined. T test and one-way ANOVAs test are applied to determine whether students individual perception of a just world and decision-making styles change according to their demographic features. The mean of the answers to the questions about students individual perception of just world is calculated as 3.73. Students individual perception of a just world is quite close to 4 (neutral value). According to this, it seems that students individual perception of a just world is at the degree of indecision. The value of the mean of the first six items that the students degree of self-esteem is determined is 2.52 which is the degree of accurate. According to that, we can say that students degree of self-esteem at decision-making is high. The mean of the answers that the students gave to the questions about decision-making delay is 1.91 which is at the degree of sometimes accurate. According to that, we can say that students sometimes delay their decision-making process. When we compare students individual perception of just world, and their self-esteem at decision-making and decision-making styles in terms of their demographic features, it is seen that there is not a significant difference between the groups according to variables of gender, the grade they are in, their department they study and the dwelling place. It is seen that there is a significant difference only according to the variables of degree of doing sports and the habitual residence

PDF

___

1. Avşaroğlu S, Üre O. Üniversite Oğrencilerinin Karar Vermede Özsaygı. Karar Verme ve Stresle Basacıkma Stillerinin Benlik Saygısı ve Bazı Degişkenler Açısından Incelenmesi. Selçuk University J Institute of Social Sciences, 2007; 18: 85100.
2. Bağırkan Ş. Karar Verme. İstanbul: Der Yayınları.1983.
3. Borg WR. Educational Research New York: David McKay Co. Catherine Soanes. Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. 2007. New Delhi. P. 22, 1985.
4. Brown EJ, Mann L. The relationship between family structure and process variables and adolescent decision-making. Journal of Adolescence, 1991; 13: 2537.
5. Can H. Organizasyon ve Yönetim (7. Baskı). Siyasal Kitabevi, Ankara, 2005.
6. Carney C, Wells C. Discover the Career Within You. New York. Cole Publishing Company, 1995.
7. Çolakkadıoğlu O. Ergenlerde Karar Verme Ölçeğinin (Adolescent Decision Making Questionnaire) uyarlama çalışması. Master Thesis, Çukurova University, Adana, 2003.
8. Dalbert C. The world is more just for me than generally: About the personal belief in a just world scales validity. Social Justice Research, 1999; 12: 7998.
9. Deniz ME. Investigation of the relation between decision making self- esteem. Decision making style and problem solving skills of university students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2004; 15: 2335.
10. Furnham A, Proctor E. Belief in the just world: review and critique of the individual differences literature. British Journal of Social Psychology, 1989; 28: 365-384.
11. Güçray SS. Bazı Kişisel Değişkenler Algılanan Sosyal Destek ve Atılganlıgın Karar Verme Stilleri İle İliskisi. Psikolojik Danısma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 1998; 2(9): 716.
12. Goldberg JH, Lerner JS, Tetlock PE. Rage and reason: The psychology of the intuitive prosecutor. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1999; 29: 781795.
13. Göregenli M. Siddet, kotu muamele ve iskenceye iliskin degerlendirmeler, tutumlar ve deneyimler. Iskencenin Onlenmesinde Hukukcuların Rolu Projesi Raporu. Izmir, 2003.
14. Hafer CL, Bègue L. Experimental research on just-world theory: Problems. developments. and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 2005; 131: 128167.
15. Koçel T. İşletme Yöneticiliği. İstanbul, Beta Basım, 2001. 16. Kuzgun Y. Karar stratejileri ölçeği: geliştirilmesi ve standardizasyonu. VII. Ulusal Psikoloji Kongresi Bilimsel Çalışmaları. 161170. Ankara, 1992.
17. Lerner MJ. The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion. New York: Plenum Press, 1980.
18. Lerner MJ. Pursuing the justice motive. M. Ross and Date T. Miller Eds. In: The justice motive in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University, Press, 2002.
19. Lipkus IM, Siegler IC. The belief in a just world and perceptions and discrimination. J of Psychology, 1993; 127: 465474.
20. Mann L, Radford M, Burnett P, Ford S, Bond M, Leung K, Nakamura H, Vaughan G, Yang KS. Cross-Cultural Differences in Self-Reported Decision- Making Style and Confidence. International Journal of Psychology, 1998; 33: 325335.
21. Mitchell LK, Krumboltz YD. Research on human decision making: Implications for career decision making and counseling. In R. W. Lent. & S. D. Brown (Eds). Handbook of Counseling Psychology. A Wiley- Interscience Publication, USA, 1984.
22. Otto K, Dalbert C. Belief in a Just world and its function for young prisoners. Journal of Research in Personality, 2005; 39: 559573.
23. Pepitone A, L‟Armand, K. The justice and injustice of life events. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26. 581 597.1996.
24. Sinangil K.H. Yonetici Adaylarında Karar Verme İle Kaygı İliskileri. VII. Ulusal Psikoloji Kongresi Bilimsel Çalışmaları. Ankara: Turk Psikologlar Dernegi Yayınları, 1993.
25. Tasdelen A. Öğretmen Adaylarının Farklı Psiko Sosyal Değiskenlere Göre Karar Verme Stilleri. Doctoral Thesis, Institute of Education Sciences, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, 2002.