A Scrutiny on the Burnout Levels of Fencing Referees

A Scrutiny on the Burnout Levels of Fencing Referees

The objective of this study is to measure and interpret the burnout levels of the fencing referees who act in the fencing contests in our country as referees actively. The study group is constituted by the 60 referees with varying refereeing levels taking place on the Certified Referees List 2018 of the Turkish fencing Federation. The Maslach Burnout Inventory developed by Maslach and Jackson (10) and adapted into Turkish conducting a study on its reliability and validity by Ergin (6) was used in this study conducted on the basis of the survey model. In the evaluation of the data and determination of the calculated values, SPSS 16.0 statistics package program was used. The data was summarized by providing the percentages, averages, and standard deviations. As the data distributed normally, an independent group t test was used for the pairwise cluster comparisons and One way Variance Analysis (ANOVA) was used for the multiple cluster comparisons. Tukey HSD multiple comparison test was conducted to determine the significant differences as a result of the ANOVA. The scale reliability coefficient was calculated as .82 and significance level was taken into account as 0.05 in this study. In conclusion, it was observed that the variables of ages, income and education statuses, sportsperson ship background, and material revenues obtained from acting as referees did not differentiate statistically and statistically significant differences were determined in terms of the variables of refereeing experience period, refereeing level, and the number of the annually received assignments, in the personal success subcategory.

___

  • 1.Al-Halıq M, Altahayneh ZL, Oudat M. Levels of burnoutamong sports referees in Jordan. Journal of PhysicalEducation and Sport, 2014:14(8):47-51.
  • 2.Brandão MRF, Serpa S, Weinberg R. Psychometric propertiesof the burnout ınventory for referees. Motriz Rio Claro, 2014:20(4): 374-383.
  • 3.Da Gama DRN, Nunes RDAM, Guımarães GL, E Sılva LDL, De Castro JBT, Vale RGDS. Analysis of the burnout levels of soccer referees working at amateur and professional leagues of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Journal of Physical Education andSport (JPES),2018;2(174):1168-1174.
  • 4.Dağlı Ekmekçi YA, Işık İnan Ö, Dikmen Çoban FN. Therelationship between burnout and organizational commitment: an examination on swimming referees, JournalOf Busıness Research-Turk, 2020;12(2):1159-1175.
  • 5.Diotaiuti P, Falese L, Mancone S, Purromuto F. A structuralmodel of self-efficacy in handball referees. Frontiers inPsychology, 2017;8(811):1.
  • 6.Ergin C. Burnout in physicians and nurses and adaptation ofthe maslach burnout scale. VII. Scientific Studies of theNational Psychology Congress, 1992.
  • 7.Ilkım YT, Güllü M. Investigation of the job satisfaction and burnout levels of the wrestling referees according to various factorsin Turkey. Journal of Human Sciences, 2016;13(2):3469-3481.
  • 8.Kaçmaz N. Burnout syndrome, Journal of İstanbul Faculty ofMedicine, 2005; 68(1): 29-32.
  • 9.Kargün M, Albay F, Cenikli A, Güllü M. Investigation ofwork satisfaction and fatigue levels of turkish football referees. Ondokuz Mayıs University Journal Of Sports AndPerformance Researches, 2012;3(2):30-38.
  • 10.Maslach C, Jackson SE. The measurement of experiencedburnout. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 1981; 2: 99-113.
  • 11.Maslach C, Leiter PM. The truth about burnout. SanFrancisco, Published by Jossey-Bass, 1997:18.
  • 12.Rainey DW, Hrady L. Sources of stress, burnout and intentionto terminate among rugby union referees. Journal of SportsSciences, 1999: 17(10): 797-806.
  • 13.Roi GS, Bianchedi D, The science of fencing. Sports Med,2008; 38(6):465-481
  • 14.Yıldırım A, Uluöz E, Dinç ZF, Abakay U. Investıgatıon ofoccupatıonal burnout and job satısfactıon levels of hockeyreferees in terms of varıous varıables. Inonu University,Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences (IUJPESS), 2018; 5(2):67-85.