Fetüs Dışı Değerlendirme: Plasenta, Umbilikal Kord, Amniyon, Serviks


[1]. Barak S, Leibovitz Z, Degani S, Shapiro I, Kugelman A, Gonen R, et al. Extensive hemorrhagic chorion-amnion separation after second trimester amniocentesis. J Ultrasound Med 2003; 22: 1283-8. [CrossRef]

[2]. Callen PW. Ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2008.

[3]. Ezzedine D, Norwitz ER. Are Women With Uterine Fibroids at Increased Risk for Adverse Pregnancy Outcome? Clin Obstet Gynecol 2016; 59: 119-27. [CrossRef]

[4]. Elsayes KM, Trout AT, Friedkin AM, Liu PS, Bude RO, Platt JF, et al. Imaging of the placenta: a multi modality pictorial review. Radiographics 2009; 29: 1371-91. [CrossRef]

[5]. Hoddick WK, Mahony BS, Callen PW, Filly RA. Placental thickness. J Ultrasound Med 1985; 4: 479-82. [CrossRef]

[6]. Dombrowski MP, Wolfe HM, Saleh A, Evans MI, O’Brien J. The sonographically thick placenta: a predictor of increased perinatal morbidity and mortality. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1992; 2: 252-5. [CrossRef]

[7]. Elchalal U, Ezra Y, Levi Y, Bar-Oz B, Yanai N, Intrator O, et al. Sonographically thick placenta: a marker for increased perinatal risk-a prospective cross-sectional study. Placenta 2000; 21: 268-72. [CrossRef]

[8]. Harris RD, Wells WA, Black WC, Chertoff JD, Poplack SP, Sargent SK, et al. Accuracy of prenatal sonography for detecting circumvallate placenta. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168: 1603-8. [CrossRef]

[9]. Grannum PA, Berkowitz RL, Hobbins JC. The ultrasonic changes in the maturing placenta and their relation to fetal pulmonic maturity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 133: 915-22. [CrossRef]

[10]. Hills D, Irwin GA, Tuck S, Baim R. Distribution of placental grade in high-risk gravidas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984; 143: 1011-3. [CrossRef]

[11]. Hill LM, Breckle R, Ragozzino MW, Wolfgram KR, O’Brien PC. Grade 3 placentation: incidence and neonatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 61: 728-32.

[12]. Vosmar MB, Jongsma HW, van Dongen PW. The value of ultrasonic placental grading: no correlation with intrauterine growth retardation or with maternal smoking. J Perinat Med 1989; 17: 137-43. [CrossRef]

[13]. Yin TT, Loughna P, Ong SS, Padfield J, Mayhew TM. No correlation between ultrasound placenta grading at 31-34 weeks of gestation and a surrogate estimate of organ function at term obtained by stereological analysis. Placenta 2009; 30: 726-30. [CrossRef]

[14]. McKenna D, Tharmaratnam S, Mahsud S, Dornan J. Ultrasonic evidence of placental calcification at 36 weeks’ gestation: maternal and fetal outcomes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005; 84: 7-10. [CrossRef]

[15]. Chen KH, Chen LR, Lee YH. Exploring the relationship between preterm placental calcification and adverse maternal and fetal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37: 328-34. [CrossRef]

[16]. Fox H. General pathology of the placenta. In: Fox H, ed. Obstetrical and gynaecological pathology. 3rd ed. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone, 1987; 978-9.

[17]. Jauniaux E, Ramsay B, Campbell S. Ultrasonographic investigation of placental morphologic characteristics and size during the second trimester of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170: 130-7. [CrossRef]

[18]. Thompson MO, Vines SK, Aquilina J, Wathen NC, Harrington K. Are placental lakes of any clinical significance? Placenta 2002; 23: 685-90. [CrossRef]

[19]. Morikawa M, Cho K, Kataoka S, Kato EH, Yamada T, Yamada H, et al. Magnetic resonance image findings of placental lake: report of two cases. Prenat Diagn 2005; 25: 250-2. [CrossRef]

[20]. Muramatsu K, Itoh H, Yamasaki T, Nakamura Y, Kobayashi Y, Hirai K, et al. A case of a huge placental lake; prenatal differential diagnosis and clinical management. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2010; 36: 165-9. [CrossRef]

[21]. Harris RD, Simpson WA, Pet LR, Marin-Padilla M, Crow HC. Placental hypoechoic-anechoic areas and infarction: sonographic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1990; 176: 75-80. [CrossRef]

[22]. Jauniaux E, Moscoso G, Campbell S, Gibb D, Driver M, Nicolaides KH. Correlation of ultrasound and pathologic findings of placental anomalies in pregnancies with elevated maternal serum alphafetoprotein. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1990; 37: 219-30. [CrossRef]

[23]. Chama CM, Wanonyi IK, Usman JD. From low-lying implantation to placenta praevia: a longitudinal ultrasonic assessment. J Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 24: 516-8. [CrossRef]

[24]. Edlestone DI. Placental localization by ultrasound. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1977; 20: 285-96. [CrossRef]

[25]. King DL. Placental ultrasonography. JCU 1973; 1: 21-6. [CrossRef]

[26]. Townsend RR, Laing FC, Nyberg DA, Jeffrey RB, Wing VW. Technical factors responsible for placental migration: sonographic assessment. Radiology 1986; 160: 105-8. [CrossRef]

[27]. Lauria MR, Smith RS, Treadwell MC, Comstock CH, Kirk JS, Lee W, et al. The use of second-trimester transvaginal sonography to predict placenta previa. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 8: 337-40. [CrossRef]

[28]. Timor-Tritsch IE, Yunis RA. Confirming the safety of transvaginal sonography in patients suspected of placenta previa. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81: 742-4.

[29]. Oppenheimer L. Diagnosis and management of placenta previa. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2007; 29: 261- 73. [CrossRef]

[30]. Wu S, Kocherginsky M, Hibbard JU. Abnormal placentation: twenty-year analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 1458-61. [CrossRef]

[31]. Berkley EM, Abuhamad AZ. Prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta: is sonography all we need? J Ultrasound Med 2013; 32: 1345-50. [CrossRef]

[32]. Buetow MP. Sonography of placenta percreta during the first trimester. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179: 535. [CrossRef]

[33]. Comstock CH, Love JJ, Bronsteen RA, Lee W, Vettraino IM, Huang RR, et al. Sonographic detection of placenta accreta in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 1135- 40. [CrossRef]

[34]. Glantz C, Purnell L. Clinical utility of sonography in the diagnosis and treatment of placental abruption. J Ultrasound Med 2002; 21: 837-40. [CrossRef]

[35]. Sepulveda W, Aviles G, Carstens E, Corral E, Perez N. Placental chorioangioma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 597-8. [CrossRef]

[36]. Khong TY, George K. Chromosomal abnormalities associated with a single umblical artery. Prenat Diagn 1992; 12: 965-8. [CrossRef]

[37]. Predanic M, Perni SC, Chasen ST, Baergen RN, Chervenak FA. Ultrasound evaluation of abnormal umblical cord coiling in second trimester of gestation in association with adverse pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 387-94. [CrossRef]

[38]. de Laat MW, Franx A, Bots ML, Visser GH, Nikkels PG. Umbilical coiling index in normal and complicated pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 1049- 55. [CrossRef]

[39]. Sebire NJ. Pathophysiological significance of abnormal umbilical cord coiling index. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30: 804-6. [CrossRef]

[40]. Zangen R, Yaffe H. Umbilical cord cyst-should it concern us? Harefuah 2009; 148: 436-40.

[41]. Sandlin AT, Ounpraseuth ST, Spencer HJ, Sick CL, Lang PM, Magann EF. AFV in normal singleton pregnancies: modeling with quantile regression. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014; 289: 967-72. [CrossRef]

[42]. van Zijl MD, Koullali B, Mol BW, Pajkrt E, Oudijk MA. Prevention of preterm delivery: current challenges and future prospects. Int J Womens Health 2016; 8: 633-45. [CrossRef]

[43]. Berghella V, Baxter JK, Hendrix NW. Cervical assessment by ultrasound for preventing preterm delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 1: CD007235 [CrossRef]

[44]. Whittle WL, Fong KF, Windrim R. Cervical ultrasound and preterm birth. In: Rumack CM, Wilson SR, Charboneau JW, Levine D, editors. Diagnostic Ultrasound. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2011.p.1527-42.

[45]. Crane JM, Hutchens D. Tranvaginal sonografik measurement of cervical length to predict preterm birth in asymptomatic women at increased risk: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31: 579-87. [CrossRef]

[46]. Berghella V, Palacio M, Ness A, Alfrevic Z, Nicholaides KH, Saccone G. Cervical length screening for prevention of preterm birth in singleton pregnancy with threatened preterm labor: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomize controlled trials using individual patient-level data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 49: 322-9. [CrossRef]

[47]. Hernandez-Andrade E, Romero R, Ahn H, Hussein Y, Yeo L, Korzeniewski SJ, et al. Transabdominal evaluation of uterine cervical length during pregnancy fails to identify a substantial number of women with a short cervix. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25: 1682-9. [CrossRef]

[48]. Bohiltea RE, Munteanu O, Turcan N, Baros A, Bodean O, Voicu D, et al. A debate about ultrasound and anatomic aspects of the cervix in spontaneous preterm birth. J Med Life 2016; 9: 342-7.

[49]. Larma JD, Iams JD. Is Sonographic Assessment of the Cervix Necessary and Helpful? Clin Obstet Gynecol 2012; 55: 324-35. [CrossRef]

Kaynak Göster