Impacts of Radiotherapy Fractionation on Outcome in Squamous Cell Head and Neck Cancer (SQC HNC)

Impacts of Radiotherapy Fractionation on Outcome in Squamous Cell Head and Neck Cancer (SQC HNC)

Although conventional fractionated (CF) radiotherapy (RT) became the most common non-surgicalapproach delivering 66-70 Gy in 33-35 daily fractions (fx) in 6.5-7 weeks several decades ago due to agood local control (LC) with low normal tissue complication rates, recent decades also brought alteredfractionated RT regimens based on better understanding of radiobiology. Of these, split course RT islargely abandoned due to inferior results caused by the treatment gap, which led to inferior local controlrates and consequently survival. Hyperfractionated (Hfx) RT and various forms of accelerated (Acc) RThad consistently shown improvement in the treatment outcome, given either alone or with concurrentchemotherapy (CHT). Hfx RT was most consistently superior to CF and frequently to Acc RT, whilemoderate Acc RT also holds promise to be used more often in daily clinical practice. The use of HfxRT may face the challenge of applicability in busy radiotherapy departments around the world despiteunequivocally having been proven as superior regarding both local/regional tumor control and overallsurvival. With concurrent CHT, although results favor it, risks of accompanying toxicity rise and shouldbe considered when planning such intensified treatment approach.

___

  • 1. Pulte D, Brenner H. Changes in survival in head and neck cancers in the late 20th and early 21st century: a period analysis. Oncologist 2010;15(9):994–1001.
  • 2. Overgaard J, Hjelm-Hansen M, Johansen LV, Andersen AP. Comparison of conventional and split-course radiotherapy as primary treatment in carcinoma of the larynx. Acta Oncol 1988;27(2):147–52.
  • 3. Parsons JT, Bova FJ, Million RR. A re-evaluation of split-course technique for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1980;6(12):1645–52.
  • 4. Thames HD Jr, Withers HR, Peters LJ, Fletcher GH. Changes in early and late radiation responses with altered dose fractionation: implications for dosesurvival relationships. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1982;8(2):219–26.
  • 5. Peters LJ, Ang KK, Thames HD Jr. Accelerated fractionation in the radiation treatment of head and neck cancer. A critical comparison of different strategies. Acta Oncol 1988;27(2):185–94.
  • 6. Bourhis J, Overgaard J, Audry H, Ang KK, Saunders M, Bernier J, et al. Hyperfractionated or accelerated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2006;368(9538):843–54.
  • 7. Pignon JP, le Maître A, Maillard E, Bourhis J; MACHNC Collaborative Group. Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): an update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patients. Radiother Oncol 2009;92(1):4–14.
  • 8. Lacas B, Bourhis J, Overgaard J, Zhang Q, Grégoire V, Nankivell M, et al. Role of radiotherapy fractionation in head and neck cancers (MARCH): an updated meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2017;18(9):1221–37.
  • 9. Pignon JP, Bourhis J, Domenge C, Designé L. Chemotherapy added to locoregional treatment for head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma: three meta-analyses of updated individual data. MACH-NC Collaborative Group. Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy on Head and Neck Cancer. Lancet 2000;355(9208):949–55.
  • 10. Blanchard P, Hill C, Guihenneuc-Jouyaux C, Baey C, Bourhis J, Pignon JP, et al. Mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis of altered fractionated radiotherapy and chemotherapy in head and neck cancer. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Sep;64(9):985–92.
  • 11. Gupta T, Kannan S, Ghosh-Laskar S, Agarwal JP. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy versus altered fractionation radiotherapy in the radiotherapeutic management of locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: An adjusted indirect comparison meta-analysis. Head Neck 2015;37(5):670–6.
  • 12. Liu Y, Kou C, Bai W, Liu X, Song Y, Zhang L, et al. Altered fractionation radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer: a network meta-analysis. Onco Targets Ther 2018;11:5465–83.
  • 13. Gupta T, Kannan S, Ghosh-Laskar S, Agarwal JP. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Conventionally Fractionated Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy versus Altered Fractionation Radiotherapy Alone in the Definitive Management of Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2016;28(1):50–61.
  • 14. Jeremic B, Milicic B, Dagovic A, Vaskovic Z, Tadic L. Radiation therapy with or without concurrent lowdose daily chemotherapy in locally advanced, nonmetastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol 2004;22(17):3540–8.
  • 15. Jeremic B, Shibamoto Y, Milicic B, Nikolic N, Dagovic A, Aleksandrovic J, et al. Hyperfractionated radiation therapy with or without concurrent low-dose daily cisplatin in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a prospective randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 2000;18(7):1458–64.
  • 16. Szturz P, Wouters K, Kiyota N, Tahara M, Prabhash K, Noronha V, et al. Altered fractionation radiotherapy combined with concurrent low-dose or high-dose cisplatin in head and neck cancer: A systematic review of literature and meta-analysis. Oral Oncol 2018;76:52– 60.
  • 17. Jeremic B, Dubinsky P, Filipobic N, Özyiğit G. Optimal administration frequency of cisplatin concurrently with radical radiotherapy in the definitive treatment of locally advanced inoperable squamous cell cancer of the head and neck. Still obscured by clouds? Turk J Oncol 2019;34(2):133–6.
  • 18. Jeremic B, Özyiğit G, Dubinsky P, Filipovic N. Importance of Hpv Positivity in Squamous Cell Head and Neck Cancer. Turk J Oncol 2019;34(3):204–14.
Türk Onkoloji Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-7467
  • Başlangıç: 2015
  • Yayıncı: Ali Cangül
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

A Dosimetric Plan Study to Increase the Dose from 63 Gy to 70 Gy in Early-Stage Glottic Larynx Cancer

Murat OKUTAN, Burak ŞENGÜL, Canan KÖKSAL, Evren Ozan GÖKSEL, Kübra ÖZKAYA TORAMAN, Musa ALTUN, Bayram DEMİR

A Different Approach to Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Patient QA Measurements about Dosimetric Equipment

Rıdvan ÜNAL, Aysun İNAL, İsmail Hakkı SARPÜN

A Rare Primary Lung Tumor: Pulmonary Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma and a Literature Review

Ömer ÖZBUDAK, İrem Hicran ÖZBUDAK, Hülya DİROL

Oligometastatic Recurrent Ovarian Cancer Treated Using Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

Satya NARAYAN, Puneet PAREEK, Tej Prakash SONI, Sweta SONI, Puneet BAGRI

Uveal Melanoma with Thickness between 4 and 6 mm Treated with two Different Radioisotopes (I125 or Ru106): Single Institution Experience

Jacopo LENKOWICZ, Luca TAGLIAFERRI, Monica Maria PAGLIARA, Bruno FIONDA, Andrea SCUPOLA, Luca BOLDRINI, Carmela Grazia CAPUTO, Valentina LANCELLOTTA, Cesare MARINO, Giulia MIDENA, Luigi AZARIO, Maria Antonietta GAMBACORTA, Vincenzo VALENTINI, Maria Antonietta BLASI

Cochlear Sparing for Brain Tumor Radiotherapy: A Retrospective Study Comparing Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy

Elif Eda ÖZER, Gülşen Pınar SOYDEMİR GÖÇER

Down-Regulation of Death Receptor-5 in Metastatic Cascade of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Mohammad Kamalabadi FARAHANI

Examining the Compassion Status of Healthcare Professionals Working in the Palliative Care Units

Dilek YILDIRIM, Vildan KOCATEPE, Özlem ORUÇ, Merve HÖRMET İĞDE

The Thing we should not Forget in Brachytherapy: Inverse Square Law

Alaattin ÖZEN, Görkem TÜRKKAN

Lung Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Single-Center Experience

Alaattin ÖZEN, Güntülü AK, Melek AKÇAY, Durmuş ETİZ, Muzaffer METİNTAŞ, Şenay YILMAZ