Bulent UNAL, Turgut PİSKİN, Sezai YİLMAZ

Böbrek Nakline Başlarken Açık Donör Nefrektomi Güvenli Bir Yaklaşımdır

Amaç: Türkiye'de canlı vericili böbrek nakli, organ bağışının azlığı nedeni ile oldukça önemlidir. Klasik retroperitoneal açık donör nefrektomi, intraperitoneal organ yaralanması ve postoperataif adezyonları önlemesi bakımından faydalı bir yöntemdir. Biz de kliniğimizde açık donör nefrektomi geçiren hastalarda başlangıç deneyimlerimizi sunmayı amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Kasım 2010 ve Haziran 2011 tarihleri arasında açık donör nefrektomi yapılan 14 hasta retrospektif olarak analiz edildi. Bu donörlerde demografik özellikler, intraoperatif ve postoperative komplikasyonlar, hastanede kalış süresi, serum kreatinin seviyeleri ( taburculuk zamanında, postoperative maksimum seviyeleri ve şimdiki değerleri) gözden geçirildi. Bulgular: Bu dönemde 14 donör opere edildi. Erkek kadın oranı 8:6 idi. Ortalama yaş 43.57yıl ( 27y-68y), ortalama vücut kitle indeksi 27.71 kg/m2 ( 21.3-36.1 kg/m2) idi. Beş sağ böbrek, 9 sol böbrek nefrektomi yapıldı. İntraoperatif organ yaralanması gözlenmedi. Tüm greftler hemen çalışmaya başladı. Transplante edilen böbreklerde vasküler tromboz olmadı. Bir adet reoperasyon gerektiren major kanama gözlendi (%7.1). Üç hastada minor yara komplikasyonları gözlendi (%21.4). Hiçbir hastada insizyonel herni gözlenmedi. Ortalama hastanede kalış süresi 5.85 gün (4-18gün), ortalama takip süresi 125gün (18-210 gün) idi. Ortalama serum kreatinin, taburculuk zamanında, postoperative en yüksek olduğu seviye ve şimdiki değerleri sırasıyla; 1.04 mg/dL (0.6-1.7 mg/dL); 1.26 mg/dL (0.8-1.9 mg/dL); 1.08 mg/dL (0.78-1.41 mg/dL) idi. Sonuç: Açık donör nefrektomi yaptığımız başlangıç serimizde major komplikasyon ile karşılaşmadık. Bu nedenle böbrek nakline yeni başlayan merkezler için başlangıçta açık donör nefrektominin güvenli bir yöntem olduğu kanaatindeyiz. Anahtar kelimeler: Nefrektomi; Böbrek Nakli; Canlı Verici.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Nefrektomi; Böbrek Nakli; Canlı Verici.

Open Donor Nephrectomy is a Safe Approach for Starting Kidney Transplantation

Aim: Living kidney donation is important due to the shortage of organ donors in Turkey. Classic retroperitoneal open donor nephrectomy is more beneficial as it can prevent intraperitoneal organ injuries and postoperative adhesion formation. Here we have presented our initial experience about donors who were undergone open donor nephrectomy. Material and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 14 donors who were undergone open nephrectomy between November 2010 and June 2011. We reviewed demographic data, intraoperative and postoperative complications, hospital stay, and serum creatinine levels (discharge time, postoperative maximum level and currently) for these donors. Results: Fourteen donors were operated during this period. The male to female ratio was 8:6 among donors. Mean age was 43.57 (range; 27-68) years. Mean body mass index was 27.71 (range; 21.3-36.1). Five right and nine left kidneys were harvested. There was no intraperitoneal organ injury. All kidney grafts started to function immediately. There was no vascular thrombosis in the transplanted kidneys. There was one major hemorrhagic complication requiring reoperation (7.1%). There were three minor wounds complications (21.4%). None of the donors had incisional hernia. Mean postoperative hospitalization time was 5.85 (range; 4-18) days. Mean flow up period was 125 days (range; 18-210 days). Mean serum creatinine level of discharge time, postoperative maximum level, and currently were; 1.04 mg/dL (range; 0.6-1.7); 1.26 mg/dL (range; 0.8-1.9); 1.08 mg/dL (range; 0.78-1.41) respectively. Conclusions; We did not have any major complication in our initial series for open donor nephrectomy. For those who are starting kidney transplantation, open donor nephrectomy is a safe method. Key words: Nephrectomy; Kidney Transplantation; Living Donor.

Keywords:

Nephrectomy; Kidney Transplantation; Living Donor.,

PDF

___

Dols LF, Kok NF, Ijzermans JNLive donor nephrectomy: a review of evidence for surgical techniques. Transpl Int 2010;23:121-30.
Chung BH, Jung MH, Bae SH, Kang SH, Hwang HS, Hyoung BJ et al. Changing donor source pattern for kidney transplantation over 40 years: a single-center experience. Korean J Intern Med 2010;25:288-93.
Hajji S, Cheddadi K, Medkouri G, Zamd M, Hachim K, Benghanem GM et al. Profile of living related kidney donors: a single center experience. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2010;21:967-70.
Aboutaleb E, Herbert P, Crane J, Hakim N. Mini-incision donor nephrectomy techniques: a systematic review. Exp Clin Transplant 2010;8:189-95.
Chalise PR, Shah DS, Sharma UK, Gvawali PR, Shrestha GK, Joshi BR et al. Renal transplantation in Nepal: the first year's experience. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2010;21:559-64.
Andersen MH, Bruserud F, Mathisen L, Wahl AK, Hanestad BR, Fosse E. Follow-up interviews of 12 living kidney donors one yr after open donor nephrectomy. Clin Transplant 2007;21:702-9.
Delmonico F. Council of the Transplantation Society. A Report of the Amsterdam Forum On the Care of the Live Kidney Donor: Data and Medical Guidelines. Transplantation 2005;79:53-66.
Ruszat R, Sulser T, Dickenmann M, Wolff T, Gurke L, Eurster T et al. Retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy: donor outcome and complication rate in comparison with three different techniques. World J Urol 2006;24:113-7.
Hartmann A, Fauchald P, Westlie L, Brekke IB, Holdaas H. The risk of living kidney donation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003;18:871-3.
Mitre AI, Dénes FT, Nahas WC, Simoes FA, Colombo JR, Piovesan AC et al. Comparative and prospective analysis of three different approaches for live-donor nephrectomy. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2009;64:23-8.
Kim BS, Yoo ES, Kwon TG. Complications of transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy: a single-center experience. Urology 2009;73(6):1283-7.
Brook NR, Gibbons N, Nicol DL, Mc Donald SP et al. Open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: activity and outcomes from all Australasian transplant centers. Transplantation 2010;89:1482-8.