Turkey. In most of the published studies, only a small part of the samples is extrapulmonary samples. So, our study provides valuable results in terms of evaluating a large number of extrapulmonary samples.

Giriş: Bu çalışmanın amacı BACTEC MGIT 960TB kültür sistemin sonuçları referans alınarak Xpert MTB/RIF testi’nin pulmoner ve ekstrapulmoner klinik örneklerde M. tuberculosis tanımlanmasındaki performansının değerlendirilmesidir. Materyal ve Metod: Çalışmaya TB şüphesiyle veya TB infeksiyonunu destekleyen bulgularla Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Uygulama ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tüberküloz Laboratuvarı’na gönderilen toplam 11.341 örnekten, aynı anda kültür (BACTEC MGIT 960TB), Xpert MTB/RIF (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, ABD) ve AFB testi istemi yapılan 6847 klinik örnek dahil edilmiştir. Çalışmaya alınan örneklerin 5096 tanesi pulmoner, 1751 tanesi ise ekstrapulmoner örneklerden oluşmuştur. Bulgular: Xpert MTB/RIF testinin duyarlılığı %96,1; özgüllüğü %99,7; pozitif prediktif değeri (PPD) %88,2; negatif prediktif değeri (NPD) ise %99,9 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Pulmoner örnekleri için bu değerler sırasıyla %98,3; %99,7; %89,9 ve %99,9 olarak belirlenmiştir. Ekstrapulmoner için ise testin duyarlılığı %89,4; özgüllüğü %99,5; PPD %82,9 ve NPD %99,7 olarak bulunmuştur. AFB pozitif örnekler için duyarlılık ve PPD değeri sırasıyla %99,0 ve %97,1 olarak bulunmuştur. AFB negatif örnekler için ise duyarlılık, özgüllük, PPD ve NPD değerleri sırasıyla; %90,5; %99,7; %73,8 ve %99,9 olarak belirlenmiştir. Sonuç: Çalışmamızda Xpert MTB/RIF testi ile çok sayıda klinik örneğin çalışılmış olması, testin ülkemiz koşullarında performansının belirlenmesinde yol gösterici olabilir. Özellikle ekstrapulmoner TB tanısında, Xpert MTB/RIF testinin etkinliği, Türkiye gibi orta derecede TB prevalansına sahip ülkelerde kesin olarak gösterilememiştir. Çalışmamız, çok sayıda ekstrapulmoner örneğin değerlendirilmesi açısından değerli sonuçlar vermektedir.

Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of the Xpert® MTB/RIF assay in pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay in the identification of M. tuberculosis in pulmonary and extrapulmonary clinical samples by taking the results of the BACTEC MGIT 960TB culture system as a reference. Materials and Methods: A total of 11,341 specimens sent to Sivas Cumhuriyet University Application and Research Hospital Tuberculosis Laboratory for microbiological examination with suspicion of tuberculosis infection between January 2013 and December 2019 were examined, and 6847 clinical specimens that underwent culture (BACTEC MGIT 960TB), Xpert MTB/RIF and AFB (Acid-fast bacilli) testing were selected and included in our study. Of the samples included in the study, 5096 samples were pulmonary, and 1751 were extrapulmonary samples. Results: In our study, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV values of Xpert MTB/ RIF and AFB were calculated by taking TB culture test as reference test. The sensitivity of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay was calculated as 96.1%, specificity as 99.7%, positive predictive value (PPV) as 88.2%, and negative predictive value (NPV) as 99.9%. These values for pulmonary samples were determined as 98.3%, 99.7%, 89.9%, and 99.9%, respectively. For extrapulmonary samples, the sensitivity of the assay was found as 89.4%, specificity as 99.5%, PPV as 82.9%, and NPV as 99.7%. The sensitivity and PPV values for AFBpositive samples were found to be 99.0% and 97.1%, respectively. For AFB negative samples, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV values were determined as 90.5%, 99.7%, 73.8%, and 99.9%, respectively. Conclusion: A large number of clinical samples were studied with the Xpert MTB/RIF test in our study. It can be a guide in determining the performance of the test under the conditions of our country. Especially in the diagnosis of extrapulmonary TB, the effectiveness of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay has not been certainly proven in countries having a moderate prevalence of TB, such as Turkey. In most of the published studies, only a small part of the samples is extrapulmonary samples. So, our study provides valuable results in terms of evaluating a large number of extrapulmonary samples.

___

  • 1. Azadi D, Motallebirad T, Ghaffari K. Mycobacteriosis and tuberculosis: laboratory diagnosis. Open Microbiology Journal 2018; 30 (12): 41-58.
  • 2. Moore DA, Evans CA, Gilman RH. Microscopicobservation drug-susceptibility assay for the diagnosis of TB. The New England J Med 2006; 355(15): 1539-50.
  • 3. Allahyartorkaman M, Mirsaeidi M, Hamzehloo G. Low diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF assay for extrapulmonary tuberculosis: A multicenter surveillance. Scientific Reports 2019; 9(1): 18515.
  • 4. World Health Organization (WHO). Early detection of tuberculosis: an overview of approaches, guidelines and tools. 2011.
  • 5. Gupta S, Kakkar V. Recent technological advancements in tuberculosis diagnostics - A review. Biosens Bioelect 2018; 115: 14-29.
  • 6. Blakemore R, Story E, Helb D, Kop J, Banada P, Owens MR, et al. Evaluation of the analytical performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. J Clin Microbiol 2010; 48 (7): 2495-501.
  • 7. Boehme CC, Nicol MP, Nabeta P, Michael JS, Gotuzzo E, Tahirli R, et al. Feasibility, diagnostic accuracy, and effectiveness of decentralised use of the Xpert MTB/RIF test for diagnosis of tuberculosis and multidrug resistance: a multicentre implementation study. Lancet 2011; 377(9776): 1495-505.
  • 8. World Health Organization (WHO). Xpert MTB/RIF implementation manual: Technical and operational howto practical considerations. WHO/HTM/TB/2014.1. Geneva; 2014.
  • 9. Genç GE, Yılmazlı Ö, Şatana D. Evaluation of Xpert MTB/ RIF assay for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and rifampicin resistance. Ankem Dergisi 2017; 31(2): 67-74.
  • 10. Çelik C, Gözel MG, Bakıcı MZ, Berk S, Özşahin SL, Gültürk E. Applicability of Xpert MTB/RIF assay for routine diagnosis of tuberculosis: a four-year single-center experience. Turkish J Med Sci 2015; 45(6): 1329-34.
  • 11. Chikaonda T, Nguluwe N, Barnett B. Performance of Xpert® MTB/RIF among tuberculosis outpatients in Lilongwe, Malawi. African J Lab Med 2017; 6(2): 464.
  • 12. Bajrami R, Mulliqi G, Kurti A, Lila G, Raka L. Comparison of GeneXpert MTB/RIF and conventional methods for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in Kosovo. J Infect Developing Countries 2016; 10 (4): 418-22.
  • 13. Rice JP, Seifert M, Moser KS, Rodwell TC. Performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampin resistance in a low-incidence, high-resource setting. PLoS One 2017; 12(10): e0186139.
  • 14. Metcalf T, Soria J, Montano SM, Ticona E, Evans CA, Huaroto L, et al. Evaluation of the GeneXpert MTB/RIF in patients with presumptive tuberculous meningitis. PLoS One 2018; 13(6): e0198695.
  • 15. Özkütük N, Sürücüoğlu S. Evaluation of the Xpert MTB/ RIF assay for the diagnosis of pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis in an intermediate-prevalence setting. Bullet Microbiol 2014; 48(2): 223-32.
  • 16. Suzana S, Ninan MM, Gowri M, Venkatesh K, Rupali P, Michael JS. Xpert MTB/Rif for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis-an experience from a tertiary care centre in South India. Tropic Med Int Health 2016; 21(3): 385- 92.
  • 17. Zeka AN, Tasbakan S, Cavusoglu C. Evaluation of the GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis and detection of rifampin resistance in pulmonary and extrapulmonary specimens. J Clin Microbiol 2011; 49(12): 4138-41.
  • 18. Chang K, Lu W, Wang J, Zhang K. Rapid and effective diagnosis of tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance with Xpert MTB/RIF assay: a meta-analysis. J Infect 2012; 64(6): 580-8.
  • 19. Theron G, Peter J, Calligaro. Determinants of PCR performance (Xpert MTB/RIF), including bacterial load and inhibition, for TB diagnosis using specimens from different body compartments. Scientific reports 2014; 4: 5658.
  • 20. American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diagnostic standards and classification of tuberculosis in adults and children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 161(4Pt1): 1376-95.
  • 21. World Health Organization (WHO). Implementing tuberculosis diagnostics: A policy framework. WHO/HTM/ TB/2015.11. Geneva; 2015.
  • 22. Steingart KR, Ng V, Henry M. Sputum processing methods to improve the sensitivity of smear microscopy for tuberculosis: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis 2006; 6(10): 664-74.
  • 23. Helb D, Jones M, Story E. Rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and rifampin resistance by use of on-demand, near-patient technology. J Clin Microbiol 2010; 48(1): 229- 37.
  • 24. Cepheid. Xpert® MTB/RIF assay package insert. Sunnyvale, CA; May, 2018.
Tüberküloz ve Toraks-Cover
  • ISSN: 0494-1373
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1951
  • Yayıncı: Tuba Yıldırım
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Flexible bronkoskopi ve endobronşiyal ultrasonda oksijen desatürasyonu ile ilişkili faktörler

Fatih TEKİN, Lütfi ÇÖPLÜ, İlim IRMAK, Ziya Toros SELÇUK

Sistemik romatizmal hastalıklarda akciğer tutulumunun, yüksek çözünürlüklü bilgisayarlı tomografi ve solunum fonksiyon testi ile değerlendirilmesi: Tek merkez deneyimi

Timur EKİZ, Ahmet Cemal PAZARLI, Handan İNÖNÜ KÖSEOĞLU, Halil İbrahim YAKAR, Ruken YÜKSEKKAYA ÇELİKYAY

Succesful treatment of COVID-19 infection in a child with tracheostomy

Tanıl KENDİRLİ, Emrah GÜN, Edin BOTAN, Halil ÖZDEMİR

Hastaneye yatan COVID-19 hastalarında mortalite belirteçlerinin değerlendirilmesi: Retrospektif kohort çalışması

Alp ŞENER, Melahat UZEL ŞENER, Ayperi ÖZTÜRK, Murat YILDIZ, Suna KAVURGACI, Figen ÖZTÜRK ERGÜR

Sağlık çalışanlarında COVID-19 fobisi; bir pandemi hastanesinden kesitsel bir çalışma

Burcu OKTAY ARSLAN, Emre ŞENEL, Özgür BATUM, Yelda VAROL, Zeynep Zeren UÇAR

Turkey. In most of the published studies, only a small part of the samples is extrapulmonary samples. So, our study provides valuable results in terms of evaluating a large number of extrapulmonary samples.

TAŞKIN KAFA, Mürşit HASBEK, Cem ÇELİK

GINA 2019 - astımda basamak 1 ve 2 tedavisi: Değişiklikler ve nedenleri

Sevim BAVBEK, Ali CENGİZ

Astım benzeri semptom mu veya “kistik fibrozis astım” mı?

Gökçen KARTAL ÖZTÜRK, Figen GÜLEN, Esen DEMİR, Aykut EŞKİ

Asthma phenotype and endotype definitions

İnsu YILMAZ, Gülden PAÇACI ÇETİN

COVID-19 pnömonisinde kortikosteroid kullanımı

Özlem ERÇEN DİKEN, Şevket ÖZKAYA, Pelin Pınar DENİZ, Fatma YILDIRIM, Meltem ŞİMŞEK, Cihan YÜCEL, Sinem BERİK SAFCI, Müge COŞKUN ÇELİK, Adem DİRİCAN, Devrim AKDAĞ, Pınar YILDIZ GÜLHAN