Inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty for large central perforations

Inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty for large central perforations

The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of inlay butterfly tympanoplasty technique in large central tympanic membrane perforations. Methods. The files of the patients who underwent inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty for large central tympanic membrane perforations were reviewed. Patients were followed with otoscopy and audiometry. Preoperative and postoperative pure-tone audiometry results were calculated and analyzed to evaluate the hearing gain. The grafting procedure was considered successful if no perforations were observed during postoperative microscopic or endoscopic evaluation during the follow-up period. Results. Twenty-nine patients with large central tympanic membrane perforation who were operated by inlay butterfly tympanoplastytechnique were included in the study. Twenty-one (72.4%) ears were operated with endoscope and 8 (27.6%) under microscope. The mean duration of surgery was 30.5±3.77 minutes. The mean follow-up time was 69.6±21.6 (range; 24-112 weeks). Graft take rate was 89.7% (26/29). Conclusion. Inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty is a minimal invasive and effective technique for repairing large central tympanic membrane perforations.

___

  • [1] Wullstein H. Theory and practice of tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope 1956;66:1076-93.
  • [2] Dornhoffer JL. Hearing results with cartilage tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope 1997;107:1094-9.
  • [3] Eavey RD. Inlay tympanoplasty: cartilage butterfly technique. Laryngoscope 1998;108:657-61.
  • [4] Alain H, Esmat NH, Ohad H, Yona V, Nageris BI. Butterfly myringoplasty for total, subtotal and annular perforations. Laryngoscope 2016;126:2565-8.
  • [5] Sheehy JL, Anderson RG. Myringoplasty: a review of 472 cases. Ann Otol 1980;89:331-4.
  • [6] Haksever M, Akduman D, Solmaz F, Gundogdu E. Inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty in the treatment of dry central perforated chronic otitis media as an effective and time-saving procedure. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015;272:867-72.
  • [7] Paltura C, Celebi S, Develioglu N, Chatzi T, Topak M, Ozkul MH, et al. [Transcanal tympanoplasty with cartilage-perichondrium composite graft]. JAREM 2015;5:107-9. [Article in Turkish]
  • [8] Eren SB, Tugrul S, Ozucer B, Veyseller B, Aksoy F, Ozturan O. Endoscopic transcanal inlay myringoplasty alternative approach for anterior perforations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015;153:891-3.
  • [9] Wang WH, Lin YC. Minimally invasive inlay and underlay tympanoplasty. Am J Otolaryngol 2008;29:363-6.
  • [10] Effat KG. Results of inlay cartilage myringoplasty in terms of closure of central tympanic membrane perforations. J Laryngol Otol 2005;119:611-3.
  • [11] Couloigner V, Baculard F, El Bakkouri W, Viala P, Francois M, Narcy P, et al. Inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty in children. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:247-51.
  • [12] Kim HJ, Kim MJ, Jeon JH, Kim JM, Moon IS, Lee WS. Functional and practical outcomes of inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty. Otol Neurotol 2014;35:1458-62.
  • [13] Lubianca-Neto JF. Inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty (Eavey technique) modified for adults. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;123:492-4.
  • [14] Mauri M, Lubianca Neto JF, Fuchs SC. Evaluation of inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Laryngoscope 2001;111:1479-85.
  • [15] Angeli SI, Kulak JL, Guzman J. Lateral tympanoplasty for total or neartotal perforation: prognostic factors. Laryngoscope 2006;116:1594- 9.
  • [16] Fishman AJ, Marrinan MS, Huang TC, Kanowitz SJ. Total tympanic membrane reconstruction: AlloDerm versus temporalis fascia. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;132:906-15.