A virtual pathway reduced the need for physical review in patients with a suspected scaphoid fracture

Objectives: Suspected scaphoid fractures are a common reason for referral from the emergency department tofracture clinics. Few patients actually have a fracture. Cross sectional imaging has the potential to improveearly diagnosis and reduce unneccessary immobilisation. The aim of this audit was to investigate theeffectiveness of a virtual pathway, incorporating early magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, for suspectedscaphoid fractures. The secondary aim was to investigate whether the accuracy of other clinical signs, such asanatomical snuffbox pain on wrist ulnar deviation, was sufficient to reduce the number of patients requiring aMRI scan.Methods: A prospective audit was undertaken of 123 patients in an emergency department and associatedminor injuries unit. These patients were managed with an early MRI scan. Where no significant injury wasfound, they were discharged after a phone call from a virtual fracture clinic nurse.Results: There were 16 (13%) true scaphoid fractures. MRI scanning showed other injuries including significantsoft tissue injuries (13%), other carpal fractures (17%) and fractures of the distal radius (19.5%). The numberof clinical appointments required was 0.42 per patient. Eighty patients did not have any face-to-face review.Other clinical examination techniques, such as anatomical snuff box pain on ulnar deviation of the wrist werenot sufficiently sensitive or specific to reduce the need for MRI scanning or review.Conclusions: A virtual fracture clinic pathway and early MRI scanning reduced face-to-face reviews andunneccesary immobilisation. Clinical examination techniques are not sufficiently sensitive to reduce the needfor scanning.

PDF

___

[1] Duckworth AD, Jenkins PJ, Aitken SA, Clement ND, CourtBrown CM, McQueen MM. Scaphoid fracture epidemiology. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012;72:E41-5.
[2] Unay K, Gokcen B, Ozkan K, Poyanli O, Eceviz E. Examination tests predictive of bone injury in patients with clinically suspected occult scaphoid fracture. Injury 2009;40:1265-8.
[3] Harrison W, Newton AW, Cheung G. The litigation cost of negligent scaphoid fracture management. Eur J Emerg Med 2015;22:142-3.
[4] Ring J, Talbot C, Price J, Dunkow P. Wrist and scaphoid fractures: a 17-year review of NHSLA litigation data. Injury 2015;46:682-6.
[5] Duckworth AD, Buijze GA, Moran M, Gray A, Court-Brown CM, Ring D, et al. Predictors of fracture following suspected injury to the scaphoid. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012;94:961-8.
[6] Bergh TH, Lindau T, Soldal LA, Bernardshaw SV, Behzadi M, Steen K, et al. Clinical scaphoid score (CSS) to identify scaphoid fracture with MRI in patients with normal x-ray after a wrist trauma. Emerg Med J 2014;31:659-64.
[7] Rhemrev SJ, Beeres FJP, van Leerdam RH, Hogervorst M, Ring D. Clinical prediction rule for suspected scaphoid fractures: a prospective cohort study. Injury 2010;41:1026-30.
[8] Yin Z-G, Zhang J-B, Gong K-T. Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for suspected scaphoid fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2015;29:e245-52.
[9] Karl JW, Swart E, Strauch RJ. Diagnosis of occult scaphoid fractures: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015;97:1860-8.
[10] Duckworth AD, Ring D, McQueen MM. Assessment of the suspected fracture of the scaphoid. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011;93:713-9.
[11] Kelson T, Davidson R, Baker T. Early MRI versus conventional management in the detection of occult scaphoid fractures: what does it really cost? A rural pilot study. J Med Radiat Sci 2016;63:9-16.