Bora ÇOŞKUN, Serdar ÖZATEŞ, Buğra ÇOŞKUN, Mehmet KINCI, Coşkun ŞİMŞİR

Retrospective evaluation of indications and birth results of cesarean section due to ophthalmologic diseases

Objectives: To investigate the outcomes of cesarean section due to ophthalmologic indications.

Keywords:

cesarean section, myopia, retinal detachment,

PDF

___

1. Declercq E, Young R, Cabral H, Ecker J. Is a rising cesarean delivery rate inevitable? Trends in industrialized countries, 1987 to 2007. Birth 2011;38:99-104.
2. Erol H, Özdemir A. [Health reforms and the evaluation of health expenditures in Turkey]. Sosyal Güvenlik Dergisi 2014,4:9-34. [Article in Turkish]
3. Ulubay M, Öztürk M, Fidan U, Keskin U, Fıratlıgil FB, Kıncı MF, et al. Skin incision lengths in caesarean section. Cukurova Med J 2016,41:82-6.
4. Festin MR, Laopaiboon M, Pattanittum P, Ewens MR, Henderson-Smart DJ, Crowther CA; SEA-ORCHID Study Group. Caesarean section in four South East Asian countries: reasons for, rates, associated care practices and health outcomes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2009,9:17.
5. Puzio M, Szczurowicz A, Rogoza A, Zwaliński M. [Non-obstetric indications for cesarean section from five years of material]. Ginekol Pol 1996,67:383-6. [Article in Polish]
6. Taner P, Akarsu C. [Ophthalmic changes in pregnancy]. J Ret-Vit 2001,9:169-78. [Article in Turkish]
7. Socha MW, Piotrowiak I, Jagielska I, Kazdepka-Ziemińska A, Szymański M, Duczmal M, et al. [Retrospective analysis of ocular disorders and frequency of cesarean sections for ocular indications in 2000-2008 -- our own experience]. Ginekol Pol 2010;81:188-91. [Article in Polish]
8. Chiu H, Steele D, McAlister C, Lam WC. Delivery recommendations for pregnant females with risk factors for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Can J Ophthalmol 2015;50:11-8.
9. Loncarek K, Petrovic O, Brajac I. Myopia and operative delivery in Croatia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004;85:287-8.
10. Inglesby DV, Little BC, Chignell AH. Surgery for detachment of the retina should not affect a normal delivery. BMJ 1990;300:980.
11. Psenkova P, Bucko M, Braticak M, Baneszova R, Zahumensky J. Impact of introducing specific measures to reduce the frequency of cesarean delivery for non‐obstetric indications. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2018;142:23-7.
12. Mackensen F, Paulus WE, Max R, Ness T. Ocular changes during pregnancy. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2014;111:567-76.
13. Landau D, Seelenfreund MH, Tadmor O, Silverstone BZ, Diamant Y. The effect of normal childbirth on eyes with abnormalities predisposing to rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1995;233:598-600.
14. Jünemann AG, Sterk N, Rejdak R. [Influence of mode of delivery on pre-existing eye diseases]. Ophthalmologe 2012;109:229-34. [Article in German]
15. Mohammadi SF, Letafat-Nejad M, Ashrafi E, Delshad-Aghdam H. A survey of ophthalmologists and gynecologists regarding termination of pregnancy and choice of delivery mode in the presence of eye diseases. J Curr Ophthalmol 2017;29:126-32.