Seedling Response of Iranian Barley Landraces to Pyrenophora teres f. teres and Pyrenophora teres f. maculata

Seedling Response of Iranian Barley Landraces to Pyrenophora teres f. teres and Pyrenophora teres f. maculata

Net blotch caused by Pyrenophora teres is an important pathogen of barley plants worldwide. There are two biotypesof the fungus. Pyrenophora teres f. teres (Ptt) causes the net form of the disease and Pyrenophora teres f. maculata(Ptm) causes the spot form of the disease. Barley landraces are good sources of disease resistance. In this study, seedlingresponse of 25 barley landraces obtained from diffrent regions of northwest Iran to 3 single spore isolates of Pttand 3 single spore isolates of Ptm were determined under greenhouse conditions. Diffrences in virulence among theisolates were evident. Some landraces showed diffrent responses to diffrent isolates. Landraces # 9 and # 16 showedmoderately resistant reactions to one isolate of Ptt and showed moderately resistant-moderately susceptible reactionsto 2 isolates of Ptt. Landraces # 7, # 11, # 15, # 17, # 21, # 22, # 23 and # 25 showed moderately resistant-moderatelysusceptible reactions to all 3 isolates of Ptt. Landrace # 23 showed resistant-moderately resistant reaction to one isolateof Ptm and showed moderately resistant reactions to 2 isolates of Ptm. Landrace # 16 showed moderately resistantreactions to all isolates of Ptm. Landraces # 11, # 15, # 21 and # 25 showed moderately resistant reaction to one isolateof Ptm and showed moderately resistant-moderately susceptible reactions to 2 isolates of Ptm. Landraces that exhibitedreactions between resistant and moderately resistant-moderately susceptible range could be used as a direct seedingmaterial to the fild or could be used as breeding materials.

___

  • Afanasenko O S, Makarova I G & Zubkovich A A (2000). Inheritance of resistance to diffrent Pyrenophora teres Dreschs. strains in barley accession CI 5791. In: Logue S. (Ed.). Proceedings of 8th International Barley Genetics Symposium, 22-27 October, Adelaide, Australia, 2: 73-75
  • Aktaş H (1995). Reaction of Turkish and German barley varieties and lines to the virulent strain T4 of Pyrenophora teres. Rachis 14: 9-13
  • Allard R W & Bradshaw A D (1964). Implications of genotype-environment interaction in applied plant breeding. Crop Science 4: 503-508
  • Badr A, Müller K, Schäfer-Pregl R, El Rabey H, Effen S, Ibrahim H H, Pozzi C, Rohde W & Salamini F (2000). On the origin and domestication history of barley (Hordeum vulgare). Molecular Biology and Evolution 17(4): 499-510
  • Burdon J J & Silk J (1997). Sources and patterns of diversity in plant-pathogenic fungi. Phytopathology 87: 664-669
  • Ceccarelli S & Grando S (2000). Barley landraces from the Fertile Crescent. A lesson for plant breeders. In: S B Brush (Ed.), Genes in the fild, On-farm conservation of crop diversity. Int. Plant Gen. Res. Institute, International Developmet Research Center, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton London New York Washington, D.C. pp. 51-76
  • Chakrabarti N K (1968). Some effcts of ultraviolet radiation on resistance of barley to net blotch and spot blotch. Phytopathology 58(4): 467-471
  • Çelik Oğuz A, Rahimi A & Karakaya A (2017a). Seedling response of Iranian barley landraces to Pyrenophora teres f. teres and Pyrenophora teres f. maculata. ICAFOF-International Conference on Agriculture, Forest, Food Sciences and Technologies. 15-17 May, Cappadocia, Turkey, pp. 394
  • Çelik Oğuz A, Karakaya A, Ergün N & Sayim İ (2017b). Turkish barley landraces resistant to net and spot forms of Pyrenophora teres. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 56(2): 217-223
  • Douiyssi A, Rasmusson D C & Roelfs A P (1998). Responses of barley cultivars and lines to isolates of Pyrenophora teres. Plant Disease 82: 316-321
  • Ebrahimi A, Naghavi M R, Sabokdast M, Sarabshelli A M & Ghaderdan K (2013). Evaluation of genetic diversity of Iranian wild barley (Hordeum sp.) and landraces using morphological characters. Iranian Journal of Rangelands and Forests Plant Breeding and Genetic Research 21(1): 56-67
  • Ellis R P, Forster B P, Robinson D, Handley L L, Gordon D C, Russell J R & Powell W (2000). Wild barley: a source of genes for crop improvement in the 21 st century? Journal of Experimental Botany 51(342): 9-17
  • Endresen D T F, Street K, Mackay M, Bari A & Pauw D E (2011). Predictive association between biotic stress traits and eco-geographic data for wheat and barley landraces. Crop Science 51: 2036-2055
  • Ergün N, Aydoğan S, Sayim İ, Karakaya A & Çelik Oğuz A (2017). Arpa (Hordeum vulgare L.) köy çeşitlerinde tane verimi ve bazı tarımsal özelliklerin incelenmesi. Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi 26(2): 180-189
  • FAO (2015). http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/ (Access date: 15.12.2016)
  • Frankel O H & Hawkes J G (1975). Crop Genetic Resources for Today and Tomorrow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  • Geçit H H (2016). Serin İklim Tahılları (Buğday, Arpa, Yulaf, Triticale). Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, Yayın No: 1640, Ankara
  • Ghazvini H & Tekauz A (2007). Reactions of Iranian barley accessions to three predominant pathogens in Manitoba. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 29: 69-78
  • Harlan J R & Zohary D (1966). Distribution of wild wheats and barley. Science 153: 1074-1080
  • Jana S & Bailey K L (1995). Responses of wild and cultivated barley from West Asia to net blotch and spot blotch. Crop Science 35: 242-246
  • Karakaya A & Akyol A (2006). Determination of the seedling reactions of some Turkish barley cultivars to the net blotch. Plant Pathology Journal 5(1): 113-114
  • Khan T N & Boyd W J R (1969). Physiologic specialization in Drechslera teres. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 22: 1229-1235
  • Khazaei A, Moghaddam M & Noormohammadi S (2012). Genetic diversity among winter barley landraces collected from west of Iran. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences 13(4): 671-683. (In Persian)
  • Khodayari H, Saeidi H, Roofiar A A, Rahiminejad M R, Pourkheirandish M & Komatsuda T (2012). Genetic diversity of cultivated barley landraces in Iran measured using microsatellites. International Journal of Bioscience, Biochemistry and Bioinformatics 2(4): 287-290
  • Lakew B, Semeane Y & Alemayehu F (1995). Evaluation of Ethiopian barley landraces for disease and agronomic characters. Rachis 14: 21-25
  • Legge W G, Metcalfe D R, Chiko A W, Martens J W & Tekauz A (1996). Reaction of Turkish barley accessions to Canadian barley pathogens. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 76: 927-931
  • Liu Z, Ellwood S R, Oliver R P & Friesen T L (2011). Pyrenophora teres: profie of an increasingly damaging barley pathogen. Molecular Plant Pathology 12(1): 1-19
  • Mathre D E (1982). Compendium of Barley Diseases. APS Press. Minnesota,78 pp
  • McLean M S, Howlett B J & Hollaway G J (2009). Epidemiology and control of spot form of net blotch (Pyrenophora teres f. maculata) of barley: a review. Crop & Pasture Science 60: 303-315
  • McLean M S, Howlett B J, Turkington T K, Platz G L & Hollaway G J (2012). Spot form of net blotch resistance in a diverse set of barley lines in Australia and Canada. Plant Disease 96: 569-576
  • Morrell P L & Clegg M T (2007). Genetic evidence for a second domestication of barley (Hordeum vulgare) east of the Fertile Crescent. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) 104(9): 3289-3294
  • Neupane A, Tamang P, Brueggeman R S & Friesen T L (2015). Evaluation of a barley core collection for spot form of net blotch reaction reveals distinct genotypespecifi pathogen virulence and host susceptibility. Phytopathology 105: 509-517
  • Nevo E (1992). Origin, evolution, population genetics and resources for breeding of wild barley, Hordeum spontaneum, in the Fertile Crescent. In: P R Shewry (Ed.), Barley: genetics, biochemistry, molecular biology and biotechnology, C.A.B. International, pp. 19-43
  • Newton A C, Akar T, Baresel J P, Bebeli P J, Bettencourt E, Bladenopoulos K V, Czembor J H, Fasoula D A, Katsiotis A, Koutis K, Koutsika-Sotiriou M, Kovacs G, Larsson H, Pinheiro de Carvalho M A A, Rubiales D, Russell J, Dos Santos T M M & Vaz Patto M C (2010). Cereal landraces for sustainable agriculture. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 30(2): 237-269
  • Semeane Y (1995). Importance and control of barley leaf blights in Ethiopia. Rachis 14: 83-89
  • Shipton W A, Khan T N & Boyd W J R (1973). Net blotch of barley. Review of Plant Pathology 52: 269-290
  • Silvar C, Casas A M, Kopahnke D, Habekus A, Schweizer G, Gracia M P, Lasa J M, Ciudad F J, Molina-Cano J L, Igartua E & Ordon F (2010). Screening the Spanish Barley Core Collection for disease resistance. Plant Breeding 129: 45-52
  • Tekauz A (1985). A numerical scale to classify reactions of barley to Pyrenophora teres. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 7: 181-183
  • TUIK (2016). Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. Türkiye’de arpa üretimi https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/bitkiselapp/bitkisel. zul. (Access date: 29.12.2016)
  • Vavilov N I (1951). The origin, variation, immunity and breeding of cultivated plants, (translated from the Russian by K. S. Chester). Chronica Botanica 13(1- 6): 1-364
  • Von Bothmer R (1996). Distribution and habitat preferences in the genus Hordeum in Iran and Turkey Annalen Des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien 98B Supplement: pp. 107-116
  • Yitbarek S, Berhane L, Fikadu A, Van Leur J A G, Grando S & Ceccarelli S (1998). Variation in Ethiopian barley landrace populations for resistance to barley leaf scald and net blotch. Plant Breeding 117: 419-423
  • Zadoks J C, Chang T T & Konzak C F (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14: 415-421
  • Zohary D & Hopf M (1993). Domestication of plants in the Old World. The origin and spread of cultivated plants in West Asia, Europe and the Nile Valley. Clarendon Press, Oxford, England
Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Halit APAYDIN
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

In Vitro Indirect Somatic Embryogenesis and Secondary Metabolites Production in the Saffon: Emphasis on Ultrasound and Plant Growth Regulators

Behnam FIROOZI, Nasser ZARE, Omid SOFALIAN, Parisa SHEIKHZADE-MOSADEGH

Comparison of Physicochemical Attributes of Einkorn Wheat (Triticum monococcum) and Durum Wheat (Triticum durum) and Evaluation of Morphological Properties Using Scanning Electron Microscopy and Image Analysis

Müge HENDEK ERTOP, Rabia ATASOY

Fatemeh BAREKATİ, Eslam MAJİDİ HERVAN, Amir Hossein SHİRANİ RAD, Ghorban NOOR MOHAMADİ

Effct of Sowing Date and Humic Acid Foliar Application on Yield and Yield Components of Canola Cultivars

Amir Hossein SHIRANI RAD, Fatemeh BAREKATI, Eslam MAJIDI HERVAN, Ghorban NOOR MOHAMADI

Hasan SARISU, Ömer Faruk KARAMÜRSEL, Fatma Pınar ÖZTÜRK, İsmail DEMİRTAŞ, Hakkı KOÇAL, İbrahim GÜR, Özlem CENGİZ, İsmail ŞEVİK

Ali Asghari, Rahmatollah Karimizadeh, Rahim Chinipardaz, Omid Sofalian, Abdolali Ghaffari, Kamal Shahbazi, Tahmasb Hosseinpour, Hassan Ghojog, Mohammad Armion

Başak Özdemir, Ajlan YILMAZ, Hatice Nurhan BÜYÜKKARTAL, Yeşim OKAY

Effct of Infrared, Ultraviolet-C Radiations and Vacuum Drying on Certain Chemical and Microbial Characteristics of Stuffd Pasta (Manti)

Ibrahim SAVRAN, Aytac KOCABAS, Suleyman GOKMEN, Hasan YETIM, Mehmet Fatih AYDIN, Abdulvahit SAYASLAN

Jale KORUN, Mesut YILMAZ, Mehmet GÖKOĞLU, Yağmur ÇELİK

Identifiation of Hordeum spontaneum Genotypes Resistant to Net Blotch Disease

Arzu ÇELİK OĞUZ, Rukiye MURAT DURAN, Kürşad ÖZBEK, Aziz KARAKAYA