Özay BALTAER, Mustafa ÜNLÜ, Ömer ARSLAN, Veysel ARAS, Ahmet Erhan ÖZDEMİR, Halit YETİŞİR, Elif ÇANDIR, Durmus ÜSTÜN

Rootstocks Affected Postharvest Performance of Grafted ‘Crisby’ and ‘Crimson Tide’ Watermelon Cultivars

Watermelon fruit from ‘Crisby’ (CR) and ‘Crimson Tide’ (CT) grafted onto Ferro, RS841, Argentario and Macis rootstocks and non-grafted CR and CT were compared for their postharvest quality at 7 °C for 21 days. Changes in rind thickness, weight loss, fruit flesh firmness, taste, total soluble solids, juice pH, titratable acidity, chilling injury and fungal decay, flesh color values, hallow heart, ripening, citric and malic acid, glucose, fructose, sucrose, total sugar, β-carotene and lycopene were determined during storage at a weekly interval. Watermelon fruit cv. CT grafted on Ferro, RS841 and Argentario rootstocks had thicker rind, lower ripening score, higher flesh firmness and lycopene content, more intense red color during storage, compared to non-grafted fruit. In comparison to non-grafted fruit, CR fruit grafted on Ferro, RS841 and Argentario rootstocks had thicker rind and higher flesh firmness, but higher lycopene content and C* values with lower ripening scores were observed only in the fruit grafted on Ferro and RS841 rootstocks. Macis and Argentario may lead an over-ripening, softening and less intense flesh color with lower lycopene content for CR and/or CT fruit during storage. Watermelons could successfully be kept for 21 days at 7 °C. Watermelons grafted on Ferro and RS841 rootstocks retained better postharvest quality, compared to the non-grafted fruit for both cultivars.

PDF

___

Alan Ö, Özdemir N & Günen Y (2007). Effect of grafting on watermelon plant growth, yield and quality. Journal of Agronomy 6: 362-365
Aras V, Özdemir A E, Yetişir H, Çandır E, Güler Z, Aslan Ö, Üstün D, Baltaer Ö & Ünlü M (2015). Sergen koşullarda aşılı ‘Crimson Tide’ çeşidi karpuzlarda kalite parametrelerindeki değişimler. Alatarım 14(1): 9-18
Bekhradi F, Kashi A & Delshad M (2011). Effect of three cucurbits rootstocks on vegetative and yield of ‘Charleston Gray’ watermelon. International Journal of Plant Production 5: 105-110
Bruton B D, Fish W W, Roberts W & Popham T W (2009). The Influence of rootstock selection on fruit quality attributes of watermelon. The Open Food Science Journal 3: 15-34
Chisholm D N & Picha D H (1986). Effect of storage temperature on sugar and organic acid contents of watermelons. HortScience 21: 1031-1033
Cushman K E & Huan J (2008). Performance of four triploid watermelon cultivars grafted onto five rootstock genotypes: Yield and fruit quality under commercial growing conditions. Acta Horticulturae 782: 335-341
Çandır E, Yetişir H, Karaca F & Üstün D (2013). Phytochemical characteristics of grafted watermelon on different bottle gourds (Lagenaria siceraria) collected from the Mediterranean region of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 37: 443- 456
Davis A R & Perkins-Veazie P (2005). Rootstock effects on plant vigor and watermelon fruit quality. Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative Report 28: 39-42
Davis A R, Perkins-Veazie P, Hassell R, Levi A, King S R & Zhang X (2008). Grafting effects on vegetable quality. HortScience 43: 1670-1672
Karaca F, Yetişir H, Solmaz İ, Çandır E, Kurt Ş, Sarı N & Güler Z (2012). Rootstock potential of Turkish Lagenaria siceraria germplasm for watermelon: Plant growth yield and quality. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 36: 1-11
King S R, Davis A R, Zhang X & Crosby K (2010). Genetics, breeding and selection of rootstocks for Solanaceae and Cucurbitaceae. Scientia Horticulturae 127: 106-111
Kyriacou M C & Soteriou G (2015). Quality and postharvest performance of watermelon fruit in response to grafting on interspecific cucurbit rootstocks. Journal of Food Quality 38: 21-29
Miguel A, Maroto J V, San Bautista A, Baixauli C, Cebolla V, Pascual B, Lopez S & Guardiola J L (2004). The grafting of triploid watermelon is an advantageous alternative to soil fumigation by methyl bromide for control of fusarium wilt. Scientia Horticulturae 103: 9-17
Neto A, Hafle O M, Gurgel F L, Menezes J B & Silva G G (2000). Quality and postharvest shelf life of crimson sweet watermelon marketed in Mossoro. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 4: 235-239
Özdemir A E, Yetişir H, Çandır E, Aras V, Aslan Ö, Üstün D & Ünlü M (2014). Aşılı üretilen ‘Crimson Tide’ karpuz çeşidinin derim olum zamanının saptanması. Alatarım 13(2): 9-14
Özdemir A E, Çandır E, Yetişir H, Aras V, Arslan Ö, Baltaer Ö, Üstün D & Ünlü M (2016). Effects rootstocks on storage and shelf life of grafted watermelons. Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality 89: 191-201
Perkins-Veazie P & Collins J K (2006). Carotenoid changes of intact watermelons after storage. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 54: 5868-5874
Proietti S, Rouphael Y, Colla G, Cardarelli M, De Agazio M, Zacchini M, Rea E, Moscatello S & Battistelli A (2008). Fruit quality of mini-watermelon as affected by grafting and irrigation regimes. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 88: 1107-1114
Radulovic´ M, Ban D, Sladonja B & Lusetić-Bursić V (2007). Changes of quality parameters in watermelon during storage. Acta Horticulturae 731: 451-456
Risse L A, Brecht J K, Sargent S A, Locascio S J, Crall J M, Elmstrom G W & Maynard D N (1990). Storage characteristics of small watermelon cultivars. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 115: 440-443
Roberts W, Bruton B, Fish W & Taylor M (2007). Using grafted transplants in watermelon production. (Ed: W T Kelley), Proceedings of the 2007 Southeast Regional Vegetable Conference Savannah, 5-7 January 2007, Georgia, pp. 33-36
SAS (2017). SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 9.4 SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA
Soteriou G A & Kyriacou M C (2015). Rootstock mediated effects on watermelon field performance and fruit quality characteristics. International Journal of Vegetable Science 21: 344-362
Soteriou G A, Kyriacou M C, Siomos A S & Gerasopoulos D (2014). Evolution of watermelon fruit physicochemical and phytochemical composition during ripening as affected by grafting. Food chemistry 165: 282-289
Suárez-Hernández Á M, Grimaldo-Juárez O, GarcíaLópez A M, González-Mendoza D & HuitrónRamírez M V (2016). Influence of rootstock on postharvest watermelon quality. Revista Chapingo Serie Horticultura (doi: 10.5154/r.rchsh.2016.06.019) 23(1): 49-58
Suslow T V (1997). Watermelon: recommendations for maintaining postharvest quality. http://postharvest. ucdavis.edu/Produce/Producefacts/Fruit/watermelon. shtml (Accessed: 20.10.2017)
Yetişir H & Sarı N (2003). Effect of different rootstock on plant growth, yield and quality of watermelon. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43: 1269-1274
Yetişir H, Sarı N & Yücel S (2003). Rootstock resistance to Fusarium wilt and effect on watermelon fruit yield and quality. Phytoparasitica 31: 163-169