Genetic analysis of maize (zea mays l.) hybrids using microsatellite markers

Genetik safık, hibrit tohum üretimi için gerekli olan önemli kalite kriterlerinden biridir. Bu çalışmada, molekülerişaretleyiciler ticari olarak önemli 3 mısır F 1 hibrit çeşidi (Pasha, Frida ve PG1661) ve kendilenmiş saf ebeveyn hatlarınıngenetik safık ve çeşitlilik analizleri için kullanılmıştır. Örnekler, elli adet basit dizi tekrarları (SSR) işaretleyicilerikullanılarak analiz edilmiş ve işaretleyicilerin verimliliği karşılaştırılmıştır. Testlenen 50 işaretleyici içinden 23 primerçifti ortalama 0.69 polimorfzm bilgisi değeri ile değişik hibrit çeşitleri arasındaki farklılığı tespit etmiştir. Hibrittohumların genetik safık analizi, % 98den yüksek homoloji oranı ile sonuçlanmıştır. Hibritler, 3 ana gruba toplamıştır.Bu çalışma ile moleküler işaretleyicilerin mısır hibritlerinin genetik safık ve çeşitlilik analizleri için kullanılmasınınverimli olduğu ve mikrosatellitlerin ko-dominantlık özellikleri nedeni ile doğru işaretleyiciler olduğu saptanmıştır.

Mısır (zea mays l.) hibritlerinin mikrosatellit işaretleyiciler kullanılarak genetik analizleri

Genetic purity is one of the most important quality criteria required for successful hybrid seed production. In this study,molecular markers were used for assessing the genetic purity and diversity of three commercially important maize F 1hybrids (Pasha, Frida and PG1661) and their parental inbred lines. Fifty Simple Sequence Repeats (SSRs) markers wereused to analyze samples, also the effciency of the markers were compared. Twenty three primer pairs among the fftymarkers were able to detect polymorphism between the different types of hybrids with an average of 0.69 polymorphisminformation content (PIC) value. Genetic purity analyses revealed more than 98% homogeneity in the hybrid seeds. Thehybrids were grouped into three main clusters. It can be concluded that, molecular markers are effcient to study the geneticpurity and diversity in maize hybrids and microsatellites are more accurate marker-type because of their co-dominancy.

___

  • Ajmone-Marsan P, Castiglioni P, Fusari F, Kuiper M & Motto M (1998). Genetic diversity and its relationship to hybrid performance in maize as revealed by RFLP and AFLP markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 96 : 219-227
  • Anderson J A, Churchill G A & Autrique J E (1993). Optimizing parental selection for genetic linkage maps. Genome 36 : 181-186
  • Bornet B & Branchard M (2001). Nonanchored inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers: Reproducible and specifc tools for genome fngerprinting. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 19 : 209-215
  • Dangle G A, Mendum M L, Prins B H, Walker M A, Meredith C P & Simon C J (2001). Simple sequence repeat analysis of a clonally propagated species: a tool for managing a grape germplasm collection. Genomet 44 : 432-438
  • Daniel I O, Adetumbi J A, Oyelakin O O, Olakojo S A, Ajala M O & Onagbesan S O (2012). Application of SSR markers for genetic purity analysis of parental inbred lines and some commercial hybrid maize (Zea mays L.). American Journal of Experimental Agriculture 2 (4): 597-606
  • Doyle J J & Doyle J L (1990). Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12 : 13-15
  • Dubreuil P & Charcosset A (1998). Genetic diversity within and among maize populations: A comparison between isozyme and nuclear RFLP loci. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 96 : 577-587
  • FAO (2012). Statistical database. Available at: http:// www.fao.org
  • Gül İnce A, Karaca M & Onus A N (2011). Exact microsatellite density differences among capsicum tissues and development stages. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi-Journal of Agricultural Sciences 17 (4): 291- 299
  • Hipi A, Surahman M, Ilyas S & Giyanto (2013). Seed genetic purity assessment of maize hybrid using microsatellite markers (SSR). International Journal of Applied Science and Technology 3 (5): 66-71
  • Koranyi P (1989). Simple purity checking of maize lines and hybrids by protein monomer analysis. Seed Science and Technology 17 : 161-168
  • Lucchese C, Dinelli G, Miggiano A & Lovato (1999). Identifcation of pepper (Capsicum spp) cultivars by feld and electrophoresis tests. Seed Science and Technology 27 : 37-47
  • MaizeGDB (2013). Maize Genetics and Genomics Database. Available at: http:// http://www.maizegdb. Org
  • Mammadov J A, Chen W, Ren R, Pai R, Marchione W, Yalçın F, Witsenboer H, Greene T W, Thompson S A & Kumpatla S P (2010). Development of highly polymorphic SNP markers from the complexity reduced portion of maize [Zea mays L.] genome for use in marker-assisted breeding. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 121 (3): 577-88
  • Mingsheng W, Xihai J, Lei T & Baochun L (2006). Rapid and reliable purity identifcation of F1 hybrids of maize (Zea mays L.) using SSR markers. Molecular Plant Breeding 4 (3): 381-384
  • Pejic I, Ajmone-Marsan M, Morgante M, Kozumplick V, Castiglioni P, Taramino G & Motto M (1998). Comparative analysis of genetic similarity among maize inbred lines detected by RFLPs, RAPDs, SSRs and AFLPs. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 97 : 1248-1255
  • Powell W, Morgante M, Andre C, Hanagey M, Vogel J, Tingey S & Rafalski A (1996). The comparison of RFLP, RAPD AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis.
  • Molecular Breeding 2 : 225- 238 Rohlf F J (2000). NTSYS-PC. Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. Version 2.0 Exeter Software, Setaket, NewYork
  • Roos E E & Wianer L E (1991). Seed testing and quality assurance. HortTechnology 11 : 65-69
  • Salgado K C P C, Vieira M D G G C, Pinho E V R V, Guimaraes C T, Pinho R G V & Sousa R G V (2006). Genetic purity certifcate in seeds of hybrid maize using molecular markers. Revista Brasileira de Sementes 28 (1): 169-175
  • Shehata A I, Al-Ghethar H A & Al-Homaidan A A (2009). Application of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers for molecular diversity and heterozygosity analysis in maize inbred lines. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 16 : 57-62
  • Srdic J, Mladenovic Drinic S, Pajic Z & Filipovic M (2007). Characterization of maize inbred lines based on molecular markers, heterosis and pedigree data. Genetika 39 (3): 355-363
  • Wang C, Bian K, Zhang H, Zhou Z & Wang J (1994). Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of salt soluble proteins for maize variety identifcation and genetic purity assessment. Seed Science and Technology 22 : 51-57
  • Warburton M L, Zianchun X, Crossa J, Frnaco J, Melchinger A E, Frisch M, Bohn M & Hoisington D (2002). Genetic characterization of CIMMYT inbred maize lines and open pollinated populations using large scale fngerprinting methods. Crop Science 42 : 1832-1840
Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Halit APAYDIN
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Mekanik hasarsız çarpma tekniğiyle domatesin sertliğine göre sınıfandırılması

Hande KÜÇÜKÖNDER, Kubilay Kazım VURSAVUŞ, Zehan KESİLMİŞ

The effects of drying methods, packaging atmosphere and storagetime on dried pomegranate aril quality

Muharrem GÖLÜKCÜ

Nutritive Value of Sunflower Silages Ensiled with Corn or Alfalfa at Different Rate

Mustafa TAN

Isı Pompalı Kurutucuda Atık Isı Kullanımının Performansa Etkisi ve Deneysel Analizi

Mustafa AKTAŞ, Burak AKTEKELİ

Tuta absoluta (meyrick, 1917) (lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)'nın farklı domates çeşitleri üzerinde yaşam çizelgesi

Bülent YAŞAR, Demet ÇEKİN

Farklı Tuzluluk ve Sulama Rejimi Şartlarında Sivri Biber Gelişimi ve Bitki Tuzluluk Toleransında Su Tüketiminin Kullanılabilirliği

Ali ÜNLÜKARA, Ali ÜNLÜKARA, Ali ÜNLÜKARA, Ahmet KURUNÇ, Bilal CEMEK

Değişik Düzeylerde Mikro Besin Maddesi ile Gübrelemenin Sorgum Çeşitlerinde Tanenin Protein, Bazik ve Asidik Amino Asit İçeriğine Etkisi

Elfadil BABİKER

Isı pompalı kurutucuda atık ısı kullanımının performansa etkisi ve deneysel analizi

Burak AKTEKELİ, Mustafa AKTAŞ

Tütsülenmiş ve Marine Edilmiş Gökkuşağı Alabalığı (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Filetolarının Soğutulmuş Saklama Süresince Elektroforetik Protein Profilindeki Değişimler

Makbule BAYLAN, Makbule BAYLAN, Gamze MAZI, Numan ÖZCAN, Bahri ÖZCAN, Mustafa AKAR, Ali COŞKUN

Green long pepper growth under different saline and water regime conditions and usability of water consumption in plant salt tolerance

Ali ÜNLÜKARA, Ahmet KURUNÇ, Bilal CEMEK