Development of an Automatic System to Detect and Spray Herbicides in Corn Fields

Development of an Automatic System to Detect and Spray Herbicides in Corn Fields

Weed control is vital in agricultural production. Chemical controlmethods are generally preferred in weed control as they (1) affectquickly and (2) reduce the labour requirement. However, inconventional applications chemicals are generally applied towhole field surface. Therefore, non-targeted areas are alsosprayed. This increases 1) amount of herbicide used and (2)risk of off-target chemical movement. In this study, a patchspraying system was developed to automatically detect and sprayherbicides on weeds in the corn field based on weed density. Inorder to determine the weed regions, a digital camera was fittedin front of the tractor. The images taken using the camera werethen simultaneously processed using an algorithm written inMatlabTM software. The results of the field study showed that at4, 6 and 8 km h-1 forward speeds, application volumes decreaseby 30.21%, 28.82% and 32.28%, respectively, when it iscompared to the conventional application methods. It was alsodetermined that the application accuracy rates were 80%, 81.66%and 75% respectively for 4, 6 and 8 km h-1 speeds.

___

  • Agrawal K N, Singh K, Bora G C & Lin D (2012). Weed recognition using image-processing technique based on leaf parameters. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 2(8B): 899-908
  • Aydemir S & Karaoğlu S (2008). Zirai mücadele teknik talimatları cilt VI. T.C. Gıda Tarım ve Hayvancılık Bakanlığı, Tarımsal Araştırmalar ve Politikalar Genel Müdürlüğü, Bitki Sağlığı Araştırmaları Daire Başkanlığı. Retrieved in December, 07, 2018 from https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/TAGEM/Belgeler/Teknik%20tal%C4%B1matlar%202008/C%C4%B0LT %204. pdf
  • Burgos-Artizzu X P, Ribeiro A, Guijarro M & Pajares G (2011). Real-time image processing for crop/weed discrimination in maize fields. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 75(2): 337-346
  • Gonzalez-de-Soto M, Emmi L, Perez-Ruiz M, Aguera J & Gonzalez-de-Santos P (2016). Autonomous systems for precise spraying – evaluation of a robotised patch sprayer. Biosystems Engineering 146: 165-182
  • Hlaing S H & Khaing A S (2014). Weed and crop segmentation and classification using area thresholding. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology 3(3): 375-380
  • IDS (2017). USB 2 uEye ML industrial camera. Retrieved in January, 26, 2017 from https://en.ids-imaging.com/store/ products/cameras/usb-2-0-cameras/ueye-l.html
  • Jeon H Y, Tian L F & Zhu H (2011). Robust crop and weed segmentation under uncontrolled outdoor illumination. Sensors 11(1): 6270-6283
  • Liu H, Lee S H & Saunders C (2014). Development of a machine vision system for weed detection during both of off-season and in-season in broadacre no-tillage croppıng lands. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9(2): 174- 193
  • Matlab (2017). Image acquisition toolbox, The Mathworks Inc. Retrieved in March, 11, 2017 from https://www.mathworks.com/products/imaq.html
  • Ortiz M P, Pena J M, Gutierrez P A, Sanchez J T & Martinez C H (2015). A semi-supervised system for weed mapping in sunflower crops using unmanned aerial vehicles and a crop row detection method. Applied Soft Computing 37(2015): 533- 544
  • Otsu N (1979). A threshold selection method from graylevel histograms. IEEE Transactions Systems Man Cybernetics 9(1): 62-66
  • Pajares G (2015). Overview and current status of remote sensing applications based on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVS), Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 81(4): 281-330
  • Rajcan I, Chandler K J & Swanton C J (2004). Red-far-red ratio of reflected light: A hypothesis of why early-season weed control is important in corn. Weed Science 52(5): 774-778
  • Romeo J, Guerrero J M, Montalvo M, Emmi L, Guijarro M, Santos P G & Pajares G (2013). Camera sensor arrangement for crop/weed detection accuracy in agronomic images. Sensors 13(4): 4348-4366
  • Sabancı K (2013). Şeker pancarı tarımında yabancı ot mücadelesi için değisken düzeyli herbisit uygulama parametrelerinin yapay sinir ağlarıyla belirlenmesi. Doktora Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, (Published), Konya, Türkiye
  • Sabzi S & Gilandeh Y A (2018). Using video processing to classify potato plant and three types of weed using hybrid of artificial neural network and particle swarm algorithm. Measurement (126): 22-36
  • Sezgin M & Sankur B (2004). Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation. Journal of Electronic Imaging 13(1): 146-165
  • TAGEM (2017). Mısır tarımı. Retrieved in February, 27, 2017 from http://arastirma.tarim.gov.tr/ttae/Sayfalar/ Detay.aspx?SayfaId=89
  • Tang J L, Chen X Q, Miao R H & Wang D (2016). Weed detection using image processing under different illumination for site-specific areas spraying. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 122(2016): 103-111
  • Tekinalp Z, Oztürk S & Kuncan M (2013). OPC Kullanılarak gerçek zamanlı haberleşen Matlab ve PLC kontrollü sistem. In: Otomatik Kontrol Ulusal Toplantısı, 26-28 September, Malatya, pp. 465-470
  • Tursun N, Sakınmaz M S & Kantarcı Z (2015). Mısır varyetelerinde yabancı ot kontrolu için kritik periyotların belirlenmesi. Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Arastırma Enstitüsü Dergisi 25(1): 58-63
  • Üstüner T & Güncan A (2002). Niğde ve yöresi patates tarlalarında sorun olan yabancı otların yoğunluğu ve önemi ile topluluk oluşturmaları üzerine araştırmalar. Türkiye Herboloji Dergisi 5(2): 30-42
  • Vikhram G Y R, Agarwal R, Uprety R & Prasantah V N S (2018). Automatic weed detection and smart herbicide sprayer robot. International Journal of Engineering & Technology 7(3.6) 115-118
  • Vioix J B, Sliwa T & Gee C H (2006). An automatic inter and intra-row weed detection in agronomic images. In: XVI CIGR World Congress, 5-6 September, Bonn, Allemagne, pp. 281-286
  • Woebbecke D M, Meyer G E & Von Bargen Mortensen D A (1995). Shape features for identifying young weeds using image analysis. Transactions of the ASAE 38(1): 271-281